Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorHerazo Beltrán, Yaneth
dc.contributor.advisorRíos, Paola
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Guette, Lilibeth
dc.contributor.authorQuintero Paz, Leydi
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T16:55:29Z
dc.date.available2021-09-10T16:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/8328
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: Evaluar el uso de los parques urbanos para la práctica de actividad física en Valledupar. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal en 4 parques de la ciudad. Se utilizó como herramienta de medición el SOPARC, para recolección de datos sobre: niveles de actividad física, género y curso de vida Se aplicó el Instrumento PARA, que evalúa las condiciones del parque, como: accesibilidad, utilización, supervisión y organización de actividades observadas. Resultados: En total se observaron 51750 visitantes que corresponde al 47% en mujeres y 53% en hombres. Se encontró que el nivel de actividad física (AF) de los masculinos fue superior al de las femeninas, con una mayor tendencia en adolescentes y adultos. El sexo masculino presentó un mayor nivel de actividad física moderado a vigoroso (73.43 %), el femenino registró un menor nivel (68,66%). También se evidenció mayor sedentarismo en mujeres con un 31,34% frente a 26,57% en hombres. Se evidenció en esta investigación las condiciones de los parques según el instrumento PARA el cual determinó que los escenarios son accesibles y utilizables. Conclusión: Este estudio demostró que una gran proporción de usuarios visitan los parques de todas las edades, porque son accesibles, aunque, estos espacios presentan bajos porcentajes en actividades supervisadas o con poca presencia de un funcionario o celador en muchas de las actividades, que al fomentarse, incrementarían considerablemente el uso de los parques, y también aumentarían los niveles de actividad física (AF). Este proyecto anima a las autoridades de la ciudad a continuar con políticas públicas que privilegien el parque como un escenario de promoción de la salud.spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: to evaluate the use of urban parks for the practice of physical activity in Valledupar. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in 4 city parks. The SOPARC was used as a measuring tool to collect data on: levels of physical activity, gender and life course The PARA Instrument was applied, which evaluates park conditions, such as: accessibility, use, supervision and organization of observed activities Results: In total 51750 visitors were observed, corresponding to 47% in women and 53% in men. It was found that the level of physical activity (AF) of males was higher than that of females with a higher tendency in adolescents and adults. The male sex presented a higher level of moderate to vigorous physical activity (73.43%), the female registered a lower level (68.66%). There was also a greater sedentary lifestyle in women with 31.34% compared to 26.57% in men. The conditions of the parks according to the instrument FOR which determined that the scenarios are accessible and usable were evidenced in this investigation. Conclusion: this study showed that a large proportion of users visit parks of all ages, because they are accessible, but these spaces have low percentages in supervised activities or with little presence of an official or guardian in many of the activities. they would increase the use of the parks considerably, and also increase the levels of physical activity (AF). This project encourages the city authorities to continue with public policies that privilege the park as a scenario for health promotion.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectActividad físicaspa
dc.subjectParquesspa
dc.subjectSedentarismospa
dc.subjectGénerospa
dc.subjectPhysical activityeng
dc.subjectUseseng
dc.subjectParkseng
dc.subjectSedentary lifestyleeng
dc.subjectGendereng
dc.titleEvaluación del uso de los parques para la práctica de actividad física en Valledupar, Colombiaspa
dcterms.referencesHaskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39:1423-34.eng
dcterms.referencesMartínez E, Saldarriaga JF, Sepúlveda FE. Actividad física en Medellín: desafío para la promoción de la salud. Rev. Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2008; 26(2): 117-23.eng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. Informe Sobre La Situación Mundial De Las Enfermedades No Transmisibles, 2014. Ginebra; 2014.spa
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva; 2009eng
dcterms.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar. Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional de Colombia, 2010. Bogotá; 2011.spa
dcterms.referencesGonzález SA, Castiblanco MA, Arias-Gómez LF, Martinez-Ospina A, Cohen DD, Holguin GA, et al. Results from Colombia 2014 Report Cardon Physical Activity For Children And Youth. J Phys Act Health. 2016; 13(11 Suppl 2): S129-S136eng
dcterms.referencesEvenson KR, Wen F, Metzger JS, Herring AH. Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns using accelerometry from a national sample of United States adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12(20): 1-13.eng
dcterms.referencesSallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health. 2006; 27: 297-22.eng
dcterms.referencesGómez L, Sarmiento OL, Parra D, Schmid T, Pratt M, Jacoby E. et al. Characteristics of the built environment associated with leisure-time physical activity among adults in Bogota, Colombia: a Multilevel Study. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(2): S193-S203.eng
dcterms.referencesBocarro JN, Floyd MF, Smith WR, Edwards MB, Schultz CL, Baran P., et al. Social and environmental factors related to boys' and girls' park-based physical activity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015; 18 (12): E97eng
dcterms.referencesBall K, Jeffery R, Crawford D, Roberts R, Salmon J, Timperio A. Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Preventive Medicine. 2008; 47: 294-98.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, McKenzie TL, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D, Lurie N. Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(3): 509-14.eng
dcterms.referencesJoseph RP, Maddock JE. Observational Park-based physical activity studies: A systematic review of the literature. Prev Med. 2016; 89: 257-77eng
dcterms.referencesVeitch J, Salmon J, Carver A, Timperio A, Crawford D, Fletcher E. et al. A natural experiment to examine the impact of park renewal on park-use and park-based physical activity in a disadvantaged neighborhood: the REVAMP study methods. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14 (600): 1-9.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Derose KP, Martinez H, Setodji C, et al. Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med (Baltim). 2010; 50 (Suppl 1): S9-12.eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. World health statistics 2017: monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social. Plan Decenal de Salud Pública 2012- 2021: La salud en Colombia la construyes tú. Bogotá D.C.; 2013.spa
dcterms.referencesTorrico E, Santín C, Andrés M, Menéndez S, López MJ. El modelo ecológico de Bronfrenbrenner como marco teórico de la Psicooncología. Anales de Psicología. 2002; 18 (1): 45-59.spa
dcterms.referencesBauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012; 380: 258-71.eng
dcterms.referencesFox KR, Hillsdon M, Sharp D, Cooper AR, Coulson JC, Davis M, et al. Neighbourhood deprivation and physical activity in UK older adults. Health & Place. 2011; 17: 633-640.eng
dcterms.referencesVan Dyck, Cardon G, Deforche B, Owen N, Sallis J, Bourdeaudhuij I. Neighborhood walkability and sedentary time in Belgian adults. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(1): 25-32.eng
dcterms.referencesCleland V, Ball K, Hume C, Timperio A, King A, Crawford D. Individual, social and environmental correlates of physical activity among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(12): 2011-2018.eng
dcterms.referencesVarela M, Duarte C, Salazar C, Lema L, Tamayo J. Actividad física y sedentarismo en jóvenes universitarios de Colombia: Prácticas, motivos y recursos para realizar. 2011; 42 (3): 269-277.spa
dcterms.referencesVélez C, Vidarte JA, Parra JH. Niveles de sedentarismo en población entre 18 y 60 años en Manizales, Pereira y Armenia, Colombia. Análisis multivariado. Aquichan. 2014; 14 (3): 303-315.spa
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Physical activity. Ginebra, Suiza; 2003.eng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Nota descriptiva. Actividad física. Ginebra, Suiza; 2018.spa
dcterms.referencesVidarte J, Vélez C, Sandoval C, Alfonso M. Actividad física: estrategia de promoción de la salud. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 2011; 16 (19): 202-218.spa
dcterms.referencesGarcía H, Lara F. Equidad en la provisión de espacios públicos abiertos: accesibilidad, percepción y uso entre mujeres de Hermosillo, Sonora. Sociedad y Ambiente. 2016; 4 (10): 28-56.spa
dcterms.referencesRepública de Colombia. Decreto 1504 de 1998. Manejo del espacio público en los planes de ordenamiento territorial. Bogotá D.C.; 1998.spa
dcterms.referencesCardona A, Ramírez A. Utilización del espacio público para la promoción de la actividad física. Manual Antioqueño de actividad física para la salud. Indeporte Antioquia. 2011, 33-37.spa
dcterms.referencesLaatikainen TE, Broberg A, Kytta M. The physical environment of positive places: Exploring differences between age groups. Prev Med. 2017; 95: 85-91.eng
dcterms.referencesTu H, Liao X, Schuller K, Cook a, Fan S, Lan G, et al. Insights from an observational assessment of park-based physical activity in Nanchang, China. Prev Med Rep. 2015; 2: 930-934.eng
dcterms.referencesEvenson KR, Jones SA, Holliday KM, Cohen DA, McKenzie TL. Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities). Prev Med. 2016; 86: 153-66.eng
dcterms.referencesSchultz CL, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Sayers SP, Thombs LA, Thomas IM. A longitudinal examination of improved access on park use and physical activity in a low-income and majority African American neighborhood park. Prev Med. 2017; 95: S95-S100.eng
dcterms.referencesBird ME, Datta GD, van Hulst A, Kestens Y, Barnett TA. A reliability assessment of a direct-observation park evaluation tool: the parks, activity and recreation among kids (PARK) tool. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15 (906): 1-8.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Han B, Derose K, Williamson S, Marsh T, Rudick J, et al. Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California city. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75 (12): 2317-25eng
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de la Protección Social. Departamento Administrativo del Deporte, la Recreación, la Actividad Física y el Aprovechamiento del Tiempo Libre, COLDEPORTES. Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del Deporte. Hábitos y Estilos de Vida Saludable. Tomo 2. Documento técnico con los contenidos de direccionamiento pedagógico para la promoción de hábitos de vida saludable, con énfasis en alimentación saludable y el fomento de ambientes 100% libres de humo de cigarrillo a través de la práctica regular de la actividad física cotidiana, dirigidos a los referentes de las entidades territoriales. Bogotá, Colombia, 2011spa
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Salud. Salud Pública. Resolución 578/2013. Créase el Programa Nacional de Lucha contra el Sedentarismo. Bogotá, Colombia. 2013.spa
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Han B, Nagel CJ, Harnik P, McKenzie TL, Evenson KR, et al. The first national study of neighborhood parks: Implications for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(4): 419-426.eng
dcterms.referencesChacón F, Corral JA, Ubago JL. Uso de espacios públicos para la práctica de actividad física. influencia de variables sociodemográficas en personas adultas. Journal of Sports Economics & Management. 2017; 7 (3): 120-129.spa
dcterms.referencesMcKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): reliability and feasibility measures. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2006; 3 (Suppl.1): S208–S222.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Setodji C, Evenson KR. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2011; 8(8): 1117–1123.eng
dcterms.referencesSarmiento OL, Ríos AP, Páez DC, Quijano K, Fermino RC. The recreovía of Bogotá, a community-based physical activity program to promote physical activity among women: Baseline Results of the Natural Experiment Al Ritmo De Las Comunidades. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(6): 1-15eng
dcterms.referencesFerreira A, Reis R, Ribeiro I, Parra D, Bronwnson R, et al. Utilizando Métodos De Observación Para Evaluar Los Espacios Públicos Al Aire Libre Y La Actividad Física En Brasil. journal of physical activity and health. 2010; (7);PP. 146-154spa
dcterms.referencesBeltrán V, Sierra A, Jiménez LA, González CD, Martínez GC, Cervelló E. Diferencias según género en el tiempo empleado por adolescentes en actividad sedentaria y actividad física en diferentes segmentos horarios del día. Retos. 2017; 31: 3-7.spa
dcterms.referencesRivera M. Los parques urbanos como indicadores de calidad de vida, símbolos de bienestar y espacios de uso recreativo: una investigación en Bucaramanga (Colombia). Rev. Univ. Empresa. 2014; 16(27): 207-229.spa
dcterms.referencesDerose KP, Han B, Williamson S, Cohen DA. Gender disparities in park use and physical activity among residents of high-poverty neighborhoods in Los Angeles. Womens Health Issues. 2018; 28(1): 6-13.eng
dcterms.referencesCasper JM, Harrolle MG, Kelley K. Gender differences in self-report physical activity and park and recreation facility use among Latinos in Wake County, North Carolina. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 45 (Suppl 1): 49-54eng
dcterms.referencesCronan MK, Shinew KJ, Schneider I, Stanis S, Chavez D. Physical activity patterns and preferences among Latinos in different types of public parks. J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5(6): 894-908.eng
dcterms.referencesLapham, S.C., Cohen, D.A., Han, B., Williamson, S., Evenson, K.R., McKenzie, T.L. and Ward, P.How important is perception of safety to park use? A four-city survey. Urban Studies. 2016; 53: 2624–2636eng
dcterms.referencesTimperio, A., Veitch, J., and Carver, A. Safety in numbers: Does perceived safety mediate associations between the neighborhood social environment and physical activity among women living in disadvantaged neighborhoods? Preventive Medicine. 2015; 74: 49–54.eng
dcterms.referencesJorgensen, L.J., Ellis, G.D., and Ruddell, E. Fear perceptions in public parks: Interactions of environmental concealment, the presence of people recreating, and gender. Environment and Behavior. 2013; 45: 803–820eng
dcterms.referencesStafford M, Cummins S, Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Marmot M. Gender differences in the associations between health and neighbourhood environment. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60 (8): 1681-1692.eng
dcterms.referencesHernández, E. Estudio de los circuitos biosaludables para la tercera edad en España. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 2009; 9(33), PP. 25-38.spa
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Han B, Nagel C, et al. The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity. American journal of preventive medicine. 2016;51(4): 419-426eng
dcterms.referencesCohen DA, Han B, Derose KP, Williamson S, Marsh T, Raaen L et al. The paradox of parks in low-income areas: park use and perceived threats. Environ Behav. 2016; 48(1): 230-245.eng
dcterms.referencesZaltauske V, Petrauskiene A. Associations between built environment and physical activity of 7–8-year-old children croaa sectional resolts from the Lithuanian. J. Medici 2016; 52(6) :366-371.eng
dcterms.referencesSallis J, Floyd M, Rodriguez D, Saelens B. The role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and CVD. Circulation. 2012; 125 (5):729-737eng
dcterms.referencesSantos AS, Page AR, Cooper CA, Ribeiro JC, Mota J. Perceptions of the built environment in relation to physical activity in Portuguese adolescents. Health Place. 2009; 15(2): 548-552.eng
dcterms.referencesSilva S, Petroski E, Reis R. Barriers to and facilitators of physical activity among public park visitors. Mot Jour Phys Edu. 2009: 219-227.eng
dcterms.referencesVidarte J, Vélez C, Aduen J. Niveles de sedentarismo en población entre 18 y 60 años: Sincelejo (Colombia). Salud Uninorte. 2015; 31(1), 70-77spa
dcterms.referencesPleson E, Nieuwendyk LM, Lee KK, Chaddah A, Nykiforuk CI, Schopflocher D. Understanding older adults' usage of community green spaces in Taipei, Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2014; 11(2):1444-1464eng
dcterms.referencesSarmiento O, Ríos A, Páez D, Quijano K, Fermino R. The Recreovía of Bogotá, a Community-Based Physical Activity Program to Promote Physical Activity among Women: Baseline Results of the Natural Experiment Al Ritmo de las Comunidades. Public health.2017; 14 (6), 623eng
dcterms.referencesFermino R, Reis R, Hallal PC, Kaczynski AT. ¿Who are the users of urban parks? A study with adults from. Curitiba, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2015; 12(1): 58-67.eng
dcterms.referencesMcCormack GR, Neighbourhood built environment characteristics associated with different types of physical activity in Canadian adults; Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 ;37(6):175-185.eng
dcterms.referencesBurrows E, O'Mahony M, Geraghty D. How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland, Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4): 1-11.eng
dcterms.referencesRossi A, Calogiuri G, Patterns and correlates of physical activity in adult Norwegians: a forecasted evolution up to 2025 based on machine learning approach. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1): 1-14.eng
dcterms.referencesShirreffs SM, Aragon-Vargas LF, Chamorro M, Maughan RJ, Serratosa L, Zachwieja. The sweating response of elite professional soccer players to training in the heat. Int J Sports Med. 2005; 26(2):90-95.eng
dcterms.referencesBlasco R. Acclimatization to Physical Exercise to Termal Stress. Medicina del Deporte 2012; 29 (148): 621-631.eng
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa
sb.programaMaestría en Actividad Física y Saludspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecspa
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.spaTrabajo de grado másterspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional