Factores determinantes en el surgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicos en ciudades intermedias como Valledupar en el departamento del Cesar, Colombia

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Ospino, Luis E.
dc.contributor.advisorAmar Sepúlveda, Paola
dc.contributor.authorRamos Camargo, Jose Luis
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T19:04:57Z
dc.date.available2024-12-03T19:04:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractEste análisis multidimensional destaca la interrelación entre sí del proceso emprendedor (meso) y las condiciones del entorno (macro), y eso se debe a que existe una naturaleza dinámica y contextual del proceso emprendedor, por los que este fenómeno depende del contexto, y la capacidad de los emprendedores para adaptarse a los cambios dinámicos del entorno; subrayando que no existe un marco y modelo unificado ni general y ni universal para explicar y comprender el surgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicos en estos contextos (Moroz & Hindle, 2012). De esta manera, la presente investigación aporta una novedad significativa al intentar estudiar un tema vibrante y complejo que se encuentra en las agendas de los gobernantes a nivel LATAM, y en los debates científicos por parte de los académicos en cuanto a al desafío de aumentar la frontera de conocimiento para comprender este fenómeno de investigación en el campo conceptual y empírico en economías emergentes como Colombia. En suma importancia, brinda una utilidad teórica relevante y pertinente en cuanto pretende construir un marco conceptual compresible y explicativo del fenómeno del emprendimiento tecnológico (complejo y multidimensional) particularmente en contextos emergentes y ciudades intermedias en donde particularmente existen factores del entorno, culturales, sociales, regulatorios, que habilitan y obstaculizan el surgimientos de nuevas formas empresariales de base tecnológica y de innovación; sin olvidar la heterogeneidad que tienen los emprendedores, las industrias y los mercados en economías emergentes como Colombia y en la región de América Latina. En este sentido, investigar desde los preceptos de Economía, Emprendimiento y Gestión Empresarial —en un país emergente como Colombia y en una ciudad intermedia como Valledupar— es una oportunidad para realizar un aporte significativo al conocimiento, al buscar llenar vacíos teóricos relacionados con los factores determinantes en el surgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicos. Sin duda, los resultados y conclusiones de esta investigación generan oportunos cuestionamientos y planteamientos a nivel científico y pragmático, en términos de profundizar y ampliar la frontera de conocimiento de estos tópicos, que singularmente son de vital importancia para las agendas de los países de Latinoamérica como Colombia, y que, desde la perspectiva de los académicos, es una oportunidad de generar de conocimiento útil y aplicado a resolver problemas de la sociedadspa
dc.description.abstractThe empirical findings reveal the multidimensional nature of this phenomenon. Macro-level factors, such as financial support, government policies, R&D and innovation (R&D+I) transfer mechanisms, infrastructure, and socio-cultural norms, play critical roles. At the meso level, participation in entrepreneurship programs and experience in entrepreneurship and R&D+I activities are pivotal. Micro-level factors, including the specific characteristics of entrepreneurs, further enrich this dynamic. Together, these levels interact structurally and dynamically to shape technological entrepreneurship. This highlights the interconnectedness between entrepreneurial processes (meso) and environmental conditions (macro), reinforcing the contextual and adaptive nature of entrepreneurship. These insights support the view that no unified, universal framework can adequately explain the emergence of technological ventures in such contexts (Moroz & Hindle, 2012). This research offers a novel contribution by addressing a complex and vibrant topic central to policy agendas across Latin America and academic debates on technological entrepreneurship in emerging economies. The study seeks to construct a conceptual framework that comprehensively explains this multifaceted phenomenon, particularly in intermediate cities where environmental, cultural, social, and regulatory conditions either facilitate or hinder entrepreneurial activity. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the heterogeneity of entrepreneurs, industries, and markets within emerging economies like Colombia, providing relevant theoretical and practical insights. By integrating perspectives from economics, entrepreneurship, and business management, this research aims to fill theoretical gaps and provide empirical evidence regarding the determinants of technological venture creation in intermediate cities. The findings will generate valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars, advancing the knowledge frontier on this critical subject. This study has the potential to inform actionable strategies to address societal challenges and foster innovation-driven growth in Latin America.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16032
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectEmprendimiento tecnológicospa
dc.subjectSurgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicosspa
dc.subjectFactores macro, meso y microspa
dc.subjectEconomías emergentesspa
dc.subjectCiudades intermedias.spa
dc.subject.keywordsTechnological entrepreneurshipeng
dc.subject.keywordsEmergence and creation of technological ventureseng
dc.subject.keywordsMacro, meso and micro factorseng
dc.subject.keywordsEmerging economieseng
dc.subject.keywordsIntermediate citieseng
dc.titleFactores determinantes en el surgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicos en ciudades intermedias como Valledupar en el departamento del Cesar, Colombiaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.spaTesis de doctorado
dcterms.referencesAaltonen, A. (2016). Factors Shaping Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and the Rise of Entrepreneurship: A View from Top Management. Journals. Helsinki: Demos Helsinki.eng
dcterms.referencesAdler, P., Florida, R., King, K., & Mellander, C. (2019). The city and high-tech startups: the spatial organization of schmpeterian entrepreneurship. Cities: the international journal of urban policy and planning, 121-130.eng
dcterms.referencesAldrich, H. (2000). Organizations Evolving. Cambridge: Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesAldrich, H. E. (1990). sing an ecological perspective to study organizational founding rates. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 14(3), 7-24.eng
dcterms.referencesALEISA, E. (2012-2013). Startup Ecosystems: Study of the Ecosystems Around the World; Focusing on Silicon Valley - Toronto and Moscow. Obtenido de http://www.janrecker.com/wpcontent/ uploads/2013/02/20130213_FinalReport_Startup-Ecosystems.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesAmara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google scholar rather than the web of science. Scientometrics, 93, 553-581eng
dcterms.referencesAnju, Z. (2014). Startup Capitals: Discovering the Global Hotspots of Innovation. Gurgaon. India: Random House.eng
dcterms.referencesAntonelli, C. (2019). Schumpeterian growth regimes. En: Audretsch D., E. Lehmann y A. Link (Eds.). A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Edwar Elgar Publishing Inc., 4-29.eng
dcterms.referencesArruda, C., Nogueria, V. S., & Costa, V. (2013). The Brazilian Entrepreneurial Ecosystem of Startups: An Analysis of Entrepreneurship Determinants in Brazil as Seen from the OECD. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17-57.eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. & Acs, Z. . (1994). New firm startup, technology, and macroeconomic fluctuations. Small Business Economic 6, 439–449.eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1030-1051.eng
dcterms.referencesBailetti, T. (2012). Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5-12.eng
dcterms.referencesBailetti, T., Hudson, D., & Bot, S. D. (2012). An Overview of Four Issues on Technology Entrepreneurship in the TIM Review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 28-34.eng
dcterms.referencesBala, S. (2015). New Generation Startups in India: What Lessons Can We Learn from the Past? Economic and Political Weekly, 56-63.eng
dcterms.referencesBarney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.eng
dcterms.referencesBecker, A., Knyphausen-AufseB & Brem, A. (2015). Beyong traditional development models: A fresh perspective on entrepreneurial new venture creation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 152-172.eng
dcterms.referencesBegley, T. M., Tan, W. L., & Schoch, H. (2005). Cultural dimensions of entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 494-504.eng
dcterms.referencesBhave, M. P. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of business venturing, 9(3), 223- 242.eng
dcterms.referencesBird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas. The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.eng
dcterms.referencesBlank, S. (20 de Marzo de 2024). Steve Blank. Obtenido de Steve Blank: https://steveblank.com/2010/04/12/why-startups-are-agile-andopportunistic-% E2%80%93-pivoting-the-business-model/eng
dcterms.referencesBlank, S. (2010). Why Start-ups are Agile and Opportunistic Pivoting the Business Model.eng
dcterms.referencesBrockhoff, K., & Guan, J. (1996). Innovation via new ventures as a conversion strategy for the Chinese defense industry. R& D Management, 49-56.eng
dcterms.referencesBryne, B.M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesCámara de Comercio de Valledupar. (2022). Estudios socioeconómico del Valle del Río Cesar. Valledupar: Observatorio Económico.spa
dcterms.referencesCámara de Comercio de Valledupar. (2023). Informe de rendición de cuenta. Valledupar, Cesar.spa
dcterms.referencesCámara de Comercio de Valledupar. (2024). Contexto macroeconómico. Valledupar, Cesar: Observatorio Socioeconómico.spa
