El exceso ritual manifiesto y la visión constitucional de la actividad judicial
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2016
Autores
Caicedo Villamizar, Alexander Enrique
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
La extensión del derecho procesal en nuestros tiempos ha sido reestructurada indudablemente por medio del constitucionalismo, puesto que ha rescatado las garantías centenariamente elaboradas, fundamentadas en el derecho procesal tradicional para vincularlas inescindiblemente a la realización de las normas sustanciales, de esta forma las han dotado de un fin y una perspectiva valorativa que no se manifiesta a partir de las solas formalidades o procedimientos preestablecidos, sino en relación directa con las normas jurídicas de orden constitucional y legal que consagran los efectos jurídicos que las partes pretenden. El presente artículo de reflexión es una investigación fundamentada en postulados constitucionales, normatividad, doctrina, precedente judicial y jurisprudencia con el fin de replantear la concepción del juez contemporáneo en el ejercicio del derecho, sustentado en teorías legalistas y excesos ritulismos tradicionales,a través de la innovación de una nueva visión constitucional en la administración de justicia colombiana, para que la labor del juez no pueda reducirse a una simple atribución mecánica de los postulados generales, impersonales y abstractos consagrados en la ley a casos concretos, pues se estarían desconociendo la complejidad y la singularidad de la realidad social, la cual no puede ser abarcada por completo dentro del ordenamiento positivo, sino a través de su quehacer judicial se logre efectivamente la protección de las garantías constitucionales y legales del ciudadano, quien en caso de no lograrlo por el exagerado apego a la forma por parte del juzgador, pueda acudir ante el fracaso de los medios ordinarios de impugnación, a la acción de tutela contra providencias judiciales cuando se haya incurrido en un defecto procedimental.
The spread of procedural law in our times has undoubtedly been restructured through constitutionalism, since it has recovered centenarian guarantees elaborated, based on procedural law traditional linked necessarily to the realiz.ation of the substantive rules, thus it has given them a teleology and an evaluative perspective that manifests just from the formalities or pre-established procedures, but in direct relation with the legal norms and constitutional order that enshrine the legal effects which the parties intend to. This article's reflection, is a research based on constitutional principies, regulations, doctrine and precedents, in order to rethink the design of the contemporary Court in the exercise of the right, supported by legalistic theories excesses traditional ritualism, through the assumption of a new constitutional vision in the administration ofC olombian justice, To ensure that the work of the judge cannot be reduced to a simple mechanical attribution of the general propositions, impersonal and abstract enshrined in the law to concrete cases, since it would be ignoring the complexity and uniqueness ofthe social reality, which cannot be covered entirely within the domestic positive, but that through its judicial activity is effectively achieved the protection of constitutional and legal guarantees of the citizen, who in the event of not to do so by the exaggerated attachment to the form by the judge, to go before the failure of the ordinary means of challenging , to the action guardianship against orders when it is incurred in a procedural defect
The spread of procedural law in our times has undoubtedly been restructured through constitutionalism, since it has recovered centenarian guarantees elaborated, based on procedural law traditional linked necessarily to the realiz.ation of the substantive rules, thus it has given them a teleology and an evaluative perspective that manifests just from the formalities or pre-established procedures, but in direct relation with the legal norms and constitutional order that enshrine the legal effects which the parties intend to. This article's reflection, is a research based on constitutional principies, regulations, doctrine and precedents, in order to rethink the design of the contemporary Court in the exercise of the right, supported by legalistic theories excesses traditional ritualism, through the assumption of a new constitutional vision in the administration ofC olombian justice, To ensure that the work of the judge cannot be reduced to a simple mechanical attribution of the general propositions, impersonal and abstract enshrined in the law to concrete cases, since it would be ignoring the complexity and uniqueness ofthe social reality, which cannot be covered entirely within the domestic positive, but that through its judicial activity is effectively achieved the protection of constitutional and legal guarantees of the citizen, who in the event of not to do so by the exaggerated attachment to the form by the judge, to go before the failure of the ordinary means of challenging , to the action guardianship against orders when it is incurred in a procedural defect
Descripción
Palabras clave
Debido proceso, Acción de tutela, Providencias judiciales, Exceso ritual manifiesto, Due Process, Action guardianship, Court order, Manifest excess ritual
