Superior Pedicle inverted T-reduction mammaplasty with short horizontal scar

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.contributor.authorArbeláez, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorArbeláez, Sergio A.
dc.contributor.authorEslait, Rosa C.
dc.contributor.authorLacouture, Carlos J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T22:12:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-04T22:12:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: Superior pedicle breast reduction is a very popular technique among plastic surgeons. This technique has had many variations looking for fewer complications and better long-lasting results. The aim of this article is to present a novel technique of breast reduction, making variations in the design of the periareolar incision, using a superior pedicle with a constant vertical incision of 5 cm and a shortened horizontal incision. Methods: The superior pedicle inverted T-mammoplasty with a shortened horizontal scar technique was performed in 1200 patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2023; follow-up examination was carried out for an average of 1 year (3 months to 3 years). A patient satisfaction survey was conducted. Results: Patient satisfaction rate was 99%. There were no cases of total necrosis of the areola–nipple complex, 2.7% of the patients presented partial necrosis of the areola– nipple complex, 1.4% of the patients presented local infection, 1.7% presented dehiscence at some point of the vertical or horizontal suture, 4% of the patients presented a widened scar, 8% of the patients presented alteration in the sensibility of the areola–nipple complex, and 0.6% of the patients presented hematoma. With this technique, a rise of the areola–nipple complex of up to 22cm was achieved. Conclusions: The superior pedicle inverted T-mammaplasty with shortened horizontal scar technique showed a lower number of surgical complications compared with other techniques previously used for breast reduction, even when applied in gigantomasty. It provides lasting results and a high rate of patient satisfaction. (Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12:e5625; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005625; Published online 20 February 2024.)spa
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.citationArbeláez, Sergio MD*; Arbeláez, Sergio A. MD†; Eslait, Rosa C. MD*; Lacouture, Carlos J. MD†. Superior Pedicle Inverted T-reduction Mammaplasty with Short Horizontal Scar. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open 12(2):p e5625, February 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005625
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005625
dc.identifier.issn21697574  (Electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16213
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/2024/02000/superior_pedicle_inverted_t_reduction_mammaplasty.55.aspx
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinseng
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.titleSuperior Pedicle inverted T-reduction mammaplasty with short horizontal scareng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.spaOtros
dcterms.referencesAmerican Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics report 2020. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics 2020. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery. org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics- full-report-2020.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2024.eng
dcterms.referencesÖreroğlu AR. Modified central pedicle in breast reduction and mastopexy: the dermal suspension technique. Aesth Plast Surg. 2022;46:2753–2765.eng
dcterms.referencesShiffman MA. History of breast reduction. In: Shiffman M.A., ed. Mastopexy and Breast Reduction, Heidelberg/ Berlin: Sprin ger;2009:43–49eng
dcterms.referencesPeixoto G. Reduction mammaplastic: a personal technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65:217–226.eng
dcterms.referencesBerrocal M. Mamoplastia reductora con incisión mínima en J. Rev colomb Cir Plást Reconstr. 2002;8:73–83.spa
dcterms.referencesWise RJA. preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1956;17:367–375.eng
dcterms.referencesArie G. Una nueva técnica de mamoplastia. Cir plast iberoam. 1957;3:23–31.spa
dcterms.referencesStrombeck JO. Mammaplasty: report of a new technique based on the two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg. 1960;13:79–90.eng
dcterms.referencesPitanguy I. Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg. 1967;20:78–85.eng
dcterms.referencesMatarraso A. Courtiss EH. Suction mammoplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:709–717.eng
dcterms.referencesBenelli L. Tecnique de plastie mammaire Le “Round bloc. Aesth Plast Surg. 1990;14:93–100.eng
dcterms.referencesLassus C. Breast reduction: evolution of a technique-a single vertical scar. Aesth Plast Surg. 1987;11:107–112.eng
dcterms.referencesMalianac JW. A Mamma plastic substitute for amputation in hypertrophy. Surgery. 1949;26:573–579.eng
dcterms.referencesMorestin H. Plastic mamma ire de reduction. Cas Bull Mem Soc Anat. 1995;80:682–890.eng
dcterms.referencesSchwartzmann E. Die technik der mammaplastik. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;1:107–110.eng
dcterms.referencesLejour M. Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:100–114.eng
dcterms.referencesMallucci P, Branford OA. Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:436–447.eng
dcterms.referencesMallucci P, Branford OA. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS. 2012;65:8–16.eng
dcterms.referencesBerrocal Revueltas M. Mamoplastia reductora con incisión mínima en J: una alternativa ideal en el manejo de las gigantomastias. Rev Co Cir Plást. 2000;4:15–19.spa
dcterms.referencesZehm S, Puelzl P, Wechselberger G, et al. Inferior pole length and long-term aesthetic outcome after superior and inferior pedicled reduction mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:1128–1133.eng
dcterms.referencesDavison S, Nesbahi A. The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various skin reduction patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1466–1476.eng
dcterms.referencesSapino G, Haselbach D, Watfa W, et al. Evaluation of longterm breast shape in inferior versus superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a comparative study. Gland Surg. 2021;10:1018–1028.eng
dcterms.referencesHandel N, Yegiyants S. Managing necrosis of the nipple areolar complex following reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43:415–423.eng
dcterms.referencesCosta M, Ferreira MC. Thin superior medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe hypertrophy. Aesth Plast Surg. 2008;32:645–652.eng
dcterms.referencesWettstein R, Christofides E, Pittet B, et al. Superior pedicle breast reduction for hypertrophy with massive ptosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:500–507.eng
dcterms.referencesJaramillo R, Arias C. Breast reduction with total superior pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;1:1–11.eng
dcterms.referencesBilgen F, Ural A, Bekerecioğlu M. Inferior and central mound pedicle breast reduction in gigantomastia: a safe alternative? J Invest Surg. 2019;34:401–407.eng
dcterms.referencesBustos SS, Molinar V, Kuruoglu D, et al. Inferior pedicle breast reduction and long nipple-to-inframammary fold distance: how long is safe? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surgy. 2021;74:495–503.eng
dcterms.referencesreduction with prefiguration of final shape: a 10-year retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;8:e3242–e3242.eng
dcterms.referencesNahai FR. MOC-PS CME Article: breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;1:1–13.eng
dcterms.referencesCollins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M, et al. The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical intervention in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1556–1566.eng
dcterms.referencesMiller BJ, Morris SF, Sigurdson LL, et al. Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;115:1025–1031.eng
dcterms.referencesSchlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, et al. Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;115:743–751.eng
dcterms.referencesHall-Findlay EJD. Discussion: the blood supply of the breast revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1400;2015:1398.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
sb.programaEspecialización en Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estéticaspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
1.07 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: