Prohibición de la doble militancia en modalidad de apoyo por parte de candidatos a cargos de elección territorial durante su campaña electoral 2020 al 2023 en Colombia: un análisis de sus causas
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2025
Autores
Gelvez Morales, Josser Esneider
Prada García, Karina
Rodríguez Ardila, Andrés Camilo
Sánchez Alsina, Yeinson Javier
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Administración y Negocios
Facultad de Administración y Negocios
Resumen
El presente trabajo de grado analizó la prohibición de la doble militancia en su modalidad de apoyo cometida por candidatos a cargos de elección popular en Colombia
durante las campañas políticas del periodo 2020-2023. Su objetivo fue identificar los fundamentos normativos y jurisprudenciales que sustentan dicha prohibición, los elementos
que la configuran y las causas que motivan su práctica. Se adoptó un paradigma interpretativo con enfoque cualitativo, empleando revisión documental de normativa, jurisprudencia y doctrina en el marco del derecho electoral.
La figura de la doble militancia se fundamenta en el artículo 107 de la Constitución de 1991, los Actos Legislativos 01 de 2003 y 2009, y la Ley Estatutaria 1475 de 2011, que prohíbe a los miembros de un partido político apoyar a candidatos ajenos a su colectividad, estableciendo sanciones como pérdida de credencial o inhabilidad. Para su configuración, el Consejo de Estado en su Sección Quinta establece cinco elementos: subjetivo, objetivo, temporal, modal y territorial, los cuales permiten constatar la conducta y sus consecuencias jurídicas.
El artículo 2 de la Ley 1475 considera esta prohibición causal de revocatoria de inscripción o nulidad electoral, al afectar la coherencia y transparencia de la contienda política. Entre las causas de su comisión destaca el desconocimiento de su alcance e implicaciones legales. El análisis concluye que existe un marco normativo y jurisprudencial sólido que regula la doble militancia en su modalidad de apoyo, delimitando sus elementos configurativos y las circunstancias que inciden en su aplicación en escenarios electorales.
This thesis analyzed the prohibition of double membership in its “support” modality committed by candidates for popularly elected positions in Colombia during the 2020–2023 political campaigns. The objective was to identify the normative and jurisprudential foundations that support this prohibition, the elements that configure it, and the causes that motivate its practice. An interpretative paradigm with a qualitative approach was adopted, using documentary review of regulations, case law, and doctrine within the framework of electoral law. The figure of double membership is based on Article 107 of the 1991 Constitution, Legislative Acts 01 of 2003 and 2009, and Statutory Law 1475 of 2011, which prohibits members of a political party from supporting candidates outside their own group, establishing sanctions such as loss of credentials or disqualification. For its configuration, the Council of State, Fifth Section, establishes five elements: subjective, objective, temporal, modal, and territorial, which allow verification of the conduct and its legal consequences. Article 2 of Law 1475 considers this prohibition a cause for revocation of registration or electoral annulment, as it affects the coherence and transparency of the political contest. Among the causes for its commission is the lack of knowledge about its scope and legal implications. The analysis concludes that there is a solid normative and jurisprudential framework regulating double membership in its “support” modality, defining its constitutive elements and the circumstances that influence its application in electoral contexts
This thesis analyzed the prohibition of double membership in its “support” modality committed by candidates for popularly elected positions in Colombia during the 2020–2023 political campaigns. The objective was to identify the normative and jurisprudential foundations that support this prohibition, the elements that configure it, and the causes that motivate its practice. An interpretative paradigm with a qualitative approach was adopted, using documentary review of regulations, case law, and doctrine within the framework of electoral law. The figure of double membership is based on Article 107 of the 1991 Constitution, Legislative Acts 01 of 2003 and 2009, and Statutory Law 1475 of 2011, which prohibits members of a political party from supporting candidates outside their own group, establishing sanctions such as loss of credentials or disqualification. For its configuration, the Council of State, Fifth Section, establishes five elements: subjective, objective, temporal, modal, and territorial, which allow verification of the conduct and its legal consequences. Article 2 of Law 1475 considers this prohibition a cause for revocation of registration or electoral annulment, as it affects the coherence and transparency of the political contest. Among the causes for its commission is the lack of knowledge about its scope and legal implications. The analysis concludes that there is a solid normative and jurisprudential framework regulating double membership in its “support” modality, defining its constitutive elements and the circumstances that influence its application in electoral contexts
Descripción
Palabras clave
Partidos políticos, Transfuguismo, Elecciones territoriales, Sistema democrático y régimen de bancadas
