Logotipo del repositorio
Logotipo del repositorio
 

Efecto del ecosistema de emprendimiento en el crecimiento de emprendimientos de base tecnológica. Un análisis desde la capacidad de absorción

Vista sencilla de ítem
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Ospino, Luis Eduardo
dc.contributor.advisorAmar Sepúlveda, Paola
dc.contributor.authorLara Rodríguez, Yarelis Esther
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T14:43:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T14:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractEn la presente investigación se analizó cómo el ecosistema de emprendimiento influye en el crecimiento de los emprendimientos de base tecnológica (EBT) en territorios con distintos niveles de capacidad de absorción. Se parte de la premisa de que un ecosistema robusto, con acceso a financiamiento, redes de conocimiento, mentores, capital humano especializado y políticas públicas favorables, puede impulsar el desempeño de las EBT, siempre y cuando las empresas o la región posean la habilidad necesaria para asimilar y aprovechar dichos recursos. Para probar esta hipótesis, se realizaron estudios comparativos en dos territorios colombianos: Barranquilla, con una infraestructura y redes más consolidadas, y Valledupar, caracterizada por limitaciones en articulación institucional y recursos. Desde una perspectiva teórica, el trabajo se apoyó en la teoría basada en recursos y en la literatura sobre ecosistemas de emprendimiento, que destacan la importancia de factores como el financiamiento, la cultura de apoyo al emprendedor y la capacidad de absorción (organizacional y territorial). Se recopilaron datos primarios y secundarios acerca de indicadores de crecimiento (ventas, empleos y alianzas estratégicas), así como variables ecosistémicas (infraestructura, financiamiento, políticas de fomento) y de capacidad de absorción. A través de análisis estadísticos, se comprobó que la relación entre el ecosistema y el crecimiento de las EBT no es lineal, sino que depende de la solidez del entorno y de la habilidad para interiorizar el conocimiento externo. En Barranquilla, donde la capacidad de absorción y la densidad ecosistémica son mayores, la influencia positiva del ecosistema se hizo evidente, reflejándose en un aumento significativo de las ventas de las EBT. Sin embargo, en Valledupar, la debilidad del entorno y la baja articulación entre actores limitaron el efecto colectivo, de modo que las empresas no lograron traducir los recursos disponibles en crecimiento medible. Como conclusión, la investigación confirma que el ecosistema emprendedor sí ejerce un efecto significativo sobre el crecimiento de las EBT, pero este resultado se manifiesta únicamente cuando coexisten recursos suficientes y una capacidad de absorción adecuada que permita incorporar el conocimiento y capitalizar oportunidades. De esta forma, si bien la hipótesis general se valida en el caso de Barranquilla, se rechaza en Valledupar, evidenciando la necesidad de fortalecer tanto las condiciones básicas del ecosistema como la capacidad de absorción del territorio en las regiones emergentes. Estos hallazgos ofrecen implicaciones prácticas para el diseño de políticas públicas y estrategias de apoyo, resaltando la importancia de invertir no solo en la disponibilidad de recursos, sino también en la formación de habilidades y redes que posibiliten su aprovechamiento integralspa
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes how the entrepreneurial ecosystem influences the growth of technology-based ventures (TBVs) in regions with varying levels of absorption capacity. It is based on the premise that a robust ecosystem—with access to financing, knowledge networks, mentors, specialized human capital, and favorable public policies—can enhance TBVs’ performance, provided that firms or the region possess the ability to assimilate and leverage these resources. To test this hypothesis, a comparative study was conducted in two Colombian territories: Barranquilla, characterized by more consolidated infrastructure and networks, and Valledupar, marked by institutional fragmentation and limited resources. The research draws on resource-based theory and entrepreneurial ecosystem literature, highlighting the role of financing, entrepreneurial culture, and absorption capacity (both organizational and territorial). Primary and secondary data on growth indicators (sales, employment, strategic alliances) and ecosystem variables (infrastructure, financing, policy support) were collected. Statistical analysis revealed that the relationship between the ecosystem and TBV growth is not linear but depends on the strength of the environment and the ability to internalize external knowledge. In Barranquilla, where absorption capacity and ecosystem density are higher, a significant positive impact on TBV sales was observed. Conversely, Valledupar’s weaker environment and low actor coordination hindered the translation of available resources into measurable growth. The findings confirm that entrepreneurial ecosystems significantly affect TBV growth only when sufficient resources coexist with adequate absorption capacity, allowing knowledge incorporation and opportunity capitalization. While the hypothesis was validated for Barranquilla, it was rejected for Valledupar, underscoring the need to strengthen both ecosystem conditions and absorption capacity in emerging regions. These results have practical implications for policy design and support strategies, emphasizing investment not only in resource availability but also in skill development and network formation to enable comprehensive resource utilization.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/17002
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingenieeríasspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationaleng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectEcosistema de emprendimientospa
dc.subjectCrecimiento empresarialspa
dc.subjectCrecimiento empresarialspa
dc.subjectCapacidad de absorciónspa
dc.subjectRedes de conocimientospa
dc.subject.keywordsEntrepreneurial ecosystemeng
dc.subject.keywordsTechnology-based ventures (TBVs)eng
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness growtheng
dc.subject.keywordsAbsorptive capacityeng
dc.subject.keywordsKnowledge networkseng
dc.titleEfecto del ecosistema de emprendimiento en el crecimiento de emprendimientos de base tecnológica. Un análisis desde la capacidad de absorciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.spaTesis de doctorado
dcterms.referencesAcs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016eng
dcterms.referencesAcs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9eng
dcterms.referencesAcs, Z. J., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High-Impact Firms: Gazelles Revisited. Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration. https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2012/07/rs328tot.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesAguilar-Olaves, G., Herrera, L., & Clemenza, C. (2014). Capacidad de absorción: Aproximaciones teóricas y empíricas para el sector servicios. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 19(67), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.37960/revista.v19i67.7440spa
dcterms.referencesAlmus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008138709724eng
dcterms.referencesÁlvarez, R., & Grazzi, M. (2018). Innovation and entrepreneurship in Latin America: What do we know? What would we like to know? Estudios de Economía, 45(2), 157– 171. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52862018000200157eng
dcterms.referencesAlvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887– 903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694eng
dcterms.referencesAmar-Sepúlveda, P., Ortiz-Ospino, L., Álvarez-Martínez, R., & González-Sarmiento, E. (2023). Mapeo de actores de innovación con baja capacidad de absorción: Estudio de caso en San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina. Desarrollo Gerencial, 15(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.15.1.6257spa
dcterms.referencesAndrews, R. J., Fazio, C., Guzman, J., Liu, Y., & Stern, S. (2022). The Startup Cartography Project: Measuring and mapping entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104437eng
dcterms.referencesAnzola-Román, M. T., & Farías-Farías, J. F. (2010). Emprendimiento y desarrollo: Una aproximación teórica. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 15(52), 588–603spa
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Cherkas, N. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: The role of institutions. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0247609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247609eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth Regimes over Time and Space. Regional Studies, 36(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121909eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9600-6eng
dcterms.referencesAudretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The Theory of Knowledge Spillover Entrepreneurship*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.xeng
dcterms.referencesAutio, E. (1997). New, technology-based firms in innovation networks: Symplectic and generative impacts. Research Policy, 26(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048- 7333(96)00906-7eng
dcterms.referencesAutio, E. (2005). Creative tension: The significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s article ‘Toward a Theory of International New Ventures’. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400117eng
dcterms.referencesAutio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266eng
dcterms.referencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108eng
dcterms.referencesBlanco, A. (2024a). Latin America’s Flourishing Tech Enterprise Ecosystem and Startups: Current Situation and Challenges.eng
dcterms.referencesBlanco, A. (2024b, julio 23). Latin America’s flourishing tech enterprise ecosystem and startups: Current situation and challenges [Latin America’s flourishing tech enterprise ecosystem and startups: current situation and challenges]. Elcano Royal Institute. https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/latin-americas-flourishing-tech-enterpriseecosystem-and-startups-current-situation-and-challenges/eng
dcterms.referencesBrown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34(12), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.002eng
dcterms.referencesBuarque, B., Câmara, S., Fischer, B., & Magalhães, R. (2022). Performance of spin-offs and brazilian startups: A study on technological evolution based on entrepreneurship and networks. Regepe - Revista De Empreendedorismo E Gestão De Pequenas Empresas. https://doi.org/10.14211/ibjesb.e2103eng
dcterms.referencesCalispa, E., Calispa Aguilar, M., Serrano Aguiar, C., Pozo Safla, E., Moreno Barriga, M., García Cabezas, E., & Cayán Martínez, J. (2023). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in South American Most Prosperous Countries: National and Regional Level Perspectives. Economies, 11(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11030084eng
dcterms.referencesCamacho, J. A., Azagra, J. M., & Alonso, I. (1999). Creación de empresas de base tecnológica en España. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de economía, 782, 161–176spa
dcterms.referencesCámara de Comercio de Valledupar. (2024). Reporte de Coyuntura Económica del Cesar—IV Trimestre 2023 y Perspectivas 2024. Cámara de Comercio de Valledupar, Departamento de Estudios Económicos. https://ccvalledupar.org.co/wpcontent/uploads/2024/03/Reporte-de-Coyuntura-Economica-del-Cesar-IV-Trimestre2023-y-Perspectivas-2024-1.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesCantillon, R. (1959). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général (H. Higgs, Ed.). Frank Cass and Co.ptg
dcterms.referencesCao, X., & Shi, X. (2021). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-yeng
dcterms.referencesCaragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge spillovers: The Cohen and Levinthal model revisited. Applied Economics, 44(11), 1363–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.539549eng
dcterms.referencesCarayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0eng
dcterms.referencesCarrasco, I., & Castaño, M. S. (2008). El emprendedor schumpeteriano y el contexto social.spa
dcterms.referencesInformación Comercial Española: ICE, Revista de Economía, 845, 121–134spa
dcterms.referencesCastellacci, F., & Natera, J. (2015). Innovation, Absorptive Capacity and Growth Heterogeneity: Development Paths in Latin America 1970–2010 (Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20150820). Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tik:inowpp:20150820eng
dcterms.referencesCastellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2016). Innovation, absorptive capacity and growth heterogeneity: Development paths in Latin America 1970–2010. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 37, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2016.01.003eng
dcterms.referencesCastillo-Molina, Y. Y., & Gómez-Villamarín, C. A. (2021). Effects of Technological Cooperation on the Innovative Activity of the Colombian Manufacturing Industry. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 30(54). https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v30.n54.2021.13264eng
dcterms.referencesCavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2019a). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1291–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3eng
dcterms.referencesCavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2019b). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and the Role of Institutions in Developing Entrepreneurial Innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149(119762). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762eng
dcterms.referencesCharão, A. M., & Matos, F. R. N. (2017). Capacidad de absorción e innovación en empresas familiares: Un estudio sobre la influencia de la diversidad generacional. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 18(5), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678- 69712017/administracao.v18n5p14-39spa
dcterms.referencesCherukara, J. J., & Manalel, J. (2011). Evolution of Entrepreneurship Theories through Different Schools of Thought. The Ninth Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship, Ahmedabad, India. https://www.ediindia.org/old_website/images/pdf/james-josephcherukara.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.eng
dcterms.referencesChristensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Presseng
dcterms.referencesChurchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The Five Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.eng
dcterms.referencesClarysse, B., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship theory from an interventionist perspectiveeng
dcterms.referencesThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010- 9173-2eng
dcterms.referencesCMD Innovation Labs. (2023). Ecosistemas de innovación y emprendimiento en América Latina y El Caribe. Grupo Ciencia + Diálogo. https://www.grupocmd.com/singlepost/ecosistemas_innovacion_alcspa
dcterms.referencesCohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, S., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, S. L. (2013). What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels.eng
dcterms.referencesInnovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00184eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, S. L., Hochberg, Y. V., & Feld, B. (2021). Digitization and the absorptive capacity of startups. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1713–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187- 020-00409-weng
dcterms.referencesCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553eng
dcterms.referencesColombelli, A., Paolucci, E., & Ughetto, E. (2019). Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4eng
dcterms.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad. (2024). Informe Nacional de Competitividad 2023‑2024. Consejo Privado de Competitividadspa
dcterms.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad & Universidad del Rosario. Centro de Estudios para la Competitividad Regional (CEPEC). (2023). Índice Departamental de Competitividad 2023: Desafíos para la transformación productiva y social. Consejo Privado de Competitividad; Universidad del Rosario. https://urosario.edu.co/sites/default/files/2023- 05/IDC-2023-versi%C3%B3n-final.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad & Universidad del Rosario. Centro de Estudios para la Competitividad Regional (CEPEC). (2024). Índice Departamental de Competitividad 2024: Prospectiva para la transformación productiva y social. Consejo Privado de Competitividad; Universidad del Rosario. https://www.ccc.org.co/inc/uploads/2024/08/IDC-2024.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesContreras, F., Aldeanueva, I., Espinosa, J., & Abid, G. (2021). Potential and realized absorptive capacity in colombian firms: The mediating role of the organizational climate for innovation. Sage Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211052549eng
dcterms.referencesCoviello, N. (2015). Re-thinking research on born globals. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.28eng
dcterms.referencesCruz, C. V., Cruz, L. E. E., Godoy, I. I. V., Zambrano, S. L. M., Aguilar, J. Á. F., & Pérez, O. A.spa
dcterms.referencesP. (2023). Diagnóstico Del Ecosistema De Emprendimiento: Estado Y Componentes Del Centro Universitario Regional Del Litoral Atlántico, Honduras. Economía Y Administración (E&A), 14(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.5377/eya.v14i1.16736spa
dcterms.referencesDaunfeldt, S.-O., & Elert, N. (2013). When is Gibrat’s law a law? Small Business Economics, 41(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9404-xeng
dcterms.referencesDelapierre, M., Madeuf, B., & Savoy, A. (1998). NTBFs—The French case. Research Policy, 26(9), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00055-3eng
dcterms.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). (2023). Estrategia de Rendición de Cuentas Vigencia 2022—2023. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística.spa
dcterms.referenceshttps://www.dane.gov.co/files/control_participacion/rendicion_cuentas/2022/Documento_e strategia_rendici%C3%B3n_cuentas.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesDrucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper & Roweng
dcterms.referencesDubini, P. (1989). The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(89)90031-1eng
dcterms.referencesDuchek, S. (2015). Enhancing absorptive capacity for innovation and change: The role of structural determinants. Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.988637eng
dcterms.referencesEndres, H., Huesig, S., & Pesch, R. (2022). Digital innovation management for entrepreneurial ecosystems: Services and functionalities as drivers of innovation management software adoption. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00441-4eng
dcterms.referencesEngel, J. S. (2015). Global Clusters of Innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 57(2), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36eng
dcterms.referencesEngelen, A., Kube, H., Schmidt, S., & Flatten, T. C. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(8), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.002eng
dcterms.referencesEscribano, Á., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022eng
dcterms.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4eng
dcterms.referencesEurostat & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). EurostatOECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-010- EN.PDFeng
dcterms.referencesFariñas, J. C., & López, A. (2006). Firms’ productivity and the international market. Economics Letters, 90(3), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.08.023eng
dcterms.referencesFernandes, A. J., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: A literature review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 189–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00437-6eng
dcterms.referencesFernández, Q., Miriam, G., Nina, A., Dante, V., & De La Cruz Fernández, G. M. (2017). Iniciativa del emprendimiento en los entornos rurales: Un estudio de los factores culturales. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 22(77), 191. https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v22i78.22874spa
dcterms.referencesFlechas Chaparro, M., Kozesinski, S., & Camargo, M. (2021). Knowledge acquisition and absorptive capacity in the creation of SMEs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovationeng
dcterms.references/ Revista de Emprendimiento e Innovación, 5(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.38035/rei.v5.i1.167spa
dcterms.referencesFlechas Chaparro, X., Kozesinski, E., & Camargo, M. (2021). A multi-stakeholder perspective on entrepreneurial university in Colombia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.7341/20211712eng
dcterms.referencesFormichella, M. M. (2004). El concepto del emprendimiento y su relación con la educación, el empleo y el desarrollo local. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Hilario Ascasubi. https://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta_-el_concepto_de_emprendimiento.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesFotopoulos, G. (2022). The geography of high-growth firms: Recent evidence and future research agenda. Regional Studies, 56(6), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1990215eng
dcterms.referencesFu, W., & Qian, H. (2023). Building innovative capacity in regional entrepreneurship and innovation (eco)systems: Startups versus incumbent firms. Growth and Change, 54(3), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12673eng
dcterms.referencesGallegos, J., & Miralles, F. (2021). El impacto de redes de colaboración en la innovación tecnológica en empresas. Retos, 11(22), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n22.2021.08spa
dcterms.referencesGámez Gutiérrez, J., & Garzón Baquero, M. F. (2017). Nuevos negocios de base tecnológica (NBTS) en economías emergentes: Retos que enfrenta el emprendedor. Tecnología y Desarrollo, 15(1), 81–98spa
dcterms.referencesGarcía Yerpes, M. M., & García Londoño, Á. A. (2010). Hacia un modelo integral de capacidad de absorción en empresas colombianas: Una revisión teórica y propuesta de agenda de investigación. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad del Valle), 23(40), 221–244spa
dcterms.referencesGarzón Castrillón, G. A. (2016). Capacidad de absorción y dinámica competitiva en pymes intensivas en conocimiento. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época, 2, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.17561/ree.v2016.n2.4spa
dcterms.referencesGenome, S. (2019). The global startup ecosystem report 2019. Startup Genome, San Francisco. Genome, S. (2020). The global startup ecosystem report GSER 2020. Startup Genome, San Franciscoeng
dcterms.referencesGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021/2022 National Report: Colombia. GEM Colombia (Universidad Icesi, Universidad del Norte, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Universidad EAN, Universidad de los Andes). https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20212022-report-colombiaeng
dcterms.referencesGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 Global Report: Adapting to a “New Normal”. GEM Consortium. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20222023-global-reporteng
dcterms.referencesGnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403eng
dcterms.referencesGobernación del Atlántico. (2024). Plan de Desarrollo Departamental (Átlantico Para El Mundo) [Plan de Desarrollo]. Gobernación del Atlántico. https://www.atlantico.gov.co/index.php/listado-general-de-planes/85- plandesarrollo/23795-plan-de-desarrollo-2023-2027spa
dcterms.referencesGreiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37–46eng
dcterms.referencesGrupo Banco Mundial. (2024). Colombia: Panorama general. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/country/colombia/overviewspa
dcterms.referencesGuisao Paniagua, S., Rincón García, L. D., & Arias-Pérez, J. (2017). Capacidad de tecnologías de información y desempeño organizacional: Efecto mediador de la capacidad de absorción. Cuadernos de Administración, 30(55), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao30-55.ctidospa
dcterms.referencesGuo, Z. (2024). The Impact of Venture Capital on the Survival Rate of Startups: An Empirical Analysis Based on Industry Data. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 17(2), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.54097/vrjxjs22eng
dcterms.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., & Fernández Collado, C. (2008). Metodología de la investigación: Diseño y fundamento de la investigación (6, Ed.). McGraw-Hill Interamericana.spa
dcterms.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesMetodología de la investigación (6, Ed.). McGraw-Hill Educationspa
dcterms.referencesHosmer, D. W., Jr., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression (3, Ed.). John Wiley & Sonseng
dcterms.referencesHwang, V. W., & Horowitt, G. (2012). The Rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley. Regenwald.eng
dcterms.referencesIsaksen, A. (2001). Building Regional Innovation Systems: Is Endogenous Industrial Development Possible in the Global Economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science / Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, 24(1), 101–120eng
dcterms.referencesIsenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50eng
dcterms.referencesIsenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson College, The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. https://www.urenio.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economicgrowth.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesIsenberg, D., & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scaleup Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth (Innovations Case Narrative: Manizales-Mas and Scale Up Milwaukee).eng
dcterms.referencesInnovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 11(1–2), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00248eng
dcterms.referencesJacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems.eng
dcterms.referencesStrategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904 Kantis, H., & Federico, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Latin America: Key policyeng
dcterms.referencesissues. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2018-0109eng
dcterms.referencesKantis, H., Federico, J., Ibarra García, S., & Menéndez, C. (2016). Índice de Condiciones Sistémicas para el Emprendimiento Dinámico (ICSED). Una herramienta de diagnóstico y benchmarking para los hacedores de política de América Latina. Programa de Desarrollo Emprendedor (PRODEM), Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. https://www.prodem.ungs.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ICSED-PRODEM-2016- web.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesKirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflineng
dcterms.referencesKPMG Colombia. (2023). Mapeo del Ecosistema Colombiano 2022-2023. KPMG. https://kpmg.com/co/es/home/insights/2023/05/mapeo-del-ecosistema-colombiano-2022- 2023.htmlspa
dcterms.referencesKuratko, D. F., Fisher, G., & Audretsch, D. B. (2021). Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset.eng
dcterms.referencesSmall Business Economics, 57(4), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187- 020-00372-6eng
dcterms.referencesLane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833– 863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456eng
dcterms.referencesLaw, J. (2019, mayo 16). Beijing, Shanghai Named in World’s Top Ten Startup Ecosystems [Beijing, Shanghai Named in World’s Top Ten Startup Ecosystems]. Radii. https://radii.co/article/beijing-shanghai-named-in-worlds-top-ten-startup-ecosystemseng
dcterms.referencesLehmann, E. E., Seitz, N., & Starnecker, A. (2022). Fostering entrepreneurship ecosystems: An analysis of university spillovers in non-metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 56(6), 961– 978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1980685eng
dcterms.referencesLeiva, J., Mora-Esquivel, R., & Hernández-Ramírez, M. (2022). La orientación emprendedora para la innovación en las pymes: Importante pero no suficiente. Emprendimiento Y Negocios Internacionales, 7.1 (2022), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.20420/eni.2022.542spa
dcterms.referencesLicht, G., & Nerlinger, E. (1998). New technology-based firms in Germany: A survey of the recent evidence. Research Policy, 26(9), 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048- 7333(97)00056-5eng
dcterms.referencesLotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2003). Does Gibrat’s law hold among young, small firms? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-003-0150-9eng
dcterms.referencesLutz, A. (2003). Nuevos paradigmas y nuevas oportunidades: Nichos de mercado para emprendedores tecnológicos. Experiencias prácticas en la Unión Europea. En K. Simón (Ed.), La creación de empresas de base tecnológica: Una experiencia práctica (pp. 43– 50). Asociación Española de Centros Europeos de Innovación Españoles.spa
dcterms.referencesMack, E. A., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystemseng
dcterms.referencesUrban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547 Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass,12(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12355eng
dcterms.referencesMarulanda Valencia, F. Á., & Morales Gualdrón, S. T. (2016). Entorno y motivaciones para emprender. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 81, 12– 28. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n81.2016.1556spa
dcterms.referencesMason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesMihajlović, I., Crnjac Milić, D., & Mašek Tonković, A. (2022). Innovations and highgrowth firms: A systematic literature review. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 17(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0014eng
dcterms.referencesMihajlović, I., Mašek Tonković, A., & Dabić, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial activity in digitally transforming cities. Cities, 124(103610). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103610eng
dcterms.referencesMilanesi, G. (2021). Financing high-growth firms: A systematic literature review. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019- 00291-yeng
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia (MinTic), World Bank Group, & Endeavor Colombia. (2016a). Accelerating Digital Entrepreneurship in Colombia. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/677171475399004306/pdf/108795-WPPUBLIC-WBReDLibColombiaAcceleratingDigitalEntrepreneurship.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia (MinTic), World Bank Group, & Endeavor Colombia. (2016b). Ecosistema de emprendimiento e innovación en Colombia: Un análisis integral y recomendaciones de política. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia; World Bank Group; Endeavor Colombia. https://colombiadigital.com/actualidad/articulos- informativos/item/9256-mintic-bancomundial-y-endeavor-presentan-radiografia-del- emprendimiento-digital-en-colombia.htmlspa
dcterms.referencesMolina Sánchez, R., López Salazar, A., & Contreras Soto, R. (2014). El emprendimiento y crecimiento de las Pymes. Acta Universitaria, 24(NE-1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2014.701spa
dcterms.referencesMontgomery, D. C., Hubele, N. F., & Runger, G. C. (2009). Engineering Statistics (4, Ed.).Wileyeng
dcterms.referencesMoore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.eng
dcterms.referencesMora, D. (2024). La Influencia de las Startups en la Innovación Empresarial de México durante el periodo 2017-2022. CaleidoscoPI, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29057/caleidoscopi.v1i2.11701eng
dcterms.referencesMotohashi, K. (2005). University–Industry Collaborations in Japan: The Role of New Technology-Based Firms in Transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.001eng
dcterms.referencesNachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013eng
dcterms.referencesNambisan, S., Zahra, S. A., & Luo, Y. (2019). Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1464– 1486. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4eng
dcterms.referencesNicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2021). The role of human capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Evidence from Italy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00618-8eng
dcterms.referencesNiosi, J., & Bellon, B. (2002). The absorptive capacity of Canadian enterprises in biotechnology.eng
dcterms.referencesInternational Journal of Biotechnology, 4(2/3), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBT.2002.001140eng
dcterms.referencesNúñez-Álvarez, C., & Leiva, J. C. (2020). Evaluación Integral Del Ecosistema Emprendedor De Costa Rica Y Propuestas Para Su Mejora. Revista Mexicana De Economía Y Finanzas, 15(SNEA), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v15i0.544spa
dcterms.referencesObservatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología (OCyT). (2021). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC) 2021: Metodología y Resultados. Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología; Departamento Nacional de Planeación. https://ocyt.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/IDIC-2021-Metodologia-yResultados.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). OECD Reviews of Digital Transformation: Going Digital in Colombia. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/00632974-eneng
dcterms.referencesPalmié, M., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Caglar, U. (2020). The evolution of the FinTech ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in the financial services industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151(119779). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779eng
dcterms.referencesPavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.eng
dcterms.referencesResearch Policy, 13(6), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Beng
dcterms.referencesPro Mujer. (2022). The state of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Latin America: Building inclusion and dynamism. https://promujer.org/news/the-state-of-theentrepreneurial- ecosystem-in-latin-america-building-inclusion-and-dynamism/eng
dcterms.referencesPrograma Collision EBT. (2025, abril 1). Collision EBT. Creamos empresas con propósito a través de la tecnología y la innovación. https://programacollisionebt.com/spa
dcterms.referencesPrograma VERSOS EBT. (2025, abril 1). VERSOS EBT. Un espacio para que tú seas el intérprete de la tecnología. https://versosebt.com/spa
dcterms.referencesQian, H. (2018). Knowledge-Based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242418760981eng
dcterms.referencesQian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2023). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Economic Development Policyeng
dcterms.referencesEconomic Development Quarterly, 37(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221142853eng
dcterms.referencesQian, H., Acs, Z. J., & Stough, R. R. (2013). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: The nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs009eng
dcterms.referencesRamos, J. (2024). Factores determinantes en el surgimiento y creación de emprendimientos tecnológicos en ciudades intermedias como Valledupar en el departamento del Cesar, Colombia [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dcterms.referencesReuber, A. R., Tippmann, E., & Monaghan, S. (2021). Global Scaling as a Logic of Multinationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00417-2eng
dcterms.referencesRitala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013). Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition—The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5885.2012.00956.xeng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez, G., & García, H. (2017). Cultura, innovación y competitividad en regiones emergentes: El caso del Valle del Cauca (Colombia). Cuadernos de Administraciónspa
dcterms.references(Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), 30(55), 69 97. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao30-55.cicerspa
dcterms.referencesRodríguez, N., Armenteras, D., & Retana, J. (2015). National Ecosystems Services Priorities for Planning Carbon and Water Resource Management in Colombia. Land Use Policy, 42, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.013eng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez Romero, C., & Jiménez, M. F. (2005). Emprenderismo, acción gubernamental y academia: Revisión de la literatura. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 15(26), 73–85.spa
dcterms.referencesRomer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz Cedeño, S. D. M., & Palacios Dueñas, A. E. (2020). El emprendimiento en América Latina: Un análisis de su etimología, tipología y proceso. ECA Sinergia, 11(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.33936/eca_sinergia.v11i2.2115spa
dcterms.referencesRuiz Olabuénaga, J. I. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa (5, Ed.). Universidad de Deusto.spa
dcterms.referencesSánchez‑García, E., Marco‑Lajara, B., & Martínez‑Falcó, J. (2023). La orientación emprendedora como fuente de innovación para las empresas. Un análisis aplicado. Brazilian Journal of Development, 9(05), 16595–16626. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n5-141spa
dcterms.referencesSancho-Zamora, R., del Val Segarra-Oña, M., & Peiró-Signes, Á. (2022). A multidimensional study of absorptive capacity and innovation capacity and their impact on businesseng
dcterms.referencesperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(834452). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834452eng
dcterms.referencesSantisteban, J., De la Hoz, M. A., & Salcedo, S. (2021). Critical Success Factors for Technology- Based Startups in Accelerators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171(120967). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120967eng
dcterms.referencesSantisteban, J., & Mauricio, D. (2017a). Critical success factors for technologybased startups.eng
dcterms.referencesJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 923–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2017-0224eng
dcterms.referencesSantisteban, J., & Mauricio, D. (2017b). Factores críticos de éxito en el emprendimiento tecnológico. 44–56spa
dcterms.referencesSay, J.-B. (1803). Traité d’économie politique, ou simple exposition de la manière dont se forment, se distribuent et se consomment les richesses. Deterville. https://classiques.uqam.ca/classiques/say_jean_baptiste/traite_eco_pol/traite_eco_pol.ht mptg
dcterms.referencesSchildt, H. A., Keil, T., & Maula, M. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firmlevel absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1961eng
dcterms.referencesSchillaci, C. E., Romano, M., & Nicotra, M. (2013). Territory’s absorptive capacity: A knowledge-based approach to territorial development. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1978–1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722968eng
dcterms.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesSevilla-Bernardo, D., Pérez-Paulet, C., & Fernández-Gámez, M. (2022). Success Factors of Startups in Research Literature within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 34(3–4), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2036147eng
dcterms.referencesShane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.eng
dcterms.referencesAcademy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611eng
dcterms.referencesSiaw, C. A., & Sarpong, D. (2021). Dynamic exchange capabilities for value cocreation in ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 134, 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.060eng
dcterms.referencesSimal, B., Villavicencio, Á., & Rodríguez, F. (2017). Resiliencia organizacional: Ideas para el debate en el contexto ecuatoriano. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 13, 1– 10.spa
dcterms.referencesSkawińska, E., & Zalewski, R. I. (2020). Success Factors of Startups in the EU— A Comparative Study. Sustainability, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135389eng
dcterms.referencesSparano, H. (2014). Emprendimiento en América Latina y su impacto en la gestión de proyectos.spa
dcterms.referencesRevista Dimensión Empresarial, 12(2), 95–106spa
dcterms.referencesSpiegel, M., & Marxt, C. (2011). Defining Technology Entrepreneurship. 1623– 1627. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2011.6118195eng
dcterms.referencesSpigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167eng
dcterms.referencesSpilling, O. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148- 2963(95)00166-8eng
dcterms.referencesStam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique.eng
dcterms.referencesEuropean Planning Studies, 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (Working Papers Nos. 16– 13)eng
dcterms.referencesUtrecht School of Economics. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:use:tkiwps:1613 Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2018). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. En R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, & Jeng
dcterms.referencesHeinonen, The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 407–421). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984080.n21eng
dcterms.referencesStam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6eng
dcterms.referencesStorey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26(9), 1037–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00058-9eng
dcterms.referencesSutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration. MIT Press.eng
dcterms.referencesTansley, A. G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070eng
dcterms.referencesTerán-Yépez, E., & Guerrero-Mora, M. (2020). La Evolución del Concepto de Emprendedor en la Teoría Económica. Revista de Economía Mundial, 56, 271–288. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i56.4802spa
dcterms.referencesThornton, P. H. (1999). The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.19eng
dcterms.referencesTimmons, J. A. (1985). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1980s. Richard D. Irwin.eng
dcterms.referencesTuta Anzola, D. C., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2014). Emprendimiento y ecosistemas de innovación: Propuesta de un modelo de doce hélices. Cuadernos de Administración (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), 27(48), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao27-48.eeipspa
dcterms.referencesUniversidad de los Andes. Facultad de Administración. (2023a). Informe de innovación y emprendimiento en Colombia. Universidad de los Andes.spa
dcterms.referencesUniversidad de los Andes. Facultad de Administración. (2023b). Reporte de Innovación Empresarial: Gestores de Innovación en Colombia.spa
dcterms.referencesValentim, L. M., Lisboa, J. V., & Franco, M. (2016). Capacidades dinámicas e innovación en las organizaciones. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 20(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2016140211spa
dcterms.referencesVarela Villegas, R. (2008). Innovación Empresarial: Arte y Ciencia en la Creación de Empresas (3, Ed.). Pearson Educaciónspa
dcterms.referencesVargas, F. (2022). How do Firms Innovate in Latin America? Identification of Innovation Strategies and Their Main Adoption Determinants. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004211eng
dcterms.referencesVenkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Forster, W. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Whither the Promise? Moving Forward with Entrepreneurshi as a Science of the Artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0077eng
dcterms.referencesVolberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0503eng
dcterms.referencesvon Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An Outline of General System Theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.eng
dcterms.referencesWest, G. P. I., & Bamford, C. E. (2005). Creating a technology-based entrepreneurial economy: A resource-based perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-2588-1eng
dcterms.referencesWest, G. P. I., Bamford, C. E., & Marsden, J. R. (2008). Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Development in Emerging Latin American Economies: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00213.xeng
dcterms.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2014.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesWorld Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48300eng
dcterms.referencesWurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022). Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(5), 1091–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211061896eng
dcterms.referencesYang, P., Liu, X., Hu, Y., & Gao, Y. (2022). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and urban economic growth-from the knowledge-based view. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(3), 239– 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2023.02.002eng
dcterms.referencesYescas, M. A. (2022). Resiliencia empresarial: Estrategias tecnológicas y de innovación como respuesta a la COVID-19. Universidad de Colima. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363066325_Resiliencia_empresarial_Estrategia s_tecnologicas_y_de_innovacion_como_respuesta_a_la_COVID-19spa
dcterms.referencesZahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002a). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995eng
dcterms.referencesZahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002b). International entrepreneurship: The current status of the field and future research agenda. En M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset (pp. 255– 288). Blackwell Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesZeng, J., Hu, X., Cai, S., & Xiao, J. (2019). Solving knowledge transfer problem in green innovation through absorptive capacity: A multi‑actor perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2306eng
dcterms.referencesZhou, Y. (2020). Estudio del emprendimiento en China. El caso de siete startups de éxito [Universitat Politècnica de València, Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería]. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/159397spa
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
sb.investigacionGestión de la tecnología y la innovaciónspa
sb.programaDoctorado en Gestión de la Tecnología y la Innovaciónspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF_RESUMEN.pdf
Tamaño:
397.76 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
5.79 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Tesis

Universidad Simón Bolívar: Todos los derechos reservados / Sistema de biblioteca