Validación de modelos de SCORE para el pronóstico de sepsis en pacientes obstétricas y sus desenlaces neonatales: estudio prospectivo multicéntrico en Colombia

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.contributor.advisorRojas Suarez, José Antonio
dc.contributor.advisorDueñas, Carmelo Rafael
dc.contributor.authorCifuentes Trujillo, Sofia
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-11T15:40:17Z
dc.date.available2025-07-11T15:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La sepsis obstétrica continúa siendo una causa importante de morbilidad y mortalidad materna a nivel global, con mayor impacto en contextos de baja y mediana renta. La detección precoz de desenlaces graves en estas pacientes sigue siendo un desafío clínico, especialmente ante la ausencia de herramientas diagnósticas validadas en poblaciones gestantes. Este estudio evalúa el rendimiento de distintas escalas clínicas para predecir desenlaces maternos y neonatales graves. Objetivo: Validar y comparar el desempeño diagnóstico de las escalas SOFA, omSOFA, qSOFA, SIRS y OEWS para la predicción de disfunción orgánica y desenlaces maternos graves (SMO). en pacientes obstétricas con infección en Colombia. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo multicéntrico realizado en 12 centros hospitalarios de tercer nivel. Se incluyeron 2.198 pacientes obstétricas con infección presunta o confirmada. Se calcularon métricas diagnósticas (sensibilidad, especificidad, AUC, odds ratio diagnóstico). para cada escala, y se evaluaron asociaciones con desenlaces clínicos maternos y neonatales. Resultados: La escala SOFA ≥ 2 obtuvo el mejor rendimiento global (AUC: 0,692; DOR: 31,1), seguida por omSOFA (AUC: 0,663; DOR: 21,7). La puntuación qSOFA ≥ 2 mostró alta especificidad (97,2 %). pero sensibilidad limitada (14,9 %). La escala OEWS en su umbral medio/alto presentó equilibrio aceptable entre sensibilidad (47,3 %). y especificidad (89,9 %). El SMO ocurrió en el 6,73 % de las pacientes, con una fuerte asociación con valores elevados de SOFA, omSOFA y OEWS. Conclusión: SOFA y omSOFA demostraron ser las herramientas más precisas para la identificación precoz de pacientes obstétricas con alto riesgo de desenlaces graves. La integración de estas escalas en protocolos clínicos puede optimizar la respuesta frente a la sepsis obstétrica. OEWS representa una opción útil para vigilancia continua, mientras que qSOFA no debe utilizarse de forma aislada en esta población.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Obstetric sepsis remains a major contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Early identification of patients at risk of severe outcomes is hindered by the lack of validated diagnostic tools adapted to pregnancy. This study evaluates the performance of several clinical scoreing systems in predicting severe maternal and neonatal outcomes. Objective: To validate and compare the diagnostic performance of SOFA, omSOFA, qSOFA, SIRS, and OEWS scores in predicting organ dysfunction and severe maternal outcomes (SMO). in obstetric patients with infection in Colombia. Methods: A prospective multicenter observational study was conducted across 12 tertiary hospitals. A total of 2,198 pregnant or postpartum women with suspected or confirmed infections were included. Diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC, diagnostic odds ratio). were calculated for each score, and associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Results: SOFA ≥ 2 showed the highest overall performance (AUC: 0.692; DOR: 31.1), followed by omSOFA (AUC: 0.663; DOR: 21.7). qSOFA ≥ 2 demonstrated high specificity (97.2%). but low sensitivity (14.9%). OEWS at medium/high threshold provided a balanced profile (sensitivity: 47.3%; specificity: 89.9%). Severe maternal outcomes occurred in 6.73% of patients and were strongly associated with elevated SOFA, omSOFA, and OEWS scores. Neonatal adverse outcomes were also more frequent among cases with maternal dysfunction. Conclusion: SOFA and omSOFA are the most accurate tools for early identification of obstetric patients at risk of severe outcomes. Their integration into clinical sepsis protocols may improve maternal care and survival. OEWS can support continuous monitoring in non-critical settings, while qSOFA should not be used as a standalone screening tool in obstetric populations.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16825
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationaleng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectSepsis obstétricaspa
dc.subjectMorbilidad materna gravespa
dc.subjectEscalas de gravedad clínicaspa
dc.subjectSOFAspa
dc.subjectomSOFAspa
dc.subjectSistema de alerta temprana obstétrica (OEWS)spa
dc.subjectDesenlace materno-neonatal.spa
dc.subject.keywordsObstetric sepsiseng
dc.subject.keywordsSevere maternal morbidityeng
dc.subject.keywordsClinical severity scoreseng
dc.subject.keywordsSOFAeng
dc.subject.keywordsomSOFAeng
dc.subject.keywordsObstetric Early Warning Score (OEWS)eng
