La ejecución en el proceso ejecutivo para la efectividad de la garantía real hipotecaria del C.G.P. frente al registro anterior de la medida cautelar de embargo ordenado dentro de un proceso coactivo sobre el inmueble objeto de la garantía
Cargando...
Fecha
2021
Autores
Ramos Torres, Noris Carolina
Pérez Muñoz, Uriel Andrés
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
Este proyecto de investigación se centra en hacer un estudio de la controversia jurídica que se suscita cuando en un proceso ejecutivo para la efectividad de la garantía real hipotecaria del C.G.P. existe una medida cautelar de embargo previa ordenada dentro de un proceso coactivo.
Para esta tesis se realizó una revisión de los puntos relevantes que permitieran desarrollar el tema objeto de investigación los cuales fueron: proceso ejecutivo con título prendario o hipotecario con la práctica de medida cautelar de embargo y secuestro, generalidades de las medidas cautelares, la jurisdicción coactiva, y la prelación de embargos con la concurrencia de los mismos. Cada uno de los textos fue expuesto de manera detallada, pero limitando la información únicamente a lo que pudiera relacionarse con el estudio, de tal manera que fuera de fácil comprensión y a su vez alcanzara los objetivos propuestos.
Para el desarrollo de la investigación fue aplicada una encuesta semiestructurada de seis (06) preguntas a algunos jueces de la ciudad de Cartagena, a fin de conocer un poco de su experiencia en el tema, y si en la práctica habían tenido la controversia aquí planteada, ello con la finalidad de conocer que posible solución le habían dado o le darían en caso de encontrarse de cara a dicho caso.
Al estudiar las respuestas que se profirieron en la encuesta, y un haciendo un sondeo general en algunos Juzgados de la ciudad de Cartagena, se pudo constatar que no existía un criterio unificado al momento de dar una solución al tema esbozado.
Como consecuencia de lo anterior esta tesis plantea una solución que puede ayudar a consolidar una respuesta a la disyuntiva jurídica trazada en el curso de este trabajo, lo que por consiguiente ocasionaría mayor seguridad jurídica para los litigantes y los propios funcionarios judiciales.
This research project focuses on making a study of the legal controversy that arises when in an executive process for the effectiveness of the C.G.P. there is a precautionary measure of prior embargo ordered within a coercive process. For this thesis, a review was carried out of the relevant points that allowed to develop the subject under investigation, which were: executive process with pledge or mortgage title with its practice of precautionary measure of seizure and kidnapping, generalities of precautionary measures, jurisdiction coercive, and the priority of embargoes with the concurrence of the same. Each of the texts was exposed in detail, but limiting the information only to what could be related to the study, in such a way that it was easy to understand and in turn reached the proposed objectives. For the development of the research, a semi-structured survey of five (05) questions was applied to some judges of the city of Cartagena, in order to know a little about their experience on the subject, and if in practice they had had the controversy raised here , with the purpose of knowing what possible solution they had given or would give him in case of being faced with said case. When studying the answers that were given in the survey, and a general survey that was carried out in some Courts of the city of Cartagena, it was found that there was no unified criterion at the time of giving a solution to the outlined issue. As a consequence of the foregoing, this thesis proposes a solution that can help to consolidate an answer to the legal dilemma outlined in the course of this work, which consequently would cause greater legal certainty for the litigants and the judicial officials themselves.
This research project focuses on making a study of the legal controversy that arises when in an executive process for the effectiveness of the C.G.P. there is a precautionary measure of prior embargo ordered within a coercive process. For this thesis, a review was carried out of the relevant points that allowed to develop the subject under investigation, which were: executive process with pledge or mortgage title with its practice of precautionary measure of seizure and kidnapping, generalities of precautionary measures, jurisdiction coercive, and the priority of embargoes with the concurrence of the same. Each of the texts was exposed in detail, but limiting the information only to what could be related to the study, in such a way that it was easy to understand and in turn reached the proposed objectives. For the development of the research, a semi-structured survey of five (05) questions was applied to some judges of the city of Cartagena, in order to know a little about their experience on the subject, and if in practice they had had the controversy raised here , with the purpose of knowing what possible solution they had given or would give him in case of being faced with said case. When studying the answers that were given in the survey, and a general survey that was carried out in some Courts of the city of Cartagena, it was found that there was no unified criterion at the time of giving a solution to the outlined issue. As a consequence of the foregoing, this thesis proposes a solution that can help to consolidate an answer to the legal dilemma outlined in the course of this work, which consequently would cause greater legal certainty for the litigants and the judicial officials themselves.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Proceso ejecutivo para la efectividad de la garantía real, Medidas cautelares, Jurisdicción coactiva, Prelación y concurrencia de embargos, Executive process for the effectiveness of the collateral, Precautionary measures, Coercive jurisdiction, Priority and concurrence of embargoes
