Statin associated adverse reactions in Latin America: a scoping review

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.contributor.authorUrina-Jassir, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPacheco-Paez, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorPaez-Canro, Carol
dc.contributor.authorUrina-Triana, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T20:50:03Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T20:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjectives We aim to describe the frequency and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients on statins in published studies from Latin American (LATAM) countries. Design Scoping review. Methods A literature search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and LILACS) in addition to a manual search in relevant journals from LATAM universities or medical societies. A snowballing technique was used to identify further references. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies between 2000 and 2020 were included. Studies were considered eligible if they included adults on statin therapy from LATAM and reported data on ADRs. Data on ADRs were abstracted and presented by study design. Results Out of 8076 articles, a total of 20 studies were included (7 RCTs and 13 observational studies). We identified three head-to-head statin RCTs, two statinversus-policosanol RCTs and only two placebo-controlled trials. The statin-related ADRs frequency ranged from 0% to 35.1% in RCTs and 0% to 28.4% in observational studies. The most common ADRs were muscle-related events including myalgia and elevated creatine phosphokinase. Other reported ADRs were gastrointestinal symptoms, headache and altered fasting plasma glucose.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.identifier.citationUrina-Jassir M, Pacheco-Paez T, Paez-Canro C, et al. Statin associated adverse reactions in Latin America: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e050675. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2021-050675spa
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050675
dc.identifier.issn20446055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/8603
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/10/e050675.full?ijkey=xzdbEDxRN2rDqIc&keytype=ref
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionaleng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceBMJ Openeng
dc.sourceVol. 11, No. 10 (2021)
dc.titleStatin associated adverse reactions in Latin America: a scoping revieweng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.spaArtículo científicospa
dcterms.referencesArnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American heart association Task force on clinical practice guidelineseng
dcterms.referencesGrundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/ AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:e285–350.eng
dcterms.referencesMach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020;41:111–88.eng
dcterms.referencesByrne P, Cullinan J, Smith SM. Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. BMJ 2019;8:l5674–5.eng
dcterms.referencesRedberg RF, Katz MH. Statins for primary prevention: the debate is intense, but the data are weak. JAMA 2016;316:1979–81.eng
dcterms.referencesYebyo HG, Aschmann HE, Kaufmann M, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants. Am Heart J 2019;210:18–28.eng
dcterms.referencesKoskinas KC, Siontis GCM, Piccolo R, et al. Effect of statins and non-statin LDL-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in secondary prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1172–80.eng
dcterms.referencesGuglielmi V, Bellia A, Pecchioli S, et al. Effectiveness of adherence to lipid lowering therapy on LDL-cholesterol in patients with very high cardiovascular risk: a real-world evidence study in primary care. Atherosclerosis 2017;263:36–41.eng
dcterms.referencesHope HF, Binkley GM, Fenton S, et al. Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. PLoS One 2019;14:1–38.eng
dcterms.referencesKim MC, Cho JY, Jeong HC, et al. Impact of postdischarge statin withdrawal on long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:1–7.eng
dcterms.referencesIngersgaard MV, Helms Andersen T, Norgaard O, et al. Reasons for Nonadherence to Statins - A Systematic Review of Reviews. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020;14:675–91.eng
dcterms.referencesThompson PD, Panza G, Zaleski A, et al. Statin-associated side effects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:2395–410.eng
dcterms.referencesNavar AM, Peterson ED, Li S, et al. Prevalence and management of symptoms associated with statin therapy in community practice: insights from the palm (patient and provider assessment of lipid management) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018;11:1–5.eng
dcterms.referencesGanga HV, Slim HB, Thompson PD. A systematic review of statin-induced muscle problems in clinical trials. Am Heart J 2014;168:6–15.eng
dcterms.referencesRivera-Andrade A, Luna MA. Trends and heterogeneity of cardiovascular disease and risk factors across Latin American and Caribbean countries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014;57:276–85.eng
dcterms.referencesPagan E, Chatenoud L, Rodriguez T, et al. Comparison of trends in mortality from coronary heart and cerebrovascular diseases in North and South America: 1980 to 2013. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:862–71.eng
dcterms.referencesVinueza R, Boissonnet CP, Acevedo M, et al. Dyslipidemia in seven Latin American cities: CARMELA study. Prev Med 2010;50:106–11.eng
dcterms.referencesArksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.eng
dcterms.referencesLevac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 2010;5:1–9.eng
dcterms.referencesTricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73.eng
dcterms.referencesAronson JK, Ferner RE. Clarification of terminology in drug safety. Drug Saf 2005;28:851–70.eng
dcterms.referencesMiller SA, Forrest JL. Enhancing your practice through evidencebased decision making: PICO, learning how to ask good questions. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice 2001;1:136–41.eng
dcterms.referencesOuzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile APP for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:1–11.eng
dcterms.referencesMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097eng
dcterms.referencesVattimo ACA, Fonseca FAH, Morais DC, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe compared with a fixed-dose combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe in Brazilian patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia: a multicenter, randomized trial. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2020;93:100595.eng
dcterms.referencesCastaño G, Más R, Fernández JC, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of policosanol compared with lovastatin in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia and concomitant coronary risk factors. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2000;61:137–46eng
dcterms.referencesFernández JC, Más R, Castaño G, et al. Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Policosanol versus fluvastatin in elderly hypercholesterolaemic women. Clin Drug Investig 2001;21:103–13.eng
dcterms.referencesTalavera J-O, Martinez G, Cervantes J-L, et al. A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on triglyceride levels in Mexican hypertriglyceridemic patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2013;29:379–86eng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez-Roa E, Téllez R, Rodríguez F, et al. Evaluación comparativa de la efectividad clínica de DOS formulaciones de atorvastatina en pacientes Con O Sin enfermedad cardiovascular. Rev Latinoam Hipertens 2008;3:129–35 https://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=170217040005eng
dcterms.referencesFonseca FAH, Ruiz A, Cardona-Muñoz EG, et al. The DISCOVERY PENTA study: a DIrect Statin COmparison of LDL-C Value--an Evaluation of Rosuvastatin therapY compared with atorvastatin. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:1307–15.eng
dcterms.referencesAlbert MA, Glynn RJ, Fonseca FAH, et al. Race, ethnicity, and the efficacy of rosuvastatin in primary prevention: the Justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial. Am Heart J 2011;162:106–14eng
dcterms.referencesRidker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2195–207eng
dcterms.referencesCuneo C, Kotliar C, Medrano JC, et al. Logro de Los objetivos de colesterol de lipoproteínas de Baja densidad en 18 países fuera de Europa occidental: estudio Internacional de prácticas de manejo del colesterol (ICLPS) sub análisis argentino. Rev Fed Arg Cardiol 2019;48:86–91 https://www.fac.org.ar/archivo/2/revista/19v48n2/ especial/01/cuneo.phpspa
dcterms.referencesSpalvieri MP, Oyola ME. Estatinas: incidencia de efectos adversos / statins: incidence of adverse effects / Estatinas: incidência de efeitos adversos. Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam 2011;45:727–65 https://www. redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=53521525005eng
dcterms.referencesGabriel Bottaro E, Caravello Óscar, Gustavo Scapellato P, et al. Rosuvastatina para tratamiento de la dislipidemia en pacientes infectados Con VIH en tratamiento antirretroviral de gran actividad. Experiencia preliminar. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2008;26:325–9spa
dcterms.referencesdo Nascimento RCRM, Guerra AA, Alvares J, et al. Statin use in Brazil: findings and implications. Curr Med Res Opin 2018;34:1809–17.spa
dcterms.referencesSmiderle L, Lima LO, Hutz MH, et al. Evaluation of sexual dimorphism in the efficacy and safety of simvastatin/atorvastatin therapy in a southern Brazilian cohort. Arq Bras Cardiol 2014;103:33–40.eng
dcterms.referencesFerreira Castro P, Ribeiro E, Lima Dorea E, et al. Factors associated with statin-related adverse muscular events in adult dyslipidemic outpatients. Bras J Pharm Sci 2017;53:e00199.eng
dcterms.referencesSantos PCJL, Morgan AC, Jannes CE, et al. Presence and type of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the lipid profile and response to lipid-lowering therapy in Brazilian patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 2014;233:206–10eng
dcterms.referencesZuluaga-Quintero N, Arcila-Hincapie L, Bedoya-Lopez DF, et al. Comportamiento del perfil lípidico en paciente Con dislipidemia tratados Con estatinas en Una iPS. CES Salud Pública 2015;6:63–9.spa
dcterms.referencesRuiz Álvaro J., Vargas-Uricoechea H, Urina-Triana M, et al. Las dislipidemias Y SU tratamiento en centros de alta complejidad en Colombia. Clin e Investig en Arterioscler 2020;32:101–10.spa
dcterms.referencesDiaztagle JJ, Castro CA, Buitrago DC. Experiencia en la utilización de hipolipemiantes en una cohorte de pacientes en 12 ciudades colombianas. Rev Medicas UIS 2019;32:13–20spa
dcterms.referencesToro Escobar JM, Toro CMA, Maya GC. Prevalencia de alteraciones de la creatina-fosfoquinasa (CPK) sérica en pacientes que toman estatinas. Med Lab 2010;16:141–52spa
dcterms.referencesBello-Chavolla OY, Aguilar-Salinas CA. Factors influencing achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in Mexico: the International cholesterol management practice study. Rev Invest Clin 2019;71:408–16.eng
dcterms.referencesCarrillo-Alarcon LC, Chavez-Gallegos D, Ocampo-Torres M, et al. Characterization of polypharmacy in the elderly in three units of health services in Pachuca, Hidalgo. Int Res J Pharm 2015;6:25–30. doi:10.7897/2230-8407.0616eng
dcterms.referencesFinegold JA, Manisty CH, Goldacre B, et al. What proportion of symptomatic side effects in patients taking statins are genuinely caused by the drug? systematic review of randomized placebocontrolled trials to aid individual patient choice. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014;21:464–74eng
dcterms.referencesPenson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, et al. Introducing the 'Drucebo' effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statin-associated muscle symptoms, under blinded and open-label conditions. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9:1023–33.eng
dcterms.referencesGolomb BA. Misinterpretation of trial evidence on statin adverse effects may harm patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015;22:492–3.eng
dcterms.referencesHovingh GK, Gandra SR, McKendrick J, et al. Identification and management of patients with statin-associated symptoms in clinical practice: a clinician survey. Atherosclerosis 2016;245:111–7.eng
dcterms.referencesRosenson RS, Gandra SR, McKendrick J, et al. Identification and management of Statin-Associated symptoms in clinical practice: extension of a clinician survey to 12 further countries. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017;31:187–95.eng
dcterms.referencesGolomb BA, Evans MA. Statin adverse effects : a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2008;8:373–418.eng
dcterms.referencesBhardwaj S, Selvarajah S, Schneider EB. Muscular effects of statins in the elderly female: a review. Clin Interv Aging 2013;8:47–59eng
dcterms.referencesCham S, Evans MA, Denenberg JO, et al. Statin-associated muscle-related adverse effects: a case series of 354 patients. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:541–53.eng
dcterms.referencesHolbrook A, Wright M, Sung M, et al. Statin-associated rhabdomyolysis: is there a dose-response relationship? Can J Cardiol 2011;27:146–51.eng
dcterms.referencesRosenson RS. Trial designs for statin muscle intolerance. Curr Opin Lipidol 2017;28:488–94.eng
dcterms.referencesFalk Delgado A, Falk Delgado A. The association of funding source on effect size in randomized controlled trials: 2013-2015 - a crosssectional survey and meta-analysis. Trials 2017;18:125.eng
dcterms.referencesLewis SC, Warlow CP. How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:181–7.eng
dcterms.referencesHemkens LG. How routinely collected data for randomized trials provide long-term randomized real-world evidence. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e186014.eng
dcterms.referencesHeneghan C, Goldacre B, Mahtani KR. Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients. Trials 2017;18:122.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
656.32 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
PDF
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
381 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones