Las facultades legales del juez de decretar y practicar pruebas de oficio y las cargas procesales asignadas a las partes
Cargando...
Fecha
2021
Autores
Ángel Alfaro, Luis Eduardo
Guerrero Correa, Julian
Martínez Mosquera, Benjamín
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación es derivado del Proyecto de Investigación titulado Las Facultades Legales del Juez de Decretar y Practicar Pruebas de Oficio y las Cargas Procesales Asignadas a las Partes, presentado para optar por el título académico de Magíster en Derecho Procesal; se compuso de tres capítulos de libro acorde a la definición que por tales señala Colciencias, cada uno responde a cada objetivo del Proyecto de Investigación que inicialmente fue presentado como Anteproyecto, así las cosas, los tres capítulos responden a los objetivos de analizar las facultades legales del juez de decretar pruebas de oficio y las cargas procesales asignadas a las partes en relación con la materia probatoria, así como examinar el fundamento jurídico de la línea interpretativa restrictiva o self
restraint, Teoría del Garantismo Procesal, respecto a darle prelación al debido proceso y al principio de legalidad, que expone como relevante a la seguridad jurídica y limitan la aplicación del decreto y práctica de la prueba de oficio. Se pretende esbozar que el decreto probatorio oficioso debe limitarse a casos particulares con atención a ciertos criterios; y por último, Indagar el argumento judicial de la línea interpretativa del activismo judicial o interpretación dinámica o Teoría de la Escuela Publicista Procesal, respecto a la implementación de una aplicación extensiva de este tipo de facultades protectoras, permitiendo el decreto y práctica de pruebas de oficio en el derecho procesal civil.
This paper comes from the Research Project entitled The Legal Faculties of the Judge to Decree and Practice Ex oficio evidence and the Procedural Burdens Assigned to the Parties, this paper is presented to aspire to the academic title of Master in Procedural Law; It is composed of three scientific book chapters according to the definition indicated by Colciencias, each one responds to each objective of the Research Project that was initially presented as a Preliminary Project, thus, the three chapters respond to the objectives of analyzing legal powers of the judge to decree ex officio evidence and the procedural burdens assigned to the parties in relation to the evidentiary matter, as well as examine the legal basis of the restrictive interpretative line or self restraint, Theory of Procedural Guarantee, which applies in an extensive way these covering faculties to achieve due process and the principle of legality, which finds out that is relevant juridical certainty and limits the application of the decree and practice of the ex officio judicial evidence. It is intended to outline that the unofficial probationary decree should be limited to particular cases according to certain criteria; and finally, to investigate the judicial argument of the interpretative line of judicial activism or dynamic interpretation or Theory of the Procedural Publicist School, in relation to the implementation of an extensive application of this type of protective powers, allowing the decree and practice of ex officio evidence in civil procedural law.
This paper comes from the Research Project entitled The Legal Faculties of the Judge to Decree and Practice Ex oficio evidence and the Procedural Burdens Assigned to the Parties, this paper is presented to aspire to the academic title of Master in Procedural Law; It is composed of three scientific book chapters according to the definition indicated by Colciencias, each one responds to each objective of the Research Project that was initially presented as a Preliminary Project, thus, the three chapters respond to the objectives of analyzing legal powers of the judge to decree ex officio evidence and the procedural burdens assigned to the parties in relation to the evidentiary matter, as well as examine the legal basis of the restrictive interpretative line or self restraint, Theory of Procedural Guarantee, which applies in an extensive way these covering faculties to achieve due process and the principle of legality, which finds out that is relevant juridical certainty and limits the application of the decree and practice of the ex officio judicial evidence. It is intended to outline that the unofficial probationary decree should be limited to particular cases according to certain criteria; and finally, to investigate the judicial argument of the interpretative line of judicial activism or dynamic interpretation or Theory of the Procedural Publicist School, in relation to the implementation of an extensive application of this type of protective powers, allowing the decree and practice of ex officio evidence in civil procedural law.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Proceso judicial civil, Juez, Partes, Facultades, Prueba de oficio, Decreto oficioso probatorio, Civil law suit, Judge, Parties, Faculties, Ex officio evidence, Ex officio evidence decree