Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseLicencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.contributor.authorLigardo-Herrera, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Navarro, Tomás
dc.contributor.authorInigo, Edurne A.
dc.contributor.authorBlok, Vincent
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-28T20:33:13Z
dc.date.available2018-06-28T20:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.issn20711050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/2157
dc.description.abstractResponsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has only lately included environmental sustainability as a key area for the social desirability of research and innovation. That is one of the reasons why just a few RRI projects and proposals include environmental sustainability, and Climate Change (CC) in particular. CC is one of the grand challenges of our time and, thus, this paper contributes to the operationalization of CC prevention in RRI. To this end, the tools employed against CC were identified. Tools originated in corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation which help to operationalize strategies against CC in RRI practice. Complementarily, the latest proposals by RRI projects and actors related to CC were reviewed. The findings of the document analysis and the web review were arranged in a framework intended for research and innovation that has an indirect but relevant negative impact due to CC. Thus, four main strategies for CC prevention in RRI were determined: a voluntary integration of the aims, a life cycle perspective, open access databases and key performance indicators, and stakeholder management. The article is finished acknowledging diverse barriers hindering the operationalization of CC prevention in RRI, and we introduce future avenues for research in this area.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherMDPI Open Access Publishingspa
dc.sourceSustainabilityeng
dc.sourceVol. 10, No.6 (2018)spa
dc.source.urihttp://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2012spa
dc.subjectResponsible research and innovationeng
dc.subjectClimate changeeng
dc.subjectSustainable innovationeng
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibilityeng
dc.titleAddressing Climate Change in Responsible Research and Innovation: Recommendations for Its Operationalizationeng
dc.typearticleeng
dcterms.referencesUnited Nations. Paris Agreement; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 21932.eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press and United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1987.eng
dcterms.referencesUnited Nations. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1997; p. 37.eng
dcterms.referencesEllerman, A.D.; Buchner, B.K. The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2007, 1, 66–87.eng
dcterms.referencesUnited Nations. Paris Agreement Entry into Force; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesEuropean Commission. ICT Footprint. Final Report. Pilot Testing on Methodologies for Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of the ICT-Sector; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.eng
dcterms.referencesHilbeck, A.; Binimelis, R.; Defarge, N.; Steinbrecher, R.; Székács, A.; Wickson, F.; Antoniou, M.; Bereano, P.L.; Clark, E.A.; Hansen, M.; et al. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2015, 27, 1–6.eng
dcterms.referencesBrookes, G.; Barfoot, P. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops Food 2015, 6, 103–133.eng
dcterms.referencesLubberink, R.; Blok, V.; van Ophem, J.; Omta, O. Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices. Sustainability 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesVon Schomberg, R. A vision of responsible research and innovation. In Responsible Innovation; JohnWiley: London, UK, 2013.eng
dcterms.referencesOwen, R.; Macnaghten, P.; Stilgoe, J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Sci. Public Policy 2012, 39, 751–760.eng
dcterms.referencesStilgoe, J.; Owen, R.; Macnaghten, P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 2013, 42, 1568–1580.eng
dcterms.referencesStrand, R.; Spaapen, J.; Bauer, M.W.; Hogan, E.; Revuelta, G.; Stagl, S.; Paula, L.; Guimarães Pereira, Â. Indicators for Promoting and Monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation Report from the Expert Group on Policy Indicators; European Union Publications: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.eng
dcterms.referencesKettner, C.; Köppl, A.; Stagl, S. Towards an Operational Measurement of Socio-Ecological Performance; WIFO Working Paper No 52; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.eng
