Efectividad de la facoemulsificación en pacientes con ángulo estrecho en una clínica de referencia en Colombia: Estudio retrospectivo 2019 a 2024

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.contributor.advisorEscaf, Luis José
dc.contributor.advisorGómez, Nora
dc.contributor.advisorPolo Gallardo, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorFernández Motta, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorAlandete Amell, Ángela María
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-07T14:52:05Z
dc.date.available2025-07-07T14:52:05Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractEl glaucoma es una neuropatía óptica progresiva, siendo una de las principales causas de ceguera irreversible a nivel mundial. Específicamente, el glaucoma de ángulo cerrado se caracteriza por la estrechez del ángulo iridocorneal, lo que puede provocar un aumento de la presión intraocular; en estos casos, la cirugía de catarata podría resultar beneficiosa, ya que contribuye a ampliar dicho ángulo y mejorar el drenaje del humor acuoso. Metodología: Se llevó a cabo un estudio cuasi experimental, retrospectivo y unicéntrico en una clínica de referencia, incluyendo 35 ojos de 21 pacientes con ángulo estrecho, dentro de los que se incluyeran los diagnósticos de: sospecha de glaucoma con ángulo estrecho, sospecha de cierre angular primario, cierre angular primario o Glaucoma primario de ángulo cerrado (GPAC), los cuales debían tener PIO ≥ 24 mmHg y ser sometidos a facoemulsificación entre 2019 y 2024. Se evaluó la efectividad de dicho procedimiento, mediante la evaluación de la apertura angular mediante gonioscopia (clasificación de Shaffer), y el adecuado control y cambios en la presión intraocular (PIO). Se aplicaron pruebas estadísticas paramétricas y no paramétricas, con un valor de significación de p < 0.05. Resultados: Tras la cirugía, se observó una mejora significativa en la apertura angular, una reducción sostenida de la PIO y una menor necesidad de tratamiento farmacológico. Conclusión: La facoemulsificación resulta efectiva en la mayoría de los pacientes con ángulo estrecho.spa
dc.description.abstractGlaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy and one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Specifically, angle-closure glaucoma is characterized by narrowing of the iridocorneal angle, which may lead to increased intraocular pressure (IOP); in such cases, cataract surgery may be beneficial, as it helps to widen the angle and improve aqueous humor outflow. Methods: A quasi experimental, retrospective, and single-center study was conducted at a referral clinic, including 35 eyes from 21 patients with narrow angles, encompassing the following diagnoses: suspected glaucoma with narrow angle, suspected primary angle closure, primary angle closure, or primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). All included cases had IOP ≥ 24 mmHg and underwent phacoemulsification between 2019 and 2024. The effectiveness of the procedure was assessed by evaluating angle width through gonioscopy (Shaffer classification) and monitoring appropriate control and changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). Both parametric and non parametric statistical tests were applied, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Following surgery, a significant improvement in angle width, a sustained reduction in IOP, and a decreased need for pharmacological treatment were observed. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification is effective in the majority of patients with narrow angles.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16802
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationaleng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectÁngulo estrechospa
dc.subjectSospecha de glaucomaspa
dc.subjectSospecha de cierre angularspa
dc.subjectCierre angularspa
dc.subjectGlaucoma de ángulo cerradospa
dc.subjectFacoemulsificaciónspa
dc.subjectPresión intraocularspa
dc.subjectGonioscopiaspa
dc.subject.keywordsNarrow angleeng
dc.subject.keywordsSuspected glaucomaeng
dc.subject.keywordsSuspected angle closureeng
dc.subject.keywordsAngle closureeng
dc.subject.keywordsAngle-closure glaucomaeng
dc.subject.keywordsPhacoemulsificationeng
dc.subject.keywordsIntraocular pressureeng
dc.subject.keywordsGonioscopyeng
dc.titleEfectividad de la facoemulsificación en pacientes con ángulo estrecho en una clínica de referencia en Colombia: Estudio retrospectivo 2019 a 2024spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.spaOtros
dcterms.referencesKingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:887-8eng
dcterms.referencesJayaram H, Kolko M, Friedman DS, Gazzard G. Glaucoma: now and beyond. Lancet. 2023;402(10414):1788-801.eng
dcterms.referencesGiangiacomo A, Coleman AL. The epidemiology of glaucoma. In: Glaucoma. 2009. p. 13-21eng
dcterms.referencesTham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081- 90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. PMID: 24974815.eng
dcterms.referencesSrivastav Y, Taj B, Singh J, Yadav S, Ahmad M. Glaucoma (eye disease) and its associated diagnosis and treatment process: a schematic concise review. Ophthalmol Res Int J. 2024;19(3):42-50.eng
dcterms.referencesSpratt A, Kotecha A, Viswanathan A. Quality of life in glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2008;39-45. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1022eng
dcterms.referencesSharif NA. Various forms of glaucoma and their treatments. In: Handbook of Basic and Clinical Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Academic Press; 2022. p. 251-88eng
dcterms.referencesKing A, Azuara-Blanco A, Tuulonen A. Glaucoma. BMJ. 2013;346:f3518. doi:10.1136/bmj.f3518.spa
dcterms.referencesFea AM, Dallorto L, Lavia C, Pignata G, Rolle T, Aung T. Long-term outcomes after acute primary angle closure of Caucasian chronic angle closure glaucoma patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(3):232-9.eng
dcterms.referencesShalaby WS, Reddy R, Razeghinejad R, Katz LJ. Contemporary approach to narrow angles. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2024;19(1):88.eng
dcterms.referencesFlores-Sánchez BC, Tatham AJ. Acute angle closure glaucoma. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019;80(12):C174-C179.eng
dcterms.referencesFu L, Liu X, Zhang L, Lou J, Zheng X, Wang X, et al. The aqueous humour dynamics in primary angle closure disease: a computational study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025;109(3):333-9eng
dcterms.referencesGoel M, Picciani RG, Lee RK, Bhattacharya SK. Aqueous humor dynamics: a review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2010;4:52.eng
dcterms.referencesWilson MR, Gallardo M, Nassiri N. Laser and surgery treatment of angleclosure glaucoma. In: Albert and Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 1735-51.eng
dcterms.referencesHe M, Friedman DS, Ge J, Huang W, Jin C, Lee PS, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects: biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: the Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.053. PMID: 17123610.eng
dcterms.referencesRitch R, Tham CC, Lam DS. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI): an update. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;52(3):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.02.006. PMID: 17472803eng
dcterms.referencesSong Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Tang G, Wan KH, Lee JW, et al. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022;11(5):460- 9.eng
dcterms.referencesTarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(2):211-25.eng
dcterms.referencesSchlote T. Cyclodestructive procedures. In: Surgical management of inflammatory eye disease. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 193-200.eng
dcterms.referencesLi M, Zhu W, Fan X, Sun X, Kong X. Outcomes of filtering surgery versus clear lens extraction in young patients with angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb;258:145-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.07.025. PMID: 37543298eng
dcterms.referencesAwad AA, Alkorbi HA, Serhan HA. Charles Kelman: the father of phacoemulsification. Cureus. 2024;16(6)eng
dcterms.referencesToyama T, Ueta T, Yoshitani M, Sakata R, Numaga J. Visual acuity improvement after phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients aged ≥90 years. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:1-6.eng
dcterms.referencesAzuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, Cooper D, Foster PJ, Friedman DS, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1389-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(16)30956-4. PMID: 27707497eng
dcterms.referencesMoghimi S, Lin S. Role of phacoemulsification in angle closure glaucoma. Eye Sci. 2011 Sep;26(3):121-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4432.2011.03.001. PMID: 21913342.eng
dcterms.referencesSingh K, Aggarwal H, Bhattacharyya M. Phacoemulsification in angle closure glaucoma: a 360° evaluation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;72(9):1275- 9. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1701_23eng
dcterms.referencesZhang N, Wang J, Chen B, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;7:624179eng
dcterms.referencesRueda JG, Gomez R, Parra J, Moll SR, Orozco L, Vera L. Glaucoma screening in Colombian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(13):3414eng
dcterms.referencesKhazaeni B, Zeppieri M, Khazaeni L. Acute angle-closure glaucoma.spa
dcterms.referencesGeorge R, Panda S, Vijaya L. Blindness in glaucoma: primary open-angle glaucoma versus primary angle-closure glaucoma—a meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). 2022;36(11):2099-105eng
dcterms.referencesChan PP, Li EY, Tham CC. Cost-effectiveness in the treatment of glaucoma. J Cost Eff Treat Glaucoma. 2014.eng
dcterms.referencesSarkar D, Sharma R, Singh P, Verma V, Karkhur S, Verma S, et al. Age related cataract: prevalence, epidemiological pattern and a cross-sectional study from Central India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;71(5):1905-12. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2020_22. PMID: 37203054; PMCID: PMC10391463.eng
dcterms.referencesQuaranta L, Riva I, Gerardi C, Oddone F, Floriani I, Konstas AG. Quality of life in glaucoma: a review of the literature. Adv Ther. 2016 Jun;33(6):959-81. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0333- 6. PMID: 27138604; PMCID: PMC4920851.eng
dcterms.referencesStanley RG. Ocular clinical pharmacology. Small Anim Clin Pharmacol. 2008;2:557-73eng
dcterms.referencesPeters DH, Garg A, Bloom G, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Rahman MH. Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161-71. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.011. PMID: 17954679.eng
dcterms.referencesMachiele R, Motlagh M, Zeppieri M, Patel BC. Intraocular pressure. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024eng
dcterms.referencesZamylko M, Żuk P, Dybciak P, Prusaczyk A, Karczmarz S. Family medicine in rural area— perspectives and development opportunities. Int J Integr Care. 2023;23(S1).eng
dcterms.referencesSaha BC, Kumari R. Lifestyle modifications–a new dimension in glaucoma management. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2022;34(3):199-207.eng
dcterms.referencesKhazaeni B, Zeppieri M, Khazaeni L. Acute angle-closure glaucomaeng
dcterms.referencesDavid R, Tessler Z, Yassur Y. Resultados a largo plazo del glaucoma agudo primario de ángulo cerrado. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Apr;69(4):261-2.spa
dcterms.referencesAtalay E, Nongpiur ME, Baskaran M, Sharma S, Perera SA, Aung T. Factores biométricos asociados con el cierre angular primario agudo: comparación del ojo afectado y el ojo contralateral. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5320-5.spa
dcterms.referencesLowe RF. Anterior lens curvature. Comparisons between normal eyes and those with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56:409–13eng
dcterms.referencesLowe RF, Clark BA. Radius of curvature of the anterior lens surface. Correlations in normal eyes and in eyes involved with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57:471–4.eng
dcterms.referencesGedde SJ, Chen PP, Muir KW, Vinod K, Lind JT, Wright MM, et al. Primary angle-closure disease preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):P30–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.021.eng
dcterms.referencesChan PP, Tham CC. Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG): a logical approach based on angle closures types and mechanism. In: Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) a logical approach in management. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 1-6.eng
dcterms.referencesFaiq M, Sharma R, Dada R, Mohanty K, Saluja D, Dada T. Genetic, biochemical and clinical insights into primary congenital glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013;7(2):66.eng
dcterms.referencesTham CC, editor. Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG): a logical approach in management. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2020.eng
dcterms.referencesPiñero RT, Lora M, Andrés MI. Glaucoma: patogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Offarm. 2005;24(2):88-96.spa
dcterms.referencesAhmad SS. Glaucoma suspects: a practical approach. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018;8(2):74-81.eng
dcterms.referencesJenchitr W, Jaradaroonchay M. The relationship of refractive error and glaucoma in a university eye clinic. J Curr Sci Technol. 2021;11(3):432-41.eng
dcterms.referencesNolan WP, Aung T, Foster PJ, Chan YH, Baasanhu J, Khaw PT, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in two East Asian populations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(13):3174eng
dcterms.referencesSyafutri S, Ilahi F. The difference of lens thickness in acute and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma. Bioscientia Med. 2023;6(17):2926-9.eng
dcterms.referencesSherpa D, Badhu BP. Association between axial length of the eye and primary angle closure glaucoma. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2008;6(3):361-3.eng
dcterms.referencesPavlin CJ, Ritch R, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in plateau iris syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:390-5.eng
dcterms.referencesRitch R. Plateau iris is caused by abnormally positioned ciliary processes. J Glaucoma. 1992;1:23-6.eng
dcterms.referencesColeman AL, Kodjebacheva G. Risk factors for glaucoma needing more attention. Open Ophthalmol J. 2009;3:38.eng
dcterms.referencesKass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):701-13; discussion 829-30. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.701. PMID: 12049574.eng
dcterms.referencesKeller MJ, Gast TJ, King BJ. Advancements in high-resolution imaging of the iridocorneal angle. Front Ophthalmol. 2023;3:1229670.eng
dcterms.referencesAbu-Hassan DW, Acott TS, Kelley MJ. The trabecular meshwork: a basic review of form and function. J Ocul Biol. 2014;2(1).eng
dcterms.referencesFaschinger C, Hommer A. Anatomical structures of the chamber angle. In: Gonioscopy. 2012. p. 11-23.eng
dcterms.referencesPérez-González H, Garcia-Concha Y, Gómez-Martínez N. Cierre angular primario: opciones quirúrgicas. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2014;88(4):182-5spa
dcterms.referencesCardin ML, Várguez JP, Espinosa-Rebolledo AE, Méndez-Domínguez N. Angle-closure glaucoma secondary to ciliary body cysts treated with subliminal transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: report of a case. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2021;96(12):653- 7eng
dcterms.referencesCastañeda-Díez R, Mayorquín-Ruiz M, Esponda-Lamoglia C, Albis Donado O. Current diagnosis and management of angle-closure glaucoma. In: Glaucoma—current clinical and research aspects. IntechOpen; 2011eng
dcterms.referencesKällmark FP, Sakhi M. Evaluation of nasal and temporal anterior chamber angle with four different techniques. Int J Clin Med. 2013;4(12):548-55eng
dcterms.referencesCraven ER, Chopra V, Goldberg JL, Marion KM, Chen X, Chang CT, et al. Comparison of iridocorneal angle assessments in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients: anterior segment optical coherence tomography and gonioscopy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:1301-12eng
dcterms.referencesUhm KB, Lee JM, Sung HK. Comparison of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in primary angle-closure glaucoma with and without acute attack. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19(3):201-7.eng
dcterms.referencesBrusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M. How to measure intraocular pressure: an updated review of various tonometers. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 27;10(17):3860. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173860. PMID: 34501306; PMCID: PMC8456330eng
dcterms.referencesGirija K, Smitha VK, Ashok A. Ultrasound biomicroscopy: an overview. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2018;30(3):216-8.eng
dcterms.referencesAng M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Dos Santos VA, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:132-56eng
dcterms.referencesPalmer LD, Thompson AC, Asrani S. Diagnosing glaucoma progression with optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 1;36(2):130-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001106. PMID: 39508405.eng
dcterms.referencesBroadway DC. Visual field testing for glaucoma - a practical guide. Community Eye Health. 2012;25(79-80):66-70. PMID: 23520423; PMCID: PMC3588129.eng
dcterms.referencesIbraheem MYT, Alhasa JAA. Pharmacological advances in glaucoma management. Sch Acad J Biosci. 2024;9:301-10eng
dcterms.referencesAzuara-Blanco A, Burr JM, Cochran C, Ramsay C, Vale L, Foster P, et al. The effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle- closure glaucoma (EAGLE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 May 23;12:133. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215- 12-133. PMID: 21605352; PMCID: PMC3121608.eng
dcterms.referencesHulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.eng
dcterms.referencesHarris AD, McGregor JC, Perencevich EN, Furuno JP, Zhu J, Peterson DE, Finkelstein J. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(1):16–23.eng
dcterms.referencesTaşlipinar Uzel AG, Koru M, Ozates S, Kaya P, Certel I, Uzel MM. Anterior segment parameters as predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after cataract surgery in patients without glaucoma. J Glaucoma Cataract. 2023;18(4).eng
dcterms.referencesShahid E, Fasih U, Shaikh A. Postoperative complications of trabeculectomy in primary open angle glaucoma versus primary angle closure glaucoma. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2022;38(2).eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
sb.programaEspecialización en Oftalmologíaspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF_Resumen.pdf
Tamaño:
224.44 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
1.44 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones