Discrecionalidad de los nominadores para el retiro de un empleado de libre nombramiento y remoción
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Robles De La Rosa, Ana Carolina
Rivera Ortega, María Alejandra
Hernández Solís, Adalberto
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
Antecedentes: La discrecionalidad administrativa, ha sido una institución jurídica presente en la historia del derecho público, a partir de la Revolución Francesa, época en la que surgió, debido a la necesidad de otorgar mayor poder a la administración estatal y a fin de garantizar la protección de los derechos de los ciudadanos. La discrecionalidad administrativa ha sido una institución jurídica presente en la historia del derecho, sobre todo del derecho administrativo a partir de la Revolución Francesa, justificando dicha facultad por parte de las autoridades administrativas a la hora de ofrecer mayores garantías en la protección de los derechos de los ciudadanos, sin embargo dicha postura no puede ser de aplicación generalizada, menos cuando a través de ella se justifican acciones que pueden desencadenar en la vulneración de derechos como lo es el derecho al trabajo, así como los derechos conexos que de él se derivan. En el pleno ejercicio de las funciones contempladas en la norma básica fundamental y demás leyes regulatorias, las autoridades administrativas deben contar con cierto margen de discreción a la hora de tomar decisiones, sin embargo, también es cierto que en un Estado Social de Derecho esta debe ser la excepción y no la regla, por lo que debe analizarse de forma separada cada uno de los casos en los que tendría aplicabilidad dicha institución. Objetivos: El propósito central, es el abordar el tema de la discrecionalidad administrativa y acerca del debate en torno a la posibilidad de aplicación en la motivación en la declaración de insubsistencia de los empleados de libre nombramiento y remoción.
Background: Administrative discretion has been a legal institution present in the history of public law, starting with the French Revolution, when it arose, due to the need to grant greater power to the state administration and in order to guarantee protection of the rights of citizens. Administrative discretion has been a legal institution present in the history of law, especially administrative law since the French Revolution, justifying said power on the part of the administrative authorities when offering greater guarantees in the protection of the rights of citizens, however, this position cannot be of general application, less when through it actions are justified that can trigger the violation of rights such as the right to work, as well as the related rights derived from it. In the full exercise of the functions contemplated in the fundamental basic norm and other regulatory laws, the administrative authorities must have a certain margin of discretion when making decisions, however, it is also true that in a Social State of Law this must be the exception and not the rule, so each of the cases in which said institution would be applicable must be analyzed separately. Objectives: The main purpose is to address the issue of administrative discretion and about the debate around the possibility of application in the motivation in the declaration of non-subsistence of employees of free appointment and removal.
Background: Administrative discretion has been a legal institution present in the history of public law, starting with the French Revolution, when it arose, due to the need to grant greater power to the state administration and in order to guarantee protection of the rights of citizens. Administrative discretion has been a legal institution present in the history of law, especially administrative law since the French Revolution, justifying said power on the part of the administrative authorities when offering greater guarantees in the protection of the rights of citizens, however, this position cannot be of general application, less when through it actions are justified that can trigger the violation of rights such as the right to work, as well as the related rights derived from it. In the full exercise of the functions contemplated in the fundamental basic norm and other regulatory laws, the administrative authorities must have a certain margin of discretion when making decisions, however, it is also true that in a Social State of Law this must be the exception and not the rule, so each of the cases in which said institution would be applicable must be analyzed separately. Objectives: The main purpose is to address the issue of administrative discretion and about the debate around the possibility of application in the motivation in the declaration of non-subsistence of employees of free appointment and removal.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Administración, Discrecionalidad, Nombramiento, Motivación, Estado, Insubsistencia, Administration, Discretion, Appointment, Motivation, Status, Insubsistence