dcterms.referencesGladwin, T.N.; Kennelly, J.J.; Krause, T.-S. Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 874–907.eng
dcterms.referencesSearcy, C. Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 107, 239–253.eng
dcterms.referencesChatterji, A.K.; Levine, D.I.; Toffel, M.W. HowWell Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 2009, 18, 125–169.eng
dcterms.referencesThe International Standardization Organization (ISO). ISO 26000. Guía de Responsabilidad Social (Official Translation); ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.eng
dcterms.referencesFernández, A.; Cunha, J.; Ferreira, P.; Araújo, M.; Ares Goméz, E.; Goméz, E.A. Research and development project assessment and social impact. Production 2015, 25, 725–738.eng
dcterms.referencesKarner, S.; Bajmocy, S.; Deblonde, M.; Balázs, B.; Laes, E.; Pataki, G.; Racovita, M.; Thaler, A.; Snick, A.; Wicher, M. RRI Concepts, Practices, Barriers and Potential Levers. Deliverable D1.1. Project FoTRRIS; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.eng
dcterms.referencesMirvis, P.; Herrera, M.E.B.; Googins, B.; Albareda, L. Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5014–5021.eng
dcterms.referencesAdams, R.; Jeanrenaud, S.; Bessant, J.; Denyer, D.; Overy, P. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2016, 18, 180–205.eng
dcterms.referencesHart, S.; Dowell, G. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1464–1479.eng
dcterms.referencesHansen, E.G.; Grosse-Dunker, F.; Reichwald, R. Sustainability Innovation Cube—A Framework to Evaluate Sustainability-Oriented Innovations. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2009, 13, 683–713.eng
dcterms.referencesLubberink, R.; Blok, V.; van Ophem, J.; Omta, O. A Framework for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: Lessons from Responsible-, Social- and Sustainable Innovation. In Responsible Innovation 3; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 181–207, ISBN 978-3-319-64833-0.eng
dcterms.referencesBrezet, H.; van Hemel, C. Ecodesign. A Promising Approach; United Nations Publications: Paris, France, 1997.eng
dcterms.referencesMatos, S.; Hall, J. Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 1083–1102.eng
dcterms.referencesBakker, C.A.;Wever, R.; Teoh, C.; Clercq, S. De Designing cradle-to-cradle products: A reality check. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2010, 3, 2–8.eng
dcterms.referencesBowen, G.A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual. Res. J. 2009, 9, 27–40.eng
dcterms.referencesBurget, M.; Bardone, E.; Pedaste, M. Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2016, 1–19.eng
dcterms.referencesKlewitz, J.; Hansen, E.G. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 57–75.eng
dcterms.referencesNiels Mejlgaard. Deliverable 2.2: State of the Art Review. Project Heirri; Niels Mejlgaard: Barcelona, Spain, 2015.eng
dcterms.referencesGiven, L. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; ISBN 9781412941631.spa
dcterms.referencesAtkinson, R.; Flint, J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Soc. Res. Update 2001, 33, 1–4.spa
dcterms.referencesCohen, N.; Arieli, T. Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. J. Peace Res. 2011, 48, 423–435.eng
dcterms.referencesVogt,W.P. Dictionary of Statistics and Mathodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Seiences, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-0-7619-8855-7.spa
dcterms.referencesRes-AGorA Project Res-AGorA. Available online: http://res-agora.eu/news/ (accessed on 27 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesNiels Mejlgaard. Deliverable 2.3 HEIRRI Database. Project Heirri; Niels Mejlgaard: Barcelona, Spain, 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesNwafor, C.; Jarmai, K.; Stacherl, B.; Montevecchi, F. Deliverable 1.4 Benchmark Report & Policy Paper: “Integration of the RRI Approach into Collaborative R&D&I and SME Participation in European Funded Collaborative Research in Healthcare, Nanotechnology and ICT”; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesVermeulen, S.; Klaassen, P.; Rijnen, M.; Arentshorst, M. Document ID: D3.3 Part of/D4.1 Part of. Tranining Showcase: Knowledge for Climate. Deliveravle; Project RRI Tools: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesIatridis, K.; Schroeder, D. Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry: The Case for Corporate Responsibility Tools; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-21692-8.eng
dcterms.referencesHemphill, T.A. Responsible Innovation in Industry: A Cautionary Note on Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Responsib. Innov. 2016, 9460, 1–14.eng
dcterms.referencesGianni, R. Responsibility and Freedom: The Ethical Realm of RRI;Wiley-ISTE: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 2, ISBN 978-1-84821-897-0.eng
dcterms.referencesVinnova Vinnova Funded Projects. Available online: https://www.vinnova.se/en/horizon-2020/ (accessed on 6 April 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesEuropean Commission. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.eng
dcterms.referencesCASI2020 Project CASI2020. Available online: http://www.casi2020.eu/ (accessed on 1 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesCOMPASS Project COMPASS. Available online: https://innovation-compass.eu/ (accessed on 27 April 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesEngage2020 Project Engage2020. Available online: http://engage2020.eu/ (accessed on 22 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesRRI-Tools Project RRI-Tools. Available online: https://www.rri-tools.eu/ (accessed on 23 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesSMART Project SMART. Available online: http://www.smart.uio.no/ (accessed on 1 April 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesBlok, V.; Lemmens, P. The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In Responsible Innovation 2; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 19–35.eng
dcterms.referencesMejlgaard, N.; Bloch, C.; Dedn, L.; Ravn, T.; Nielsen, M.W. Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS) Final Synthesis Report; European Commission DG Research and Innovation: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.eng
dcterms.referencesRes-AGorA_MoRRI Project Res-AGorA_MoRRI. Available online: http://www.technopolis-group.com/ morri/ (accessed on 24 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesNERRI Project NERRI. Available online: http://www.cienciaviva.pt/projinternacionais/nerri/index.asp (accessed on 24 March 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesRESPONSIBILITY Project RESPONSIBILITY. Available online: http://responsibility-rri.eu/the-project/ overview/ (accessed on 1 April 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesSTARBIOS2 Project STARBIOS2. Available online: https://starbios2.eu/ (accessed on 1 April 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesSchroeder, D. Case Study Descriptions. Deliverable 1.3. COMPASS Project; Responsible Innovation Compass: Vienna, Austria, 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesIordanou, K. Interview Synthesis Report: “Success Factors and Barriers for Mainstreaming RRI in SMEs”. Deliverable 1.2. Project COMOPASS; Responsible Innovation Compass: Vienna, Austria, 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesThorstensen, E.; Forsberg, E.-M. Social Life Cycle Assessment as a resource for Responsible Research and Innovation. J. Responsib. Innov. 2016, 9460, 1–39.eng
dcterms.referencesWender, B.A.; Foley, R.W.; Hottle, T.A.; Sadowski, J.; Prado-Lopez, V.; Eisenberg, D.A.; Laurin, L.; Seager, T.P. Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation. J. Responsib. Innov. 2014, 1, 200–207.eng
dcterms.referencesOwen, R.; Goldberg, N. Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Anal. 2010, 30, 1699–1707.eng
dcterms.referencesThe British Standards Institution (BSI). Publicly Available Specification PAS 2050: 2011 Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services; BSI: London, UK, 2011.eng
dcterms.referencesInternational Standardization Organization (ISO). ISO 14064. Greenhouse gases—Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. In Water, Air, & Soil Pollution; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009.eng
dcterms.referencesThe British Standards Institution (BSI). Guide to PAS 2050—How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of Goods and Services; BSI: London, UK, 2008; Volume 58.eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard. In Septiembre 2011;World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 1–148.eng
dcterms.referencesThe International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO 14040:2006(E) Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework; British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2006; Volume 2006.eng
dcterms.referencesGómez-Navarro, T.; Ligardo-Herrera, I. Assessing the Responsibility towards Climate Change of Research Projects By Means of Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Proceedings of the XIV International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, London, UK, 7 August 2016; pp. 1–2.eng
dcterms.referencesMcAloone, T.C.; Hare, J.O. Eco-Innovation in Small to Medium Sized Enterprises: Needs and Opportunities for Action. Available online: http://www.ecodesign.dtu.dk//-/media/Sites/ecodesign/2014version/Ecoinnovation- working-paper.ashx (accessed on 13 June 2018).eng
dcterms.referencesCapuz-Rizo, S.; Gómez-Navarro, T. Ecodiseño: Ingeniería del Ciclo de Vida Para el Desarrollo de Productos Sostenibles; Universitat Politècnica de València: Valencia, Spain, 2002; ISBN 9788497051910.spa
dcterms.referencesSzabo, D.G. Fueling Life-Cycle Assessment: Lessons from the Life-Cycle Assessment of Transport Fuels. In Proceedings of the SMART Conference “Life-Cycle Based Management and Reporting for Sustainable Business”, Oslo, Norway, 29–30 November 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesEngelhard, M.; Coles, D.; Weckert, J.; Lingner, S. Case Studies—Overview of Ethical Acceptability and Sustainability (5.1); Deliverable 5.1. ProGReSS (PROmoting Global REsponsible Research and Social and Scientific Innovation); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014; pp. 1–45.eng
dcterms.referencesMitkidis, K. Life-cycle based climate regulation through supply chain contracts. In Proceedings of the SMART Conference ‘Life-Cycle Based Management and Reporting for Sustainable Business’, Oslo, Norway, 29–30 November 2016.eng
dcterms.referencesGuinée, J.B.; Heijungs, R.; Huppes, G.; Zamagni, A.; Masoni, P.; Buonamici, R.; Ekvall, T.; Rydberg, T. Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 90–96.eng
dcterms.referencesInstitute for Environment and Sustainability (ECJRC). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed Guidance; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010; ISBN 978-92-79-19092-6.eng
dcterms.referencesInternational EPD®System Environmental Product Declaration. Database. Available online: https://www. environdec.com/ (accessed on 14 November 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesIbáñez-Forés, V.; Pacheco-Blanco, B.; Capuz-Rizo, S.F.; Bovea, M.D. Environmental Product Declarations: Exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 116, 157–169.eng
dcterms.referencesEuropean, C. European Reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD). Available online: http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa. eu/ELCD3/ (accessed on 20 September 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesFlipse, S.M.; van der Sanden, M.C.A.; Osseweijer, P. Improving industrial R&D practices with social and ethical aspects: Aligning key performance indicators with social and ethical aspects in food technology R&D. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 85, 185–197.eng
dcterms.referencesKettner, C.; Kletzan-Slamanig, D.; Köppl, A.; Köberl, K. Indicators for Sustainable Energy Development—The PASHMINA Approach—PASHMINA Project; WIFO Studies: Wien, Austria, 2012.eng
dcterms.referencesAccountAbility. AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard 2015; AccountAbility: Zurich, Switzerland, 2015; p. 40.eng
dcterms.referencesHammond, G.P.; Jones, C.I. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2008, 161, 87–98.eng
dcterms.referencesGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI). GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database. Available online: http://database. globalreporting.org/ (accessed on 10 November 2017).eng
dcterms.referencesEggleston, H.S.; Buendia, L.; Miwa, K.; Ngara, T.K.T.; Eggleston, H.S.; Buendia, L.; Miwa, K.; Ngara, T.; Tanabe, K. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan, 2006.eng
dcterms.referencesDeblonde, M. Responsible research and innovation: Building knowledge arenas for glocal sustainability research. J. Responsib. Innov. 2015, 2, 20–38.eng
dcterms.referencesParedes-Frigolett, H. Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 110, 126–133.eng
dcterms.referencesBierwirth, A.; Cavallaro, F.; Chennells, R.; Schroeder, D. Deliverable 4.3: Recommendations from Industry and End—Users for RRI. Report for FP7 Project “ProGReSS”; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.eng
dcterms.referencesKhan, S.S.; Timotijevic, L.; Newton, R.; Coutinho, D.; Llerena, J.L.; Ortega, S.; Benighaus, L.; Hofmaier, C.; Xhaferri, Z.; de Boer, A.; et al. The framing of innovation among European research funding actors: Assessing the potential for “responsible research and innovation” in the food and health domain. Food Policy 2016, 62, 78–87.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos científicos evaluados por pares

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem