Vulneración del derecho a la defensa en la imputación prevista por la Ley 906 de 2004
Cargando...
Fecha
2024
Autores
Muñoz Ariza, Juan José
Machado Colon, Carlos Julio
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El propósito de este estudio, es valorar el impacto del acto de formulación de imputación establecido en la ley 906 de 2004, relacionado con el derecho a la defensa del procesado, de conformidad con los estándares internacionales en materia de las garantías y de la protección judicial, que se deriva de la investigación. Metodológicamente, se trata de una investigación que aplica el paradigma hermenéutico, el enfoque cualitativo y la tradición de la investigación jurídica. Las técnicas de recolección de la información empleadas son: la observación documental y el análisis de contenido. Se concluye que la ley 600 del 2000, pese a no ser tan garantista como la ley 906/2004, ofrece de manera ininterrumpida, integral, técnica y material, el derecho al contradictorio, como ejercicio singularizado del derecho a la defensa. Para tal cometido, se analiza las consecuencias de la vulneración a la garantía no prevista en el acto de la formulación de cargos, y las desventajas que, desde el punto de vista procesal por seguridad jurídica, le ocasiona al imputado.
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the act of formulation of accusation established in Law 906 of 2004, on the right to defense of the accused in accordance with international standards on judicial guarantees and scientific judicial protection. derives from the research called. Methodologically, it is a research that applies the hermeneutic paradigm, the qualitative approach and the tradition of legal research. The information collection techniques used are: documental observation and content analysis. It is concluded that Law 600 of 2000, despite not being as guaranteeing as Law 904/2004, offers in an uninterrupted, comprehensive, technical, and material manner, the right to adversary, as a singular exercise of the right to defense. For this purpose, the consequences of the violation of the guarantee not provided for in the act of formulating charges are analyzed, and the disadvantages that, from the procedural point of view due to legal certainty, it causes to the accused.
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the act of formulation of accusation established in Law 906 of 2004, on the right to defense of the accused in accordance with international standards on judicial guarantees and scientific judicial protection. derives from the research called. Methodologically, it is a research that applies the hermeneutic paradigm, the qualitative approach and the tradition of legal research. The information collection techniques used are: documental observation and content analysis. It is concluded that Law 600 of 2000, despite not being as guaranteeing as Law 904/2004, offers in an uninterrupted, comprehensive, technical, and material manner, the right to adversary, as a singular exercise of the right to defense. For this purpose, the consequences of the violation of the guarantee not provided for in the act of formulating charges are analyzed, and the disadvantages that, from the procedural point of view due to legal certainty, it causes to the accused.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Defensa, Derechos humanos, Igualdad de armas, Imputación, Progresividad