Análisis de la sentencia no. 73001-23-31-000-2000-03075-01(24897) del consejo de estado - sala contenciosa administrativa - sección tercera, de 19 de noviembre de 2012
Cargando...
Fecha
2024
Autores
Solano Beltrán, Gustavo Enrique
Venegas Mercado, Marco Antonio
Alarcón Cervantes, Raúl
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente estudio de caso trae a colación el análisis de la inconsistencia en posturas en lo concerniente a la figura del enriquecimiento sin justa causa dentro de la contratación estatal en Colombia, la cual ha sido desarrollada por la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado en varias sentencias de unificación y que la misma decisión de la Alta Corte ha traído una afectación para el orden jurídico y las premisas constitucionales en lo relativo a los principios como la confianza legitima, la buena fe, la moralidad pública y la justicia material, en lo respectivo al reclamo de honorarios por prestación de servicios profesionales cuando el contrato no se ha perfeccionado. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, la identificación del fallo para el presente estudio de caso denota los siguientes segmentos: Es una sentencia de unificación jurisprudencial en materia de enriquecimiento sin causa y de actio de in rem verso, mediante radicado 73001-23-31-000-2000- 03075-01(24897) con fecha de diecinueve (19) de noviembre de dos mil doce (2012), por parte del Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sala Plena, Sección Tercera y el Magistrado Ponente, el Doctor Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa.
The present case study brings up the analysis of the inconsistency in positions regarding the figure of enrichment without just cause within state contracting in Colombia, which has been developed by the jurisprudence of the Council of State in several rulings of unification and that the same decision of the High Court has brought an impact on the legal order and the constitutional premises in relation to principles such as legitimate trust, good faith, public morality and material justice, in relation to the claim of fees for the provision of professional services when the contract has not been perfected. Taking into account the above, the identification of the ruling for this case study denotes the following segments: It is a ruling of jurisprudential unification in matters of unjust enrichment and actio de in rem verso, through filing 73001-23-31-000 -2000- 03075-01(24897) dated November nineteen (19), two thousand twelve (2012), by the Council of State, Administrative Litigation Chamber, Plenary Chamber, Third Section and the Judge Rapporteur, the Doctor Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa.
The present case study brings up the analysis of the inconsistency in positions regarding the figure of enrichment without just cause within state contracting in Colombia, which has been developed by the jurisprudence of the Council of State in several rulings of unification and that the same decision of the High Court has brought an impact on the legal order and the constitutional premises in relation to principles such as legitimate trust, good faith, public morality and material justice, in relation to the claim of fees for the provision of professional services when the contract has not been perfected. Taking into account the above, the identification of the ruling for this case study denotes the following segments: It is a ruling of jurisprudential unification in matters of unjust enrichment and actio de in rem verso, through filing 73001-23-31-000 -2000- 03075-01(24897) dated November nineteen (19), two thousand twelve (2012), by the Council of State, Administrative Litigation Chamber, Plenary Chamber, Third Section and the Judge Rapporteur, the Doctor Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Contratación estatal, Enriquecimiento sin justa causa, Reparación directa, Actio in rem verso, Contrato de prestación de servicios