dc.subject.keywordsMaternal and neonatal outcomeseng
dc.titleValidación de modelos de SCORE para el pronóstico de sepsis en pacientes obstétricas y sus desenlaces neonatales: estudio prospectivo multicéntrico en Colombiaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.spaOtros
dcterms.referencesUnited Nations D of E and SA. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special edition [Internet]. New York; 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 26]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/eng
dcterms.referencesZeeman GG. Obstetric critical care: A blueprint for improved outcomes. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2006 Sep [cited 2025 May 11];34(SUPPL. 9). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16917425/eng
dcterms.referencesMhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, Naughton NN. A series of anesthesia-related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2007 Jun [cited 2025 May 11];106(6):1096–104. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17525583/eng
dcterms.referencesBauer ME, Bauer ST, Rajala B, MacEachern MP, Polley LS, Childers D, et al. Maternal physiologic parameters in relationship to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 2025 May 11];124(3):535–41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25162253/eng
dcterms.referencesHuang W, Yang P, Xu F, Chen D. Predictive value of qSOFA score for death in emergency department resuscitation room among adult trauma patients:a retrospective study. BMC Emerg Med [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2025 May 11];21(1):2–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34507543/eng
dcterms.referencesCarle C, Alexander P, Columb M, Johal J. Design and internal validation of an obstetric early warning score: Secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2013 Apr [cited 2025 May 11];68(4):354–67. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23488833/eng
dcterms.referencesAoyama K, D’Souza R, Pinto R, Ray JG, Hill A, Scales DC, et al. Risk prediction models for maternal mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 Dec 4 [cited 2025 May 11];13(12):e0208563. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30513118/eng
dcterms.referencesKnight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Jayakody H, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, et al. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014-16. [Internet]. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014–16. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit: University of Oxford; 2018 [cited 2025 May 11]. 61–69 p. Available from: https://research.birmingham.ac.uk/en/publications/saving-lives-improving-motherscare-lessons-learned-to-inform-mateng
dcterms.referencesDondorp AM, Dünser MW, Schultz MJ. Sepsis management in resource-limited settings. Sepsis Management in Resource-limited Settings [Internet]. 2019 Feb 8 [cited 2025 May 11];1–216. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32091674/eng
dcterms.referencesMwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CRJC. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: A systematic review. Lancet [Internet]. 2012 Feb 4 [cited 2025 May 11];379(9814):445–52. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullText?pii=S0140673611615778eng
dcterms.referencesMain EK, Abreo A, McNulty J, Gilbert W, McNally C, Poeltler D, et al. Measuring severe maternal morbidity: Validation of potential measures. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016 May 1 [cited 2025 May 11];214(5):643.e1-643.e10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26582168/eng
dcterms.referencesSay L, Pattinson RC, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: The prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss). Reprod Health [Internet]. 2004 Aug 17 [cited 2025 May 11];1(1):6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15357863/eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020. [Internet]. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2023 [cited 2025 May 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077006eng
dcterms.referencesEscobar MF, Echavarría MP, Zambrano MA, Ramos I, Kusanovic JP. Maternal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM [Internet]. 2020 Aug 1 [cited 2025 May 11];2(3):100110. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33345880/eng
dcterms.referencesBauer ME, Bateman BT, Bauer ST, Shanks AM, Mhyre JM. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: Temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2025 May 12];117(4):944–50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24023020/eng
dcterms.referencesBlanco Esquivel LA, Urbina JM, Zerón HM. Approach to an obstetric prognosis scale: The modified SOFA scale. Ghana Med J [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2025 May 11];50(3):129. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5044792/eng
dcterms.referencesBauer ME, Albright C, Prabhu M, Heine RP, Lennox C, Allen C, et al. Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health: Consensus Bundle on Sepsis in Obstetric Care. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2023 Sep 1 [cited 2025 May 11];142(3):481–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37590980/eng
dcterms.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Salud de Bogotá (Departamento de Epidemiología SB. Análisis de situación de salud: Colombia 2024 [Internet]. Secretaría Distrital de Salud de Bogotá. 2024 [cited 2025 May 11]. Available from: www.minsalud.gov.cospa
dcterms.referencesBonet M, Nogueira Pileggi V, Rijken MJ, Coomarasamy A, Lissauer D, Souza JP, et al. Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2017 May 30 [cited 2025 May 11];14(1):67. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28558733/eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. World health statistics 2023: monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2023 May 19 [cited 2025 May 11];1–119. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074323eng
dcterms.referencesGrissom CK, Brown SM, Kuttler KG, Boltax JP, Jones J, Jephson AR, et al. A modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for critical care triage. Disaster Med Public Health Prep [Internet]. 2010 Dec [cited 2025 May 11];4(4):277–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21149228/eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization UNCF (UNICEF), UNPF (UNFPA), WBGUNPD. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2023: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240079328eng
dcterms.referencesDellinger RP, Levy M, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 May 12];41(2):580– 637. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23353941/eng
dcterms.referencesAcosta CD, Bhattacharya S, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Maternal sepsis: A Scottish population-based case-control study. BJOG [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2025 May 12];119(4):474–83. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22251396/eng
dcterms.referencesAlbright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, Rouse DJ, Anderson BL. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: A model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Jul 1 [cited 2025 May 12];211(1):39.e1-e8. Available from: https://www.ajog.org/action/showFullText?pii=S0002937814002154eng
dcterms.referencesMor G, Cardenas I. The Immune System in Pregnancy: A Unique Complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol [Internet]. 2010 Jun 1 [cited 2025 May 12];63(6):425–33. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00836.xeng
dcterms.referencesSacks GP, Studena K, Sargent IL, Redman CWG. Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2025 May 12];179(1):80–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9704769/eng
dcterms.referencesHotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: From cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol [Internet]. 2013 Dec [cited 2025 May 12];13(12):862–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24232462/eng
dcterms.referencesBoomer JS, To K, Chang KC, Takasu O, Osborne DF, Walton AH, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA [Internet]. 2011 Dec 21 [cited 2025 May 12];306(23):2594–605. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22187279/eng
dcterms.referencesAngus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 Aug 29 [cited 2025 May 12];369(9):840–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23984731/eng
dcterms.referencesVincent JL, De Mendonça A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: Results of a multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2025 May 12];26(11):1793–800. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9824069/eng
dcterms.referencesAcosta CD, Kurinczuk JJ, Lucas DN, Tuffnell DJ, Sellers S, Knight M. Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: a national case-control study. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 May 12];11(7):e1001672. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25003759/eng
dcterms.referencesAngus DC, Seymour CW, Coopersmith CM, Deutschman CS, Klompas M, Levy MM, et al. A Framework for the Development and Interpretation of Different Sepsis Definitions and Clinical Criteria. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2016 Mar 1 [cited 2025 May 12];44(3):e113–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26901559/eng
dcterms.referencesLewis G. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG [Internet]. 2011 Mar [cited 2025 May 12];118 Suppl 1(s1):1–203. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21356004/eng
dcterms.referencesSay L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 May 12];2(6):e323-333. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25103301/eng
dcterms.referencesFilippi V, Chou D, Ronsmans C, Graham W, Say L. Levels and Causes of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. In: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 2): Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health [Internet]. Washington (DC): The World Bank: The World Bank; 2016 [cited 2025 May 12]. p. 51–70. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27227230/eng
dcterms.referencesBonet M, Brizuela V, Abalos E, Cuesta C, Baguiya A, Chamillard M, et al. Frequency and management of maternal infection in health facilities in 52 countries (GLOSS): a 1-week inception cohort study. Lancet Glob Health [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2025 May 12];8(5):e661–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32353314/eng
dcterms.referencesSay L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: Examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ [Internet]. 2007 Oct [cited 2025 May 12];85(10):812–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18038064/eng
dcterms.referencesKassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet [Internet]. 2014 Sep 22 [cited 2025 May 12];384(9947):980–1004. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24797575/eng
dcterms.referencesCamacho-Hübner AV. Mortalidad Materna en América Latina y el Caribe: situación, desafíos y recomendaciones [Internet]. UNFPA/LACRO. 2022 Apr [cited 2024 Apr 15]. Available from: https://parlatino.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/mortalidadmaterna-alc.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesFoeller ME, Gibbs RS. Maternal sepsis: New concepts, new practices. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2019 Apr 1 [cited 2025 May 12];31(2):90–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30789841/eng
dcterms.referencesSingh A, Guleria K, Vaid NB, Jain S. Evaluation of maternal early obstetric warning system (MEOWS chart) as a predictor of obstetric morbidity: a prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 27];207:11–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.014eng
dcterms.referencesGoldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S. Improving pregnancy outcomes in lowand middle-income countries. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2018 Jun 22 [cited 2025 May 12];15(Suppl 1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29945628/eng
dcterms.referencesFleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, et al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2020 Aug 1 [cited 2025 May 12];46(8):1552–62. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32572531/eng
dcterms.referencesGibbs R, Bauer M, Olvera L. Improving diagnosis and treatment of maternal sepsis: a CMQCC quality improvement toolkit [Internet]. Stanford (CA): California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative; 2020 Jun [cited 2025 Jun 27]. Available from: https://www.cmqcc.orgeng
dcterms.referencesUnited Nations. General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [Internet]. New York: UN: UN,; 2015 Oct [cited 2025 May 12]. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3923923eng
dcterms.referencesHerrera Morales BE, Lara Cruz J, Ortega López V. Predictores de mortalidad en pacientes con sepsis obstétrica mediante uso de score de sepsis obstétrica y evaluación secuencial de falla orgánica-obstétrica. Medicina Crítica. 2018;32(5):265–72. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448- 89092018000500265spa
dcterms.referencesBakhtawar S, Sheikh S, Qureshi R, Hoodbhoy Z, Payne B, Azam I, et al. Risk factors for postpartum sepsis: A nested case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 May 14 [cited 2025 Jun 27];20(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32410594/eng
dcterms.referencesAgarwal R, Goyal P, Mohta M, Kar R. Comparison of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) in Women with Pregnancy-Associated Sepsis with Respect to Critical Care Admission and Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2021 Feb 1;71(1):45–51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33814798/eng
dcterms.referencesChampagne HA, Garabedian MJ. Routine Screening for Sepsis in an Obstetric Population: Evaluation of an Improvement Project. Permanente Journal [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jun 27];24(5). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33482959/eng
dcterms.referencesThakur R, Naga Rohith V, Arora JK. Mean SOFA Score in Comparison With APACHE II Score in Predicting Mortality in Surgical Patients With Sepsis. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 Mar 25 [cited 2025 Jun 27]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37113362/eng
dcterms.referencesAgarwal R, Yadav RK, Mohta M, Sikka M, Radhakrishnan G. Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) utility and validation for triaging patients with obstetric sepsis in the emergency department: Evidence from a low income health care setting. Obstet Med [Internet]. 2019 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Jun 27];12(2):90–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38263076/eng
dcterms.referencesLi A, Ling L, Qin H, Arabi YM, Myatra SN, Egi M, et al. Prognostic evaluation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score in ICU patients with sepsis across different income settings. Crit Care. 2024 Dec 1;28(1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38263076/eng
dcterms.referencesDesai N, Gross J. Scoring systems in the critically ill: uses, cautions, and future directions. BJA Educ [Internet]. 2019 Jul 1 [cited 2025 May 11];19(7):212–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33456893/eng
dcterms.referencesDíaz-Aguilar FA, Casimiro-Pita MI, Mendez-Jesus IA, Martínez-Rodríguez PB, Cuéllar-Alcántar A, Sánchez-Franco B. Prevalencia de la morbilidad y mortalidad de los pacientes con sepsis en la unidad de terapia intensiva de un hospital de ginecología y obstetricia de tercer nivel. Arch Med Urg Mex [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 May 11];16(3):179–85. Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgibin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=119315spa
dcterms.referencesAbutheraa N, Grant J, Mullen AB. Sepsis scoring systems and use of the Sepsis six care bundle in maternity hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 1;21(1).eng
dcterms.referencesLemma K, Berhane Y. Early onset neonatal sepsis and its associatited factors: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 1;24(1):617. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39342103/eng
dcterms.referencesBauer ME, Perez SL, Main EK, Norman GS, Fish LJ, Caldwell MA, et al. Near-miss and maternal sepsis mortality: A qualitative study of survivors and support persons. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2024 Aug 1 [cited 2025 May 11];299:136–42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38865740/eng
dcterms.referencesAbutheraa N, Grant J, Mullen AB. Sepsis scoring systems and use of the Sepsis six care bundle in maternity hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 27];21(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34301187/eng
dcterms.referencesChimwaza Y, Hunt A, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Bonnett L, Abalos E, Cuesta C, et al. Early warning systems for identifying severe maternal outcomes: ndings from the WHO global maternal sepsis study [Internet]. 2024. Available from: www.thelancet.comeng
dcterms.referencesLiu W, Su J, Wang S. Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Dec 1;25(1):33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39819594/eng
dcterms.referencesXu Y, Zhu S, Song H, Lian X, Zeng M, He J, et al. Comparison of the efficacy for early warning systems in predicting obstetric critical illness. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2024 May 1;296:327–32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38520955/eng
dcterms.referencesLi C, Liu Y, Zhang W. Joint and Independent Associations of Gestational Weight Gain and Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index with Outcomes of Pregnancy in Chinese Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Mar 21];10(8):e0136850. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313941eng
dcterms.referencesBowyer L, Robinson HL, Barrett H, Crozier TM, Giles M, Idel I, et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the investigation and management sepsis in pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):540– 51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28670748/eng
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993: por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. [Internet]. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud de Colombia; 1993 [cited 2025 Jun 27]. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLU CION-8430-DE-1993.PDFspa
dcterms.referencesBian W, Li Y, Wang Y, Chang L, Deng L, Li Y, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition based on global leadership initiative in malnutrition criteria for completeness of diagnosis and future risk of malnutrition based on current malnutrition diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 10, Frontiers in Nutrition. Frontiers Media SA; 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37469547/eng
dcterms.referencesLiu B, Li D, Cheng Y, Yu J, Jia Y, Zhang Q, et al. Development and internal validation of a simple prognostic score for early sepsis risk stratification in the emergency department. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1 [cited 2025 May 11];11(7):e046009. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/7/e046009eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
sb.programaEspecialización en Medicina Crítica y Cuidados Intensivosspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF_RESUMEN.pdf
Tamaño:
310.61 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
1.45 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones