Rio Pamplonita un sujeto de derecho ambiental
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2025
Autores
Vasquez Ruiz, Leydi Lorena
Rochel Garay, Yeicica Paola
Acero Ramírez, Neyra Yasbleidy
Carvajalino Suarez, Yenny Carolina
García Ruiz, Alvaro Ismar
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El estudio tuvo como fin analizar el deterioro socioambiental e histórico del río Pamplonita y fundamentar la necesidad de reconocerlo como sujeto de derechos. El objetivo general se centró en examinar las afectaciones ambientales y normativas que inciden en su degradación, articulado con un enfoque cualitativo, sociojurídico e interpretativo que integró análisis de contenido, triangulación de fuentes y el método sociojurídico de De Sousa Santos. Los resultados muestran un deterioro progresivo asociado a urbanización, contaminación, minería, variabilidad climática y los impactos del conflicto armado, que han convertido al río en víctima ecológica y al territorio en un escenario de desigualdad ambiental. En el plano jurídico, se identificó que la Sentencia T-622 de 2016, junto con fallos sobre la Amazonía y precedentes internacionales, constituyen la base para sustentar su eventual reconocimiento como sujeto de derechos. Asimismo, las narrativas comunitarias evidencian el profundo valor cultural, espiritual y territorial que las comunidades ribereñas atribuyen al río, reforzando la urgencia de una protección biocultural. En conclusión, el estudio demuestra que el Pamplonita enfrenta afectaciones estructurales, que existe sustento normativo y jurisprudencial sólido para reconocerlo como sujeto de derechos y que su protección requiere integrar justicia socioecológica, memoria territorial y una gobernanza ecológica transformadora
The study aimed to analyze the socio-environmental and historical deterioration of the Pamplonita River and to substantiate the need to recognize it as a subject of rights. The overall objective focused on examining the environmental and regulatory factors that contribute to its degradation, using a qualitative, socio-legal, and interpretive approach that integrated content analysis, triangulation of sources, and De Sousa Santos' socio-legal method. The results show progressive deterioration associated with urbanization, pollution, mining, climate variability, and the impacts of armed conflict, which have turned the river into an ecological victim and the territory into a scene of environmental inequality. On the legal level, it was identified that Ruling T-622 of 2016, together with rulings on the Amazon and international precedents, constitute the basis for supporting its eventual recognition as a subject of rights. Likewise, community narratives demonstrate the profound cultural, spiritual, and territorial value that riverside communities attribute to the river, reinforcing the urgency of biocultural protection. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the Pamplonita faces structural impacts, that there is solid regulatory and jurisprudential support for recognizing it as a subject of rights, and that its protection requires the integration of socio-ecological justice, territorial memory, and transformative ecological governance.
The study aimed to analyze the socio-environmental and historical deterioration of the Pamplonita River and to substantiate the need to recognize it as a subject of rights. The overall objective focused on examining the environmental and regulatory factors that contribute to its degradation, using a qualitative, socio-legal, and interpretive approach that integrated content analysis, triangulation of sources, and De Sousa Santos' socio-legal method. The results show progressive deterioration associated with urbanization, pollution, mining, climate variability, and the impacts of armed conflict, which have turned the river into an ecological victim and the territory into a scene of environmental inequality. On the legal level, it was identified that Ruling T-622 of 2016, together with rulings on the Amazon and international precedents, constitute the basis for supporting its eventual recognition as a subject of rights. Likewise, community narratives demonstrate the profound cultural, spiritual, and territorial value that riverside communities attribute to the river, reinforcing the urgency of biocultural protection. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the Pamplonita faces structural impacts, that there is solid regulatory and jurisprudential support for recognizing it as a subject of rights, and that its protection requires the integration of socio-ecological justice, territorial memory, and transformative ecological governance.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Río Pamplonita, Sujeto de derecho, Memoria ambiental, Gobernanza biocultural, Justicia socio ecológica
