Incidencias de la implementación del procedimiento de notificación electrónica en la etapa admisoria del proceso de tutela
Cargando...
Fecha
2024
Autores
Ospino Jiménez, Carlos Andrés
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente artículo de investigación tiene la finalidad esencial de lograr determinar las incidencias
de la implementación del procedimiento de notificación electrónica en la etapa admisoria al interior
del proceso de tutela, específicamente respecto a la contabilización de los términos para el
cumplimiento de las órdenes proferidas en dicho estadio procesal; habida cuenta de la existencia
paralela del mecanismo de notificación física reglado primigeniamente por el legislador;
correspondiendo al juez elegir el medio más expedito para la efectividad del acto de notificación
de providencias a los sujetos procesales. El problema de investigación expuesto será desarrollado
a partir de un enfoque cualitativo documental, mediado por un análisis de contenido a las normas
que han regulado el mecanismo de notificación, con especial detalle en el procedimiento de
notificación electrónica, y la revisión exhaustiva de las posturas teóricas que han exteriorizado
precisiones doctrinales en torno a las temáticas relacionadas; metodología que será abordada en
consonancia con los preceptos constitucionales, legales y jurisprudenciales que han regulado de
manera específica la acción de tutela y su procedimiento. De tal manera que, la diferencia
constatable entre los mecanismos de notificación físico y electrónico, brindan a las autoridades
judiciales la posibilidad de comunicar de manera más eficiente las decisiones judiciales adoptadas
al interior de los asuntos que son puestos a su disposición, correspondiendo al juez constitucional
seleccionar el método más expedito para lograr el cumplimiento oportuno de sus providencias, en
aras de lograr la salvaguarda de los derechos fundamentales discutidos en los mismos.
This research article has the essential purpose of determining the incidences of the implementation of the electronic notification procedure in the admission stage within the guardianship process, specifically with respect to the accounting of the terms for compliance with the orders issued in said. procedural stage; taking into account the parallel existence of the physical notification mechanism originally regulated by the legislator; It is up to the judge to choose the most expeditious means for the effectiveness of the act of notification of orders to the procedural subjects. The exposed research problem will be developed from a qualitative documentary approach, mediated by a content analysis of the standards that have regulated the notification mechanism, with special detail in the electronic notification procedure, and the exhaustive review of the theoretical positions. that have externalized doctrinal precisions around related topics; methodology that will be addressed in accordance with the constitutional, legal and jurisprudential precepts that have specifically regulated the protection action and its procedure. In such a way that, the verifiable difference between the physical and electronic notification mechanisms, provides judicial authorities with the possibility of more efficiently communicating the judicial decisions adopted within the matters that are placed at their disposal, corresponding to the constitutional judge. select the most expeditious method to achieve timely compliance with its provisions, in order to achieve the safeguarding of the fundamental rights discussed therein.
This research article has the essential purpose of determining the incidences of the implementation of the electronic notification procedure in the admission stage within the guardianship process, specifically with respect to the accounting of the terms for compliance with the orders issued in said. procedural stage; taking into account the parallel existence of the physical notification mechanism originally regulated by the legislator; It is up to the judge to choose the most expeditious means for the effectiveness of the act of notification of orders to the procedural subjects. The exposed research problem will be developed from a qualitative documentary approach, mediated by a content analysis of the standards that have regulated the notification mechanism, with special detail in the electronic notification procedure, and the exhaustive review of the theoretical positions. that have externalized doctrinal precisions around related topics; methodology that will be addressed in accordance with the constitutional, legal and jurisprudential precepts that have specifically regulated the protection action and its procedure. In such a way that, the verifiable difference between the physical and electronic notification mechanisms, provides judicial authorities with the possibility of more efficiently communicating the judicial decisions adopted within the matters that are placed at their disposal, corresponding to the constitutional judge. select the most expeditious method to achieve timely compliance with its provisions, in order to achieve the safeguarding of the fundamental rights discussed therein.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Notificación física, Notificación electrónica, Proceso de tutela, Garantías constitucionales y tecnologías de la información, Physical notification, Electronic notification, Guardianship process, Constitutional guarantee and information technologies