Apropiaciones y perspectivas de los abogados en formación, frente a los alcances jurisprudenciales de la sentencia c-355/2006
Cargando...
Fecha
2019
Autores
Estupiñan Arteaga, Laura Cristina
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente artículo de investigación se centró en realizar un análisis de los alcances y perspectivas que tienen los abogados en formación respecto de la Sentencia C-355 de 2006, la cual es la encargada de despenalizar el aborto en tres hipótesis para el Estado Colombiano. El presente artículo tuvo un paradigma de investigación hermenéutico, un enfoque de investigación cualitativo. De igual manera, se planteó como objetivo general, analizar jurídicamente las apropiaciones y perspectivas de los estudiantes de Derecho de noveno semestre de la Universidad Simón Bolívar, frente a los alcances jurisprudenciales de la sentencia C-355 de 2006, y se tuvieron como objetivos específicos: primero, analizar mediante el derecho comparado, bajo qué fundamentos legales es permitido el aborto, para cual se realizó un análisis legal; segundo, explicar los argumentos legales por los cuales los estudiantes de noveno semestre de la Universidad Simón Bolívar, aceptan o rechazan el aborto, para lo cual se realizó una entrevista semiestructurada; y tercero, analizar jurisprudencialmente el desarrollo del aborto en el Derecho Colombiano. Para obtener resultados, se realizó un análisis jurisprudencial. Así las cosas, se tuvo como principales resultados: primero, alrededor del mundo existen legislaciones tanto permisivas como restrictivas; segundo, la sentencia C-355 de 2006 a través de sus tres hipótesis para despenalizar el aborto busca proteger los derechos de la mujer y tercero; la falta de apropiación de los abogados de formación acerca del tema del aborto.
This article in research focused on an analysis of the achievements and perspectives that you have lawyers in respect of the judgment C-355 of 2006 training, which is in charge of legalizing abortion in three hypotheses for the Colombian State. This article had a hermeneutical paradigm of research, a qualitative research approach. In the same way, was raised as a general objective, legally analyze the appropriations and prospects for law students of ninth semester of the Simón Bolívar University, opposite the jurisprudence scope of the decision C-355 of 2006, and is they had specific objectives: first, analyze by means of comparative law, under what legal basis is permitted abortion, which was a legal analysis; Second, explain the legal arguments by which students of ninth semester of the Universidad Simón Bolívar, accept or reject abortion, which was a semi-structured interview; and third, analyze the development of the Colombian law abortion jurisprudence. For results, a jurisprudential analysis was performed. So, had as main results: first, around the world there are laws both permissive and restrictive; Second, the decision C-355 of 2006 through its three hypotheses to decriminalize abortion seeks to protect the rights of women and third; the lack of appropriation of advocates of training on the subject of abortion.
This article in research focused on an analysis of the achievements and perspectives that you have lawyers in respect of the judgment C-355 of 2006 training, which is in charge of legalizing abortion in three hypotheses for the Colombian State. This article had a hermeneutical paradigm of research, a qualitative research approach. In the same way, was raised as a general objective, legally analyze the appropriations and prospects for law students of ninth semester of the Simón Bolívar University, opposite the jurisprudence scope of the decision C-355 of 2006, and is they had specific objectives: first, analyze by means of comparative law, under what legal basis is permitted abortion, which was a legal analysis; Second, explain the legal arguments by which students of ninth semester of the Universidad Simón Bolívar, accept or reject abortion, which was a semi-structured interview; and third, analyze the development of the Colombian law abortion jurisprudence. For results, a jurisprudential analysis was performed. So, had as main results: first, around the world there are laws both permissive and restrictive; Second, the decision C-355 of 2006 through its three hypotheses to decriminalize abortion seeks to protect the rights of women and third; the lack of appropriation of advocates of training on the subject of abortion.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Aborto, Derechos de la mujer, Derechos Humanos, Derechos del niño, Abortion, Women's Rights, Human Rights, Rights of the Child, Right to Life