Medición de la respuesta a la inducción y mortalidad en 414 pacientes con Nefritis Lúpica en la región Caribe Colombiana

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16eceng
dc.contributor.advisorGuido Musso, Carlos
dc.contributor.advisorAroca Martínez, Gustavo
dc.contributor.advisorGonzález Torres, Henry J.
dc.contributor.authorPeña Vargas, William Arturo
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T16:54:50Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T16:54:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: Evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento de inducción con dos esquemas de tratamiento uno con Mofetil Micofenolato (MMF) y otro con Ciclofosfamida (CFM) y la mortalidad en una serie de casos con NL en la región del Caribe colombiano. Método: Se realizó un estudio analítico con 414 pacientes con diagnóstico de NL clases III, IV y V confirmado por biopsia y tratados entre los años 2008-2020. Se evaluó la disminución de la Creatinina Serica (CrSr) y Proteinuria en 24 hrs (Prot24hrs), respuesta a tratamiento de inducción a la remisión (parcial o completa), así como la mortalidad y sus causas en los dos esquemas de tratamiento. Resultados: Se evaluaron 414 pacientes, de los cuales el 87% eran mujeres. La edad promedio fue de 37±13años. 324 fueron tratados con MMF y 90 CFM. La clase histológica predominante fue la clase IV (668.2%). La prot24hrs mostró una disminución en ambos esquemas, la Clase IV tratada con MMF mostró una disminución significativa (p: 0.0019). La CFM disminuyó significativamente la CrSr (p: 0.0025), especialmente en las Clases III (p: 0.0038) y IV (p: 0.0012); el MMF no disminuyó significativamente para este parámetro a excepción de la Clase V (0.0046). No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a la respuesta (remisión parcial o completa) entre esquemas, ni en la mortalidad o sus causas (p: 0.4215). Conclusiones: Ambos esquemas pueden utilizarse para la inducción en los pacientes con NL, tienen perfiles de efectividad y seguridad similares. La alta mortalidad por causas infecciosas indica la necesidad de realizar un mayor control sobre los pacientes y en la educación para la prevención de esta causa.spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the response to induction treatment with two treatment regimens, one with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and the other with Cyclophosphamide (CFM) and mortality in a series of cases with LN in the Colombian Caribbean region. Method: An analytical study was carried out with 414 patients with a diagnosis of LN classes III, IV and V confirmed by biopsy and treated between the years 2008-2020. The decrease in Serum Creatinine (CrSr) and Proteinuria in 24 hrs (Prot24hrs), response to remission induction treatment (partial or complete), as well as mortality and its causes in the two treatment schedules were evaluated. Results: 414 patients were evaluated, of which 87% were women. The mean age was 37 ± 13 years. 324 were treated with MMF and 90 CFM. The predominant histological class was class IV (668.2%). Prot24hrs showed a decrease in both regimens, Class IV treated with MMF showed a significant decrease (p: 0.0019). The CFM significantly decreased the CrSr (p: 0.0025), especially in Classes III (p: 0.0038) and IV (p: 0.0012); the MMF did not decrease significantly for this parameter except for Class V (0.0046). There were no significant differences in response (partial or complete remission) between regimens, nor in mortality or its causes (p: 0.4215). Conclusions: Both schemes can be used for induction in patients with LN, they have similar effectiveness and safety profiles. The high mortality from infectious causes indicates the need for greater control over patients and in education for the prevention of this cause.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4676164
dc.identifier.issn26107988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/7045
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.revistaavft.com/images/revistas/2021/avft_1_2021/17_medicion_respuesta.pdf
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesseng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceAVFT Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéuticaspa
dc.sourceVol. 40 N° 1, (2021)
dc.subjectNefritis lúpicaspa
dc.subjectInducciónspa
dc.subjectBiopsia renalspa
dc.subjectMicofenolatospa
dc.subjectCiclofosfamidaspa
dc.subjectMortalidadspa
dc.subjectLupus nephritiseng
dc.subjectInductioneng
dc.subjectRenal biopsyeng
dc.subjectMycophenolateeng
dc.subjectCyclophosphamideeng
dc.subjectMortalityeng
dc.titleMedición de la respuesta a la inducción y mortalidad en 414 pacientes con Nefritis Lúpica en la región Caribe Colombianaspa
dc.title.translatedMeasurement of the response to induction and mortality in 414 patients with Lupus Nephritis in the Colombian Caribbean regioneng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/othereng
dc.type.spaOtrosspa
dc.type.spaArtículo científicospa
dcterms.referencesKoutsokeras T, Healy T. Systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. 2014.eng
dcterms.referencesGurevitz SL, Snyder JA, Wessel EK, Frey J, Williamson BA. Systemic lupus erythematosus: A review of the disease and treatment options. Consult Pharm. 2013;28(2):110-121. doi:10.4140/TCP.n.2013.110eng
dcterms.referencesZubair A, Frieri M. Lupus nephritis: Review of the LITERATURE. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13(6):580-586. doi:10.1007/s11882-013-0394-4eng
dcterms.referencesMohan C, Putterman C. Genetics and pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(6):329-341. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2015.33eng
dcterms.referencesHahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(6):797-808. doi:10.1002/acr.21664eng
dcterms.referencesJr GM. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups . XII . Risk. 2014;(September 2001):152-160.eng
dcterms.referencesAroca-Martínez G. Propuesta de Un Modelo de Gestion de Salud de La Nefritis Lupica.; 2017.spa
dcterms.referencesCervera R, Khamashta M a, Font J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82(5):299-308. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55eng
dcterms.referencesAlmaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on Lupus Nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(5):825-835. doi:10.2215/CJN.05780616eng
dcterms.referencesWilhelmus S, Bajema IM, Bertsias GK, et al. Lupus nephritis management guidelines compared. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(6):904-913. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfv102eng
dcterms.referencesWakasugi D, Gono T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Frequency of class III and IV nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus without clinical renal involvement: An analysis of predictive measures. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(1):79-85. doi:10.3899/jrheum.110532eng
dcterms.referencesDall’Era M. Treatment of lupus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017;29(3):241-247. doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000000381eng
dcterms.referencesHoussiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D’Cruz D, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of lowdose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(8):2121-2131. doi:10.1002/art.10461eng
dcterms.referencesAroca-Martínez G, Depine S, Consuegra-Machado JR, González-Torres HJ, Árquez-Mendoza M, Estrada-García E. Development and use of an application programming interface modified from GoogleMaps© for the georeferencing of patients with glomerular disease. Nefrol publicación Of la Soc Española Nefrol. 2015;35(1):118-120. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014.Oct.12736eng
dcterms.referencesArnaud L, Fagot J-P, Mathian A, Paita M, Fagot-Campagna A, Amoura Z. Prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in France: A 2010 nation-wide population-based study. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(11):1082-1089. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.034eng
dcterms.referencesYacoub Wasef SZ. Gender differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Gend Med. 2004;1(1):12-17. doi:10.1016/s1550-8579(04)80006-8eng
dcterms.referencesOstensen M. Sex hormones and pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;876:131-143; discussion 144. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07630.xeng
dcterms.referencesCutolo M, Sulli A, Villaggio B, Seriolo B, Accardo S. Relations between steroid hormones and cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(10):573-577. doi:10.1136/ard.57.10.573eng
dcterms.referencesRiveros Frutos A, Casas I, Rúa-Figueroa I, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in Spanish males: a study of the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) cohort. Lupus. 2017;26(7):698-706. doi:10.1177/0961203316673728eng
dcterms.referencesRúa-Figueroa Í, Richi P, López-Longo FJ, et al. Comprehensive description of clinical characteristics of a large systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with emphasis on complete versus incomplete lupus differences. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(1):e267. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000267eng
dcterms.referencesTorrente-Segarra V, Salman Monte TC, Rúa-Figueroa I, et al. Juvenile- and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study in a large cohort from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 35(6):1047-1055. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28628467.eng
dcterms.referencesde Carvalho JF, do Nascimento AP, Testagrossa LA, Barros RT, Bonfá E. Male gender results in more severe lupus nephritis. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(10):1311-1315. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1151-9eng
dcterms.referencesRamírez Sepúlveda JI, Bolin K, Mofors J, et al. Sex differences in clinical presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):60. doi:10.1186/s13293-019-0274-2eng
dcterms.referencesTannor EK, Yeboah-Mensah K. Biopsy proven lupus nephritis in a black male patient in West Africa with systemic lupus erythematosus: case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:198. doi:10.11604/pamj.2018.31.198.14326eng
dcterms.referencesMohan S, Radhakrishnan J. Geographical variation in the response of lupus nephritis to mycophenolate mofetil induction therapy. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(3):233-241. doi:10.5414/cnp75233eng
dcterms.referencesAnaya J-M, Cañas C, Mantilla RD, et al. Lupus nephritis in Colombians: contrasts and comparisons with other populations. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;40(3):199-207. doi:10.1007/s12016-010-8249-4eng
dcterms.referencesKamitaki N, Sekar A, Handsaker RE, et al. Complement genes contribute sex-biased vulnerability in diverse disorders. Nature. 2020;582(7813):577- 581. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2277-xeng
dcterms.referencesBajema IM, Wilhelmus S, Alpers CE, et al. Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices. Kidney Int. 2018;93(4):789-796. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2017.11.023eng
dcterms.referencesAzoicăi T, Belibou IM, Lozneanu L, Giuşcă SE, Cojocaru E, Căruntu ID. Large variability of the activity and chronicity indexes within and between histological classes of lupus nephritis. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58(1):73-78. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523301.eng
dcterms.referencesHaladyj E, Mejía JC, Cervera R. Is the renal biopsy still necessary in lupus nephropathy? Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2016;23(2):69-72. doi:10.1016/j.rcreu.2016.04.001eng
dcterms.referencesBao H, Liu Z-H, Xie H-L, Hu W-X, Zhang H-T, Li L-S. Successful treatment of class V+IV lupus nephritis with multitarget therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(10):2001-2010. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007121272eng
dcterms.referencesGul H, Mushtaq MS, Salim B, Samreen S, Nasim A, Khan M. A Comparison Of Mycophenolate Mofetil And Cyclophosphamide As Lupus Nephritis Induction Therapy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(4):454-458. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225643.eng
dcterms.referencesRathi M, Goyal A, Jaryal A, et al. Comparison of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide with oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2016;89(1):235-242. doi:10.1038/ki.2015.318eng
dcterms.referencesMendonca S, Gupta D, Ali S, Gupta P. Mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide in indian patients with lupus nephritis: Which is better? A single-center experience. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2017;28(5):1069- 1077. doi:10.4103/1319-2442.215147eng
dcterms.referencesJiang Y-P, Zhao X-X, Chen R-R, Xu Z-H, Wen C-P, Yu J. Comparative efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment of lupus nephritis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(38):e22328. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022328eng
dcterms.referencesZhu B, Chen N, Lin Y, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil in induction and maintenance therapy of severe lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(7):1933-1942. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm066eng
dcterms.referencesLee YH, Woo J-H, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG. Induction and maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lupus. 2010;19(6):703-710. doi:10.1177/0961203309357763eng
dcterms.referencesDai C, Deng Y, Quinlan A, Gaskin F, Tsao BP, Fu SM. Genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus: immune responses and end organ resistance to damage. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;31:87-96. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2014.10.004eng
dcterms.referencesMageed RA, Prud’homme GJ. Immunopathology and the gene therapy of lupus. Gene Ther. 2003;10(10):861-874. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302016eng
dcterms.referencesSedhain A, Hada R, Agrawal RK, Bhattarai GR, Baral A. Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):175. doi:10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7eng
dcterms.referencesKamanamool N, McEvoy M, Attia J, Ingsathit A, Ngamjanyaporn P, Thakkinstian A. Efficacy and adverse events of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2010;89(4):227-235. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181e93d00eng
dcterms.referencesHogan J, Schwenk MH, Radhakrishnan J. Should mycophenolate mofetil replace cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for severe lupus nephritis? Kidney Int. 2012;82(12):1256-1260. doi:10.1038/ki.2012.203eng
dcterms.referencesKronbichler A, Brezina B, Gauckler P, Quintana LF, Jayne DRW. Refractory lupus nephritis: When, why and how to treat. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(5):510-518. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.03.004eng
dcterms.referencesLiberman AC, Druker J, Refojo D, Arzt E. [Molecular mechanisms of action of some immunosuppressive drugs]. Medicina (B Aires). 2008;68(6):455-464. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147430.eng
dcterms.referencesHerrmann DB, Bicker U. Drugs in autoimmune diseases. Klin Wochenschr. 1990;68 Suppl 2:15-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2198387.eng
dcterms.referencesMontiel D, Cacace P. Mortality and causes of death in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rev Paraguaya Reumatol. 2019;5(2):51-57. doi:10.18004/rpr/2019.05.02.51-57eng
dcterms.referencesTunnicliffe DJ, Palmer SC, Henderson L, et al. Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. June 2018. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002922.pub4eng
dcterms.referencesRamirez-Sandoval JC, Chavez-Chavez H, Wagner M, Vega-Vega O, Morales-Buenrostro LE, Correa-Rotter R. Long-term survival of kidney grafts in lupus nephritis: a Mexican cohort. Lupus. 2018;27(8):1303-1311. doi:10.1177/0961203318770527eng
dcterms.referencesAli OM, Sayed AA, Mohammed WS, Mohammed RR. Cardiovascular System Affection and Its Relation to First-Year Mortality in Patients Initiating Maintenance Hemodialysis. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:379-385. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S242549eng
dcterms.referencesKoutsokeras T, Healy T. Systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. 2014.eng
dcterms.referencesGurevitz SL, Snyder JA, Wessel EK, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus: A review of the disease and treatment options. Consult Pharm 2013;28:110–21. doi:10.4140/TCP.n.2013.110eng
dcterms.referencesZubair A, Frieri M. Lupus nephritis: Review of the LITERATURE. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2013;13:580–6. doi:10.1007/s11882-013-0394-4eng
dcterms.referencesMohan C, Putterman C. Genetics and pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2015;11:329–41. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2015.33eng
dcterms.referencesHahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:797–808. doi:10.1002/acr.21664eng
dcterms.referencesJr GM. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups . XII . Risk. 2014;:152–60.eng
dcterms.referencesAroca-Martínez G. Propuesta de un modelo de gestion de salud de la nefritis lupica. 2017.spa
dcterms.referencesCervera R, Khamashta M a, Font J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2003;82:299–308. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55eng
dcterms.referencesAlmaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on Lupus Nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12:825–35. doi:10.2215/CJN.05780616eng
dcterms.referencesWilhelmus S, Bajema IM, Bertsias GK, et al. Lupus nephritis management guidelines compared. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31:904–13. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfv102eng
dcterms.referencesWakasugi D, Gono T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Frequency of class III and IV nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus without clinical renal involvement: An analysis of predictive measures. J Rheumatol 2012;39:79–85. doi:10.3899/jrheum.110532eng
dcterms.referencesDall’Era M. Treatment of lupus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2017;29:241– 7. doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000000381eng
dcterms.referencesViana De Queiroz M. Lupus Eritematoso Sistemico. Acta Med Port 1994;7:343–8.spa
dcterms.referencespe Corona-Sanchez EG. Lupus eritematoso sistémico: implicaciones de la inmunidad innata. El Resid 2015;10:4–11.spa
dcterms.referencesGonzález V, González J. Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico (LES). Presentación de un caso. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Case presentation. 2017;4:75– 93.spa
dcterms.referencesXu R, Li Q, Liu R, et al. Association Analysis of the MHC in Lupus Nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:3383–94. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016121331eng
dcterms.referencesSociedad Mexicana de Alergia e Inmunología. RD, Carsolio-Trujano M, Herrera-Sánchez DA, et al. Revista alergia Mexico : organo oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Alergia e Inmunología, A.C. Rev Alerg México 1993;62:265–70.spa
dcterms.referencesZandman-Goddard G, Solomon M, Rosman Z, et al. Environment and lupusrelated diseases. Lupus 2012;21:241–50. doi:10.1177/0961203311426568eng
dcterms.referencesAringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1400–12. doi:10.1002/art.40930eng
dcterms.referencesCoronado Alvarado CD, Gámez Saiz IL, Sotelo Cruz N. Características clínicas y comorbilidades de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico en niños y adultos. Acta Pediátrica México 2018;1:1. doi:10.18233/apm1no1pp1- 121535spa
dcterms.referencesGalindo M, Molina RA, Álvarez JLP. Lupus eritematoso sistémico (I). Etiopatogenia. Manifestaciones clínicas. Historia natural. Pruebas diagnósticas. Diagnóstico diferencial. Med - Programa Form Médica Contin Acreditado 2017;12:1429–39. doi:10.1016/j.med.2017.01.001spa
dcterms.referencesMedlin JL, Hansen KE, Fitz SR, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cutaneous manifestations in late- versus early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;45:691–7. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.004eng
dcterms.referencesHejazi EZ, Werth VP. Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol 2016;17:135– 46. doi:10.1007/s40257-016-0173-9eng
dcterms.referencesKado R. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus for Primary Care. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 2018;45:257–70. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2018.02.011eng
dcterms.referencesNutan F, Ortega-Loayza AG. Cutaneous Lupus: A Brief Review of Old and New Medical Therapeutic Options. J Investig Dermatology Symp Proc 2017;18:S64–8. doi:10.1016/j.jisp.2017.02.001eng
dcterms.referencesCeccarelli F, Perricone C, Cipriano E, et al. Joint involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: From pathogenesis to clinical assessment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.022eng
dcterms.referencesKolasinski SL, Chi AS, Lopez-Garib AJ. Current Perspectives on Imaging for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Sclerosis, and Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2016;42:711–32. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2016.07.007eng
dcterms.referencesFava A, Petri M. Systemic lupus erythematosus : Diagnosis and clinical management. J Autoimmun 2019;96:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001eng
dcterms.referencesAcosta I, Avila G, Acosta M, et al. Manifestaciones clínicas y laboratoriales en el Lupus eritematoso sistemico- LES. 2016;14.spa
dcterms.referencesAlonso M. Lupus eritematoso sistémico. Epidemiología y presentación clínica en el noroeste de España. 2017.spa
dcterms.referencesGhahramani M, Nudy M, Ruzieh M. LUPUS IN THE HEART. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2617. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(19)33223-1eng
dcterms.referencesMiner JJ, Kim AHJ. Cardiac Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2014;40:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2013.10.003eng
dcterms.referencesSunjaya DB, Koster MJ, Osborn TG. 61-Year-Old Woman With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Chest Pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:153–8. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.04.034eng
dcterms.referencesTejeda-Maldonado J, Quintanilla-González L, Galindo-Uribe J, et al. Cirugía cardiaca en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico: características clínicas y desenlaces. Reumatol Clínica 2018;14:269–77. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2017.01.012spa
dcterms.referencesSamura T, Toda K, Yoshioka D, et al. Libman-Sacks Endocarditis Due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activation After Mitral Valve Plasty. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:e109–11. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.073eng
dcterms.referencesKotkar KD, Said SM. Libman-Sacks Endocarditis in a Patient With Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:e31–2. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.004eng
dcterms.referencesChazal T, Kerneis M, Guedeney P, et al. Coronary artery disease in systemic lupus: A case-controlled angiographic study. Autoimmun Rev 2020;19:102427. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102427eng
dcterms.referencesGiannelou M, Mavragani CP. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comprehensive update. J Autoimmun 2017;82:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2017.05.008eng
dcterms.referencesFernández-Nebro A, Rúa-Figueroa Í, López-Longo FJ, et al. Cardiovascular Events in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1183. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000001183eng
dcterms.referencesKe S-R, Liu C-W, Wu Y-W, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with poor outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2019;29:1400–7. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2019.08.006eng
dcterms.referencesFidler L, Keen KJ, Touma Z, et al. Impact of pulmonary disease on patientreported outcomes and patient-performed functional testing in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2016;25:1004–11. doi:10.1177/0961203316630818eng
dcterms.referencesMoqin Z. Shrinking Lung Syndrome as the Initial Manifestation of SLE. Chest 2016;149:A474. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.493eng
dcterms.referencesBuckley MM, Rabinovich CE. Pulmonary Manifestations of Rheumatic Diseases in Children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2021;68:147–66. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2020.09.005eng
dcterms.referencesAguilera-Pickens G, Abud-Mendoza C. Pulmonary Manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pleural Involvement, Acute Pneumonitis, Chronic Interstitial Lung Disease and Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2018;14:294–300. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2018.03.001eng
dcterms.referencesKokosi M, Lams B, Agarwal S. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome. Clin Chest Med 2019;40:519–29. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2019.06.001eng
dcterms.referencesGoswami RP, Mondal S, Lahiri D, et al. Shrinking lung syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus successfully treated with rituximab. QJM 2016;109:617– 8. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcw093eng
dcterms.referencesDuron L, Cohen-Aubart F, Diot E, et al. Shrinking lung syndrome associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: A multicenter collaborative study of 15 new cases and a review of the 155 cases in the literature focusing on treatment response and long-term outcomes. Autoimmun Rev 2016;15:994–1000. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.021eng
dcterms.referencesChaudhury D, Qureshi A, Prasad S, et al. Catatonia – An unusual presenting clinical manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Reumatol Clínica 2017;13:224–6. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2016.03.013eng
dcterms.referencesHanly JG. Attribution in the assessment of nervous system disease in SLE. Rheumatology 2015;54:755–6. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu458eng
dcterms.referencesBortoluzzi A, Scirè CA, Bombardieri S, et al. Development and validation of a new algorithm for attribution of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2015;54:891–8. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu384eng
dcterms.referencesJafri K, Patterson SL, Lanata C. Central Nervous System Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2017;43:531–45. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2017.06.003eng
dcterms.referencesGovoni M, Bortoluzzi A, Padovan M, et al. The diagnosis and clinical management of the neuropsychiatric manifestations of lupus. J Autoimmun 2016;74:41–72. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.013eng
dcterms.referencesHanly JG. Avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in neuropsychiatric lupus: the importance of attribution. Lupus 2017;26:497–503. doi:10.1177/0961203317690244eng
dcterms.referencesHanly JG. Diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014;10:338–47. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.15eng
dcterms.referencesChaves WG, Carrero NE, Tejeda MJ. Linfadenopatías generalizadas como primera manifestación de lupus eritematoso sistémico; un diagnóstico diferencial de enfermedad linfoproliferativa. Un reporte de dos casos. Rev Colomb Reumatol 2015;22:225–30. doi:10.1016/j.rcreu.2015.08.005eng
dcterms.referencesFayyaz A, Igoe A, Kurien BT, et al. Haematological manifestations of lupus. Published Online First: 2015. doi:10.1136/lupus-2014-000078eng
dcterms.referencesOurnal THEJ, Ediatrics OFP. Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review and Update. J Pediatr 2018;196:22-30.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.045eng
dcterms.referencesFernanda M, Ávila R, María L, et al. Manifestaciones relacionadas con alteraciones en la coagulación en lupus eritematoso sistémico de inicio juvenil . Reporte de casos y revisión de la literatura. Rev Colomb Reumatol 2020;27:190–201. doi:10.1016/j.rcreu.2019.01.002spa
dcterms.referencesPueyo-Asensio C, Saint Gerons Trecu M, Rubio Pérez MA, et al. Holmes-Adie syndrome as an early manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch la Soc Española Oftalmol (English Ed 2020;:11–4. doi:10.1016/j.oftale.2020.03.015eng
dcterms.referencesPalejwala N V., Walia HS, Yeh S. Ocular Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of the Literature. Autoimmune Dis 2012;2012:1–9. doi:10.1155/2012/290898eng
dcterms.referencesKnox Cartwright NE, Tole DM, Georgoudis P, et al. Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis and Corneal Melt. Cornea 2014;33:27–31. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000008eng
dcterms.referencesHéron E, Gutzwiller-Fontaine M, Bourcier T. Sclérites et épisclérites : prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique. La Rev Médecine Interne 2014;35:577– 85. doi:10.1016/j.revmed.2014.02.004eng
dcterms.referencesMd Noh UK, Zahidin AZA, Yong TK. Retinal vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus: an indication of active disease. Clin Pract 2012;2:54. doi:10.4081/cp.2012.e54eng
dcterms.referencesWu C, Dai R, Dong F, et al. Purtscher-like Retinopathy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;158:1335-1341.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.001eng
dcterms.referencesSilpa-archa S, Lee JJ, Foster CS. Ocular manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:135–41. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol- 2015-306629eng
dcterms.referencesBerman H, Rodríguez-Pintó I, Cervera R, et al. Rituximab use in the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: Descriptive analysis of the CAPS registry patients receiving rituximab. Autoimmun Rev 2013;12:1085–90. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.05.004eng
dcterms.referencesJara I. Puntos de encuentro entre la dermatología y la reumatología. Rev Chil Dermatol 2015;31:230–7.spa
dcterms.referencesKoo BS, Hong S, Kim YJ, et al. Lupus enteritis: clinical characteristics and predictive factors for recurrence. Lupus 2015;24:628–32. doi:10.1177/0961203314558858eng
dcterms.referencesBrewer BN, Kamen DL. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2018;44:165–75. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2017.09.011eng
dcterms.referencesZhang F, Zhang J, Zhou L, et al. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction as the initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37:176.e1-176.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.048eng
dcterms.referencesDelgado N. Nefritis lúpica. Med infant 2000;7:272–8.eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz-Irastorza G, Espinosa G, Frutos MA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Lupus nephritis: Consensus document from the systemic auto-immune disease group (GEAS) of the Spanish society of internal medicine (SEMI) and the Spanish society of nephrology (S.E.N.). Nefrologia 2012;32:1–45. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Dec.11298eng
dcterms.referencesMart GA, Gonz HJ. Nefritis lúpica.spa
dcterms.referencesPeñaranda P, Fernando L. Redalyc.Nefropatía lúpica. 2014.spa
dcterms.referencesNovillo Valdivieso MS, Ayala López IM, Mora Gonzalez MG, et al. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la nefritis lúpica. Recimundo 2019;3:410–27. doi:10.26820/recimundo/3.(3).septiembre.2019.410-427spa
dcterms.referencesHorta-Baas G, Camargo-Coronel A, Miranda-Hernández DG, et al. Renal Transplantation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison of Graft Survival With Other Causes of End-stage Renal Disease. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2019;15:140–5. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2018.10.012eng
dcterms.referencesSoliman WM, Sherif NM, Ghanima IM, et al. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratios in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Relation With Disease Activity and Lupus Nephritis. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2020;16:255–61. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2018.07.014eng
dcterms.referencesZurita Gavilanes L, Costa Valarezo A. Rituximab in Lupus Nephritis: A Nonsystematic Review. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2016;12:210–5. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2016.01.001eng
dcterms.referencesMorales E, Cánovas JM, Cavero T, et al. Afectación renal en las vasculitis, el lupus eritematoso y las enfermedades sistémicas. Med - Programa Form Médica Contin Acreditado 2015;11:4902–13. doi:10.1016/j.med.2015.06.012eng
dcterms.referencesMiranda-Hernández D, Cruz-Reyes C, Angeles U, et al. Prognostic Factors for Treatment Response in Patients With Lupus Nephritis. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2014;10:164–9. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2013.12.010eng
dcterms.referencesChowdhary VR. Broad Concepts in Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:744–61. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.007eng
dcterms.referencesFulgeri C, Carpio JD, Ardiles L. Lesiones renales en el lupus eritematoso diseminado: ausencia de relación entre datos clínicos e histológicos. Nefrología 2018;38:386–93. doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2017.11.016spa
dcterms.referencesPinto Peñaranda LF, Castro Mercado IL, Duque Caballero V, et al. Predictive Risk Factors for Failure to Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis in a Cohort of Colombian Patients. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed 2014;10:147–51. doi:10.1016/j.reumae.2013.12.011eng
dcterms.referencesKalloo S, Aggarwal N, Mohan P, et al. Lupus Nephritis: Treatment of Resistant Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:154–61. doi:10.2215/CJN.05870612eng
dcterms.referencesMartín-Gómez MA, Rivera Hernández F, Frutos Sanz MÁ, et al. Recomendaciones y sugerencias a 4 preguntas clave en nefropatía lúpica: Extracto de la guía de práctica clínica 2015. Nefrología 2016;36:333–8. doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2016.01.013spa
dcterms.referencesGuillén AVC, Rodríguez MLF. Protocol for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephropathy. Med 2019;12:4849–52. doi:10.1016/j.med.2019.06.015eng
dcterms.referencesLlanos L, Massardo L. Tratamientos Biológicos para Nefropa- tía Lúpica. 2015;31:11–4.spa
dcterms.referencesCurs G, Kumar P, Merino I, et al. Escola Universitària d ’ Infermeria Gimbernat. 2013;:1–97.spa
dcterms.referencesMofetilo M, En MFM, Lúpica N. PROTOCOLO PARA EL USO DE Código : CRFT / PRO / MNL / FIA / 122015. 2015.spa
dcterms.referencesBroen JCA, van Laar JM. Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus: mechanisms in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020;16:167–78. doi:10.1038/s41584-020-0374-8eng
dcterms.referencesGarcía MP. clínicas fuera de ficha técnica . Experiencia en un hospital de tercer nivel . 2019;:1–36.spa
dcterms.referencesHan ES, goleman, daniel; boyatzis, Richard; Mckee A. 済無No Title No Title. J Chem Inf Model 2019;53:1689–99.eng
dcterms.referencesFernández-García B, Martínez-Santana V, Ortega-Valín L, et al. Off-lable uses of mycophenolate mofetil: Lupus nephritis. Farm Hosp 2015;39:222–3. doi:10.7399/fh.2015.39.4.8135eng
dcterms.referencesPonticelli C, Escoli R, Moroni G. Does cyclophosphamide still play a role in glomerular diseases? Autoimmun Rev 2018;17:1022–7. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2018.04.007eng
dcterms.referencesCICLOFOSFAMIDA VERSUS MICOFENOLATO EN NEFRITIS LÚPICA HOSPITAL NACIONAL HIPÓLITO UNANUE 2015-2019. 2020.spa
dcterms.referencesBatista SER, Grass AV, Del E, et al. Cyclophosphamide in the systemic sclerosis treatment. Correo Científico Médico de Holguín 2015;19:1–12.eng
dcterms.referencesSehgal AR, Grey SF, DeOreo PB, et al. Prevalence, recognition, and implications of mental impairment among hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:41–9. doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90563-1eng
dcterms.referencesPedraza OL, Salazar AM, Sierra FA, et al. Pedraza, Salazar, Sierra, Soler, Castro, Castillo, Hernández, Piñeros, 2016 VALIDACIÓN MoCA bogota. Acta Medica Colomb 2016;41:221–8.spa
dcterms.referencesLoureiro C, García C, Adana L, et al. Use of the montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in Latin America: A systematic review. Rev Neurol 2018;66:397–408. doi:10.33588/rn.6612.2017508eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioneng
sb.programaEspecialización en Nefrologíaspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos