Análisis dogmático de la responsabilidad del estado por los daños ocasionados a los reclusos en Colombia
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Reyes Acosta, Vita Paola
Rada Herrera, Giovanni
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El Estado como ente jurídico es posible que responda patrimonialmente por los
daños antijurídicos ocasionados en razón de las distintas actividades que desarrolla.
Todo depende de las exigencias dogmáticas para acreditar la responsabilidad del
Estado en su aspecto sustancial general que establece un régimen de
responsabilidad objetiva y otro régimen de responsabilidad subjetiva. Este último
régimen con número adicional de categorías dogmáticas adicionales al primero y
por ende más exigente trayendo consigo que se amplíen entonces los eventos de
ausencia de responsabilidad del Estado. Uno de los distintos tipos de
responsabilidad del Estado en la parte sustancial especial es el de los daños
ocasionados a los reclusos. Menester es precisar a qué régimen de responsabilidad
obedece este último. A lo que concluimos que el régimen de responsabilidad
subjetiva es el pertinente para ese debate. Y dado que al hablar de responsabilidad
subjetiva no se refiere a nexo psicológico entre el sujeto y el resultado sino en
realidad a la culpa como un elemento objetivo y normativo es menester traer a
colación los criterios ordenados de la teoría de la imputación objetiva del penalista
Alemán Gunther Jakobs para establecer entonces además de la relación de
causalidad entre la actividad del Estado y en daño antijurídico que la culpa haya
sido determinante en el resultado con los criterios de posición de garante, creación
del riesgo jurídicamente relevante y realización del riesgo en el resultado.
The State as legal entity is possible that respond patrimonially for unlawfull damages caused by reason of the different activities it develops. It all depends on the dogmatic demands to accredit the state liability in its general substancial aspect that establishes a objective liability regime and other subjetive liability regime. This last regime with additional number of dogmatics categories additional to the first and therefore more demanding bringing with it let the expand so absence events of state liability. One of the different kinds of state liability in the special sustancial part is the damages caused to prisioners. It’s necessary to specify to which liability regime obey the latter. To what conclude that the subjective liability regime is the relevant for that debate. And given that when we talking of subjective liability doesn’t refer to psychological link between the subject and autcome but rather actually to blame as an objective and normative element it is necessary to bring up the ordered criteria of the theory of objective imputation of the German criminal lawyer Gunther Jakobs for establish in addition to the causal relationship between the state activity and in unlawful damage that the fault has benn determinant in the autcome with the guarantor position criteria, of the legally relevant risk creation and risk realization in the autocome.
The State as legal entity is possible that respond patrimonially for unlawfull damages caused by reason of the different activities it develops. It all depends on the dogmatic demands to accredit the state liability in its general substancial aspect that establishes a objective liability regime and other subjetive liability regime. This last regime with additional number of dogmatics categories additional to the first and therefore more demanding bringing with it let the expand so absence events of state liability. One of the different kinds of state liability in the special sustancial part is the damages caused to prisioners. It’s necessary to specify to which liability regime obey the latter. To what conclude that the subjective liability regime is the relevant for that debate. And given that when we talking of subjective liability doesn’t refer to psychological link between the subject and autcome but rather actually to blame as an objective and normative element it is necessary to bring up the ordered criteria of the theory of objective imputation of the German criminal lawyer Gunther Jakobs for establish in addition to the causal relationship between the state activity and in unlawful damage that the fault has benn determinant in the autcome with the guarantor position criteria, of the legally relevant risk creation and risk realization in the autocome.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Responsabilidad, Causalidad, Imputación, Daño, Responsability, Causality, Imputation, Damage
