Autonomía del juez para la toma de la decisión frente a la comisión del delito de prevaricato por acción en Colombia durante los años 2015-2020
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Uribe González, Licett
Andrade Palacio, Luz Marina
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
La presente investigación abordó el análisis de la autonomía del juez para la toma de la decisión frente a la comisión del delito de prevaricato por acción, el cual se desarrolló en un lapso comprendido entre 2015- 2020, de manera que tiene como fin demostrar que el juez se encuentra limitado de alguna manera al tomar una decisión judicial, pues incide estar sujeto al imperio de la ley como también no apartarse del precedente judicial, so pena de que su conducta se pueda considerar como prevaricadora.
Desde la perspectiva teórica, la investigación proporciona un conocimiento que coadyuva a entender diferentes aspectos externos que menoscaban el principio de autonomía e independencia de la autoridad judicial y por ende ocasionan el deterioro en su integridad personal, así como también el buen nombre del funcionario si es investigado injustamente.
De igual manera brinda un aporte significativo a las áreas del conocimiento del derecho penal, pues orienta el actuar y análisis de los abogados y jueces al momento de argumentar decisiones judiciales. Los resultados de la investigación pueden tomarse como punto de partida para construir, entender y proporcionar explicaciones de cómo debe ser tomado el principio de autonomía e independencia judicial frente al delito de prevaricato por acción.
Es significativo revelar que, en cuanto a la práctica, esta investigación permite definir lineamientos a la hora de apartarse del precedente judicial sin estar inmiscuido en el
delito de prevaricato por acción, con el fin de que prevalezca en la autoridad judicial el principio de autonomía e independencia a la hora de tomar decisiones judiciales y fundamentarlas.
The present investigation addressed the analysis of the judge's autonomy for making the decision against the commission of the crime of prevarication by action, which took place in a period between 2015-2020, in order to demonstrate that the The judge is limited in some way when making a judicial decision, since it affects being subject to the rule of law as well as not deviating from the judicial precedent, on pain that his conduct can be considered as prevaricating. From a theoretical perspective, research provides knowledge that helps to understand different external aspects that undermine the principle of autonomy and independence of the judicial authority and therefore cause deterioration in his personal integrity, as well as the good name of the official if he is unfairly investigated. Likewise, it provides a significant contribution to the areas of knowledge of criminal law, as it guides the actions and analysis of lawyers and judges when arguing judicial decisions. The results of the investigation can be taken as a starting point to build, understand and provide explanations of how the principle of judicial autonomy and independence should be taken against the crime of prevarication by action. It is significant to reveal that, in terms of practice, this investigation allows defining guidelines when it comes to departing from judicial precedent without being involved in the crime of prevarication by action, so that the principle of autonomy and independence when making and substantiating judicial decisions.
The present investigation addressed the analysis of the judge's autonomy for making the decision against the commission of the crime of prevarication by action, which took place in a period between 2015-2020, in order to demonstrate that the The judge is limited in some way when making a judicial decision, since it affects being subject to the rule of law as well as not deviating from the judicial precedent, on pain that his conduct can be considered as prevaricating. From a theoretical perspective, research provides knowledge that helps to understand different external aspects that undermine the principle of autonomy and independence of the judicial authority and therefore cause deterioration in his personal integrity, as well as the good name of the official if he is unfairly investigated. Likewise, it provides a significant contribution to the areas of knowledge of criminal law, as it guides the actions and analysis of lawyers and judges when arguing judicial decisions. The results of the investigation can be taken as a starting point to build, understand and provide explanations of how the principle of judicial autonomy and independence should be taken against the crime of prevarication by action. It is significant to reveal that, in terms of practice, this investigation allows defining guidelines when it comes to departing from judicial precedent without being involved in the crime of prevarication by action, so that the principle of autonomy and independence when making and substantiating judicial decisions.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Autonomía, Prevaricato, Jueces, Independencia, Justicia, Autonomy, Prevaricate, Judges, Independence, Justice
