La caducidad de la reparación directa en delitos de lesa humanidad y crímenes de guerra de conformidad con la sentencia SU-312/ 2020 Corte Constitucional, sentencia de unificación 61033/2020 del consejo de estado y la aplicabilidad del control de convencionalidad
Cargando...
Fecha
2023
Autores
Angarita Toloza, Grace Oksana Viviana
Mogollon Mora, Yohana Alexandra
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
En el presente artículo se desarrolló el estudio de las sentencias SU -312 de 2020 de fecha 13 de enero de 2020 de la Corte Constitucional y la sentencia jurisprudencial Radicado interno No. 61.033 de fecha 29 de enero de 2020 del Consejo de Estado en las cuales se fijaron reglas para el cómputo de la caducidad del medio de control de reparación directa por delitos de lesa humanidad y crímenes de guerra cuando la responsabilidad es imputable a agentes del estado, reglas que como se determinará desconoce la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en sentencia Almonacid Arellano y otros contra chile del 26 de septiembre de 2006 en la cual se establece que en el caso de las víctimas de delito de lesa humanidad y crímenes de guerra la imprescriptibilidad de la acción penal debe ser extendida a todas las acciones civiles, administrativas con el fin de garantizar el derecho a una tutela judicial efectiva, de verdad, justicia y reparación y la aplicación del control de convencionalidad de manera vinculante a los estados partes.
In this article I develop the study of the sentences SU -312 of 2020 dated January 13, 2020 of the Constitutional Court and the jurisprudential sentence internal Radicand No. 61. 033 dated January 29, 2020 of the Council of State in which rules were established for the computation of the expiration of the expiration of the means of control of direct reparation for crimes against humanity and war crimes when the responsibility is attributable to agents of the state, These rules, as will be determined, do not comply with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the judgment Almonacid Arellano et al. v. Chile of September 26, 2006, which establishes that in the case of victims of crimes against humanity and war crimes the imprescriptibly of the criminal action should be extended to all civil and administrative actions in order to guarantee the right to effective judicial protection, truth, justice and reparation and the application of the control of conventionality in a binding manner to the states parties
In this article I develop the study of the sentences SU -312 of 2020 dated January 13, 2020 of the Constitutional Court and the jurisprudential sentence internal Radicand No. 61. 033 dated January 29, 2020 of the Council of State in which rules were established for the computation of the expiration of the expiration of the means of control of direct reparation for crimes against humanity and war crimes when the responsibility is attributable to agents of the state, These rules, as will be determined, do not comply with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the judgment Almonacid Arellano et al. v. Chile of September 26, 2006, which establishes that in the case of victims of crimes against humanity and war crimes the imprescriptibly of the criminal action should be extended to all civil and administrative actions in order to guarantee the right to effective judicial protection, truth, justice and reparation and the application of the control of conventionality in a binding manner to the states parties
Descripción
Palabras clave
Caducidad, Control de Convencionalidad, Imprescriptibilidad, Delitos de lesa humanidad, Reparación integral, Expiration, Conventionality control, Imprescriptibility, Crimes against humanity, Integral reparation