La racionalidad en los fallos de acciones de tutela contra decisiones judiciales
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Mercado de la Cruz, Elvira Margarita
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
La siguiente investigación pretende dar cuenta sobre la racionalidad planteada en los fallos de acción de tutela contra decisiones judiciales, tal propósito será posible a través de la formulación de la doctrina jurídica de estudiosos sobre el caso en concreto y de la Corte Constitucional, así como la jurisprudencia de esta misma corte y de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y sus manifestaciones sobre las acciones de tutelas contra decisiones judiciales, la racionalidad planteada en este trabajo de investigación plantea la condición para la toma de decisiones judiciales; basado en los criterios de autores para verificar la verdadera motivación y argumentación de fallos judiciales hasta reconocer la procedencia de la acción de tutela contra decisiones judiciales, para presentar como resultado que los fallos de acción de tutela contra decisiones judiciales son racionales si están ajustados al ordenamiento jurídico, a la argumentación. Lo anterior permite llegar a título de conclusión que, admitir que los jueces son argumentativos en sus decisiones, asegura que son racionales al fallar, sin la utilización de estos criterios por parte su parte, procede la solicitud de corrección de esta decisión, en su defecto, interponer la acción de tutela contra la decisión judicial perjudicial.
The following investigation is intended to account for the rationality raised in the decisions of action for protection against judicial decisions, such purpose will be possible through the formulation of the legal doctrine of scholars on the particular case and the Constitutional Court, as well as the jurisprudence of the same court and the Supreme Court of Justice and its statements on guardianship actions against judicial decisions , the rationality raised in this research work raises the condition for judicial decision-making; based on the criteria of authors to verify the true motivation and argumentation of judicial judgments until the source of the action for guardianship against judicial decisions is recognized, to present as a result that the decisions of action for protection against judicial decisions are rational if they are in line with the legal order, to the argumentation. . This makes it possible to conclude that, admitting that judges are argumentative in their decisions, ensures that they are rational in failing, without the use of those criteria on their part, the request for correction of that decision, failing that, is to bring an action for protection against the harmful judicial decision, must be made.
The following investigation is intended to account for the rationality raised in the decisions of action for protection against judicial decisions, such purpose will be possible through the formulation of the legal doctrine of scholars on the particular case and the Constitutional Court, as well as the jurisprudence of the same court and the Supreme Court of Justice and its statements on guardianship actions against judicial decisions , the rationality raised in this research work raises the condition for judicial decision-making; based on the criteria of authors to verify the true motivation and argumentation of judicial judgments until the source of the action for guardianship against judicial decisions is recognized, to present as a result that the decisions of action for protection against judicial decisions are rational if they are in line with the legal order, to the argumentation. . This makes it possible to conclude that, admitting that judges are argumentative in their decisions, ensures that they are rational in failing, without the use of those criteria on their part, the request for correction of that decision, failing that, is to bring an action for protection against the harmful judicial decision, must be made.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Racionalidad, Fallos, Acción de tutela, Decisiones judiciales, Rationality, Rulings, Guardianship action, Judicial decisions