dcterms.referencesCámara de Comercio De Valledupar. (2024). Encuesta Entorno Empresarial I trimestre. Valledupar, Cesar: Observatorio Socieconomicospa
dcterms.referencesCampbell, J., & De Nardi, M. (2009). A conversation with 590 nascent entrepreneurs. Annals of finance, 313-340.eng
dcterms.referencesCarter, N M; Gartner, W B; Reynolds, P. (1996). Exploring Start-Up Event Sequences. Journal of business venturing, 11(3), 151-166eng
dcterms.referencesCarter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. (1996). Exploring Start-Up Event Sequences. Journal of business venturing, 11(3), 151-166.eng
dcterms.referencesChesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 354-363eng
dcterms.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad. (2023). Índice Departamental de Competitividad. Universidad del Rosario.spa
dcterms.referencesCooper, A. C. & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1981). A new look at business entrey: Experiences of 1805 entrepreneurs. Frontiers of entreprenerushio reserach, 1-20.eng
dcterms.referencesCooper, C. A. & Komives, L. J. (1970). Technical Entrepreneurship. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Center for Venture Management.eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. D. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE Publications, Inceng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, Jhon. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Londres: Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesDavidsson, P. & Gordon, S. (2012). Panel Studies of new venture creation: methodsfocused review and suggestions for future research. Small Business Economics, 853-876.eng
dcterms.referencesDimov, D. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 1123-1153.eng
dcterms.referencesDorf, R. C. & Byers, T.H. (2005). Technology Ventures: from idea to enterprise. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.eng
dcterms.referencesDushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947-965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.488eng
dcterms.referencesEdelman, L., & Yli-Renko, H. (2010). The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venture- creation efforts: bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 833- 856.eng
dcterms.referencesEslava, M., Meléndez, M., & Perry, G. (2014). "Notas sobre Política de Desarrollo Productivo en Colombia, "Universidad de los Andes –Facultad de Economía – CEDE. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.spa
dcterms.referencesEver, N. (2003). The Process and Problems Of Business Start-Ups. The ITB Journal, 4(1), 17-41.eng
dcterms.referencesFederico, J., Ibarra García, S. & Kantis, H. (2019). Enfoque sistémicos del emprendimiento: estado del arte y desafíos conceptuales en Suarez, D.; Erbes, A.; Barletta, F. (SD) (Comp). Teoría de la innovación: evolución, tendencias y desafíos. Buenos Aires - Madrid: UNGS-UCM.spa
dcterms.referencesFeuer, M., Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific Culture and Education Research. Educational Researcher, 4-14.eng
dcterms.referencesField, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed). SAGE Publicationseng
dcterms.referencesForo Económica Mundial. (2016). The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: FEM.eng
dcterms.referencesFoster, G., & Shimizu, C. (2013). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Cologny, Switzerlandeng
dcterms.referencesFranco, A., Sarkar, M., Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R. (2009). Swift and Smart: the moderating effects of technological capabilities on the market Pioneeringfirm survival relationship. Managerial Science, 1842-1860.eng
dcterms.referencesGarcia-sanchez, E., Garcia-Morales, V., Martin-Rojas, R. (2018). Analysis of the influence of the environmetn, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skill on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and management, 345-377.eng
dcterms.referencesGartner, W. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomena of venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 696-706.eng
dcterms.referencesGarud, R. & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2eng
dcterms.referencesGenescá, E., & Veciana, J. (1984). Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas. Información Comercial Española, 611, 132-150.spa
dcterms.referencesGibb, D. (1994). The Entrepreneurship Grid: An Australian Application of Entrepreneurship for Education, 36(8), . Education + Training, 36(8), 23-31.eng
dcterms.referencesGiones, F. & Brem, A. (2017). Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 44-51.eng
dcterms.referencesGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2023). Actividad empresarial en Colombia 2022 - 2023: En camino hacia la reactivación. Cali, Colombia: Editorial Universidad Icesi.spa
dcterms.referencesGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2022). Actividad empresarial en Colombia 2022 - 2023: En camino hacia la reactivación. Santiago de Cali, Colombia: Editorial Universidad Icesispa
dcterms.referencesGlobal Entrepreneurship Network (GEN). (2022). Global Startup Ecosystem Index. Londres: Startup Blink.eng
dcterms.referencesGranovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 01(3), 481-510.eng
dcterms.referencesGruber, M., MacMillan, I., & Thompson, J. D. (2008). Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms. Management Science, 54(9), 1652-1655. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0877eng
dcterms.referencesHallward-Driemeier, M. & Nayyar, G. (2018). Trouble in the making? The future of manufacturing-Led Development. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Group.eng
dcterms.referencesHannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1997). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 929-964.eng
dcterms.referencesHansen, G. S. (1991). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111eng
dcterms.referencesHatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. OCED Science, Technology and Industryeng
dcterms.referencesHelm, R., Mauroner, O. & Pohlmann, K. (2018). Towards a better understanding of performance measurements: the case of research-based spin offs. Review of Managerial Science, 135-166eng
dcterms.referencesHemmert, M., Cheng, Y., Kohlbacher, F., Kotosaka, M., & Waldnberger, F. (2016). High-tech Startup Ecosystems in East Asian Agglomerations: Are They Different from the West? Tokyo: German Institute of Japanese Studies.eng
dcterms.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R. (2008). METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN: LAS RUTAS CUANTITATIVA, CUALITATIVA Y MIXTA. México DF: Mcgraw Hilspa
dcterms.referencesHood, J. N., & Young, J. E. (1993). Entrepreneurship’s requisite areas of development: A survey of top executives in successful entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 115-135.eng
dcterms.referencesHuberman, M., & Miles, M. (1994). Métodos para el manejo y análisis de datos”, en Norman Denzin & Yvonnas Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage publications.spa
dcterms.referencesHunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2003). Multimethod Research in Sociology». En Abbas Tashakkori y Charles Teddlie (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. . California: Thousand Oakseng
dcterms.referencesIbarra Garcia, S., Kantis, H., & Ortíz, M. (2018). ¿El ecosistema o los ecosistemas? Primeras evidencias de un ejercicio de tipologías sobre ciudades de la Provincia de Santa Fe (Argentina). Revista para emprendedores de pequeñas empresas.spa
dcterms.referencesIsenberg, D. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.eng
dcterms.referencesIsenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, invited presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, Dublin, Ireland, May 12.eng
dcterms.referencesJohnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 14-26.eng
dcterms.referencesJones-Evans, D. (1995). A typology of technology-based entrepreneurs: a model based on previous occupational background. Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26-47.eng
dcterms.referencesKantis, H; Angelelli, P; Moori, Koenig V. (2004). Desarrollo Emprendedor: América Latina y la experiencia internacional. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.spa
dcterms.referencesKantis, H., & Angelelli, P. (2020). Los ecosistemas de emprendimiento de América Latina y el Caribe frente al COVID-19: Impactos, necesidades y recomendaciones. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollospa
dcterms.referencesKantis, H., Federico, J., Ibarra García, S., & Menéndez, C. (2022). Emprendimiento digital en ciudades intermedias. Elementos conceptuales y estrategias de desarrollo en la postpandemia. CIPPEC.spa
dcterms.referencesKantis, H., Ishida, M. & Komori, Masahiko, K. (2002). Empresarialidad en economías emergentes: Creación y desarrollo de nuevas empresas en América Latina y el Este de Asia. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID) .spa
dcterms.referencesKantis. (2018). Grandes empresas y startups: ¿Nuevo modelo de innovación? Prodem, BID y Wayraspa
dcterms.referencesKatz, J., & Gartner, W. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of management review, 13(3), 429-441.eng
dcterms.referencesKerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H. B. (2002). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed) . Harcourt College Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesKhajeheian, D. (2014). A Perspective on Media Entrepreneurship Policy: Globalization of Knowledge and Opportunities for Developing Economies. Journal of Globalization Studies, 5(2), 174-187.eng
dcterms.referencesKirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKothari, C. R. (2008). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Fourth Edition. New Delhi: New Age International Publishereng
dcterms.referencesKuratko, D. F., Morris, M. H., & Schindehutte, M. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 1-13.eng
dcterms.referencesLanciano-Morandat, C., & Verdier, E. (2010). Multi-level Perspectives: A Comparative Analysis of National R&D Policies. The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government, 12, 218-242.eng
dcterms.referencesLarson, A. & Starr, J. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5-16.eng
dcterms.referencesLichtenstein, B. B., Dooley, K. J., & Lumpkin, G. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 153-175eng
dcterms.referencesLim, S. S. (2008). An exploratory study on manufacturing strategy formulation in start-up companies. Cambridge: Springereng
dcterms.referencesLittle A. D. (1977). New Technology-based firms in the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany. Anglo-German Foundation for the study of industrial Society.eng
dcterms.referencesLiu, T., Chu, Y., Hung, S. & Wu, S. (2005). Technology entrepreneurial styles: a comparison of UMC and TSMC. International Journal of technology Management, 92-115.eng
dcterms.referencesLlop, J., Iglesias, B., Vargas, R., & Blanc, F. (2019). Las ciudades intermedias: concepto y dimensiones. Ciudades, 22, 23-43.spa
dcterms.referencesLundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Printer Publishers, London.eng
dcterms.referencesMajdouline, I., Elbaz, J., & Jebli, F. (2022). Revisiting technological entrepreneurship research: An updated bibliometric analysis of the state of art. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179(6). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121589eng
dcterms.referencesMartin-Rojas, R., Fernandez-Perez, V., Garcia-sanchez, E.. (2017). Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distintive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 397-426eng
dcterms.referencesMartin-Rojas, R., Garcia-Morales, V., Bolivar-Ramos, M. (2013). Influence of technological support, skills and competencies, and learning on corporate entrepreneurship in european technology firms. Technovation, 417-430.eng
dcterms.referencesMarullo, C., Casprini, E., Di Minin, A., Piccaluga, A. (2018). Ready for take-off: how Open Innovation influences Startup success. Creativity, Innovation, management, 476-488eng
dcterms.referencesMichelini, J., & Davies, C. (2009). Ciudades intermedias y desarrollo territorial: un análisis exploratorio del caso argentino. Documentos de Trabajo GEDEUR(5).spa
dcterms.referencesMontenegro E. D. (abril de 2021). Ciudades Intermedias como Instrumento para el Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible e Innovador. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). Obtenido de https://blog.iica.int/blog/ciudades-intermedias-como-instrumento-paradesarrollo- territorial-sostenible-e-innovadorspa
dcterms.referencesMoreno Cuello, J. L., & Ramos Camargo, J. L. (2013). Factores determinantes de la creación de empresas de base tecnológica en Colombia. Revista de Economía del Caribe, (12), 1-28.spa
dcterms.referencesMoreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F., (2021). Introducing the 15-minute city: sustainability, resilience and place identity in future postpandemic cities. Smart Cities, 93-111.eng
dcterms.referencesMoroz, P. W., & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives.,. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781-818.eng
dcterms.referencesMorse, J. M. (2003). Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design En Abbas Tashakkori y Charles Teddlie (eds.) . California: Handbook of mixed methods in social.eng
dcterms.referencesNdonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281-289.eng
dcterms.referencesNewman, M., Zuellig, A., Constantino, M., & Kachin, K. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 215-233.eng
dcterms.referencesNichols, S. P. & Armstrong, N. E. (2003). Engineering Entrepreneurship: does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education? IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 134-138.eng
dcterms.referencesNuñez, L. (2007). The process and problems of business start-ups. Pensamiento y gestion, 232-255eng
dcterms.referencesPadgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The problem of emergence: The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton University Presseng
dcterms.referencesPathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., Laplume, A. (2013). Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment; and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 2090-2101.eng
dcterms.referencesPeña, I. (2021). TECNOLATINAS: THE LAC STARTUP ECOSYSTEM COMES OF AGE. IDB LAB.eng
dcterms.referencesPetti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17468771111105631eng
dcterms.referencesPiscione, D. P. (2013). Secrets of Silicon Valley: What Everyone Else Can Learn from the Innovation Capital of the World. London: Macmillan.eng
dcterms.referencesPorter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-93.eng
dcterms.referencesRadosevic, S. & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entreprenurial Propensity of innovation systems: theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 1015-1038.eng
dcterms.referencesRomer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5).eng
dcterms.referencesRoundy, P. T. (2017). Small town entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 238-262.eng
dcterms.referencesRueda, I., Fernández-Laviada, A., & Herrero, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27(2), 284-315.eng
dcterms.referencesRuef, M. (2005). Origins of organizations: The entrepreneurial process. Research in the Sociology of Work, 63-100eng
dcterms.referencesSalamzadeh, A; Kirby, David A. (2017). New Venture Creation: How Start-Ups Grow? 9-29.eng
dcterms.referencesSalamzadeh, A. (2015). New Venture Creation: Controversial Perspective and Theories. Economic Analysis journal, 101-109.eng
dcterms.referencesSalamzadeh, A., & Kesim, H. K. (2015). Start-up Companies: Life Cycle and Challenges. 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE), (pág. 32). Belgrade, Serbia.eng
dcterms.referencesSandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 226-233.eng
dcterms.referencesSchumpeter, J.M. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.eng
dcterms.referencesSchumpeter, J.M. (1934). The theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesSchwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum.eng
dcterms.referencesScuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., Garcia-Perez, A., Orlando,B., Ciampi, F. (2019). A spill over effect of entrepreneurial orientation on technological innovativeness: an outlook of universities and research-based spin off. Journal of technological Transfer, 1634-1654.eng
dcterms.referencesShane, S. & Venkataraman S. (2004). Guest editor’s introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 181-184eng
dcterms.referencesShane, S. A. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: the individualopportunity. Nexus Edawrd Elgar Publishing. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781007990eng
dcterms.referencesShearman, C. & Burrell, G. (1988). New technology-based firms and the emergence of new industries: some employment implications. New Technology, Work and Employment , 87-99.eng
dcterms.referencesSimon E. K. (2003). La creación de empresas de base tecnológica: Una experiencia práctica. KENspa
dcterms.referencesSpigel, B. (2015). The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167eng
dcterms.referencesSpigel, B., & Bathelt., H. (2011). University spin-offs, entrepreneurial environment and start- up policy: The cases of Waterloo and Toronto (Ontario) and 206 Columbus (Ohio). 2 (2):202. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 202-214eng
dcterms.referencesStorey, D., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. esearch Policy, 933-946.eng
dcterms.referencesThe Canadian Academy of Engineering. (1998). Wealth through Technological Entrepreneurship. Engineering Issues, 1-2.eng
dcterms.referencesThurkral, I.S., Von Ehr, J., Walsh, S., Groen, A. J. Vn Der Sijde, P., & Akmaliah Adham, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship, Emerging Technologies, Emerging Markets. International Small Business Journal, 101-116.eng
dcterms.referencesTimmons, J. A. (1982). New Venture Creation: models and methodologies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentices-Hall.eng
dcterms.referencesTodd, N., & Lobeck. (2004). Los métodos mixtos. Mcgraw Hill.eng
dcterms.referencesTony Bailetti. (2012). Tecnology Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5-12.eng
dcterms.referencesTripathi, S. & Brahma, M. (2018). Techonology Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: An exploration of Entrepreneurial Models Prevalent in India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 24-32.eng
dcterms.referencesUman, L.S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 57-59eng
dcterms.referencesUrbano, D., Guerrero, M., Ferreria, J. Fernandes, C. (2019). New Technology entrepreneurship initiatives: which strategic orientations and environmentalconditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape? Journal of Technological Transfer, 1577-1602.eng
dcterms.referencesVan de Ven, A.H., Roger, H., & Dean M. S. (1984). Designing New business startups: entrepreneurial, organizational and econolgical considerations. Journal of management, 87-107.eng
dcterms.referencesVeciana, J. M. (1988). Empresari I process de creacio d´empreses. Revista Económica de Catalunya, 53-67.eng
dcterms.referencesVesper, K. H. (1979). New ventures Strategies. New Jersey: Prentice-hall.eng
dcterms.referencesVesper, K. H. (1990). New Venture Strategies: Entrepreneurship and growth. International Small Business Journal, 31(1), 3-22.eng
dcterms.referencesWennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small business economics, 13(1), 27-55.eng
dcterms.referencesWoolley, J. (2010). Technology emergence through entrepreneurship across multiple industries. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1-21.eng
dcterms.referencesYanez, M., Khalil, T.M., Walsh, S.T. (2010). IAMOT and education: defining a technology and innovation management _(TIM) body-of-Knowledge (BoK) for graduate eduaction (Tim BoK). Technoinnovation, 389-400.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
sb.programaDoctorado en Gestión de la Tecnología y la Innovaciónspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF_RESUMEN.pdf
Tamaño:
406.62 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
4.97 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones