Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng
dc.contributor.authorPacheco Acosta, Héctor Luis
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T16:10:14Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T16:10:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the features of Kant’s view of memory, which Kant himself described explicitly in his lectures on anthropology and implicitly in the A edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. I shall offer a review of literature on Kant’s view of memory up to this day. I suggest that memory is a cognitive faculty that has the power to store and reproduce representations. Kant distinguishes among three different kinds of memorization which are relevant for human cognition. I offer reasons to hold that imagination and memory must be differentiated by their functioning, although the first one grounds the second one. Finally, I hold that certain functions of memory need to be presupposed at a transcendental level, in which memory would play a fundamental function with regard to the possibility of experienceeng
dc.description.abstractEste artículo analiza los rasgos de la concepción de la memoria de Kant, los cuales él describió explícitamente en sus lecciones sobre antropología e implícitamente en la edición A de la Crítica de la Razón Pura. Proporcionaré una revisión de la literatura sobre la concepción de Kant acerca de la memoria hasta el presente. Sugiero que la memoria es una facultad cognitiva que tiene el poder de almacenar y reproducir representaciones. Kant distingue tres tipos diferentes de memorización, los cuales son relevantes para el conocimiento humano. Asimismo, proporciono razones para sostener que la imaginación y la memoria deben ser diferenciadas por su funcionamiento, aunque la primera es el fundamento de la segunda. Finalmente, sostengo que ciertas funciones de la memoria necesitan ser presupuestas a un nivel trascendental, en el cual la memoria cumpliría una función fundamental con respecto a la posibilidad de la experiencia.spa
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.193
dc.identifier.issn20117477
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/6939
dc.identifier.urlhttp://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/11704
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Norte. Department of Humanities and Philosophyeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceEidos
dc.sourceNº 32 (2020)
dc.subjectKanteng
dc.subjectMemoriaspa
dc.subjectConocimientospa
dc.subjectImaginaciónspa
dc.subjectExperienciaspa
dc.subjectMemoryeng
dc.subjectCognitioneng
dc.subjectImaginationeng
dc.subjectExperienceeng
dc.titleKant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memoryeng
dc.title.translatedLas funciones empíricas y transcendentales de la memoria en Kantspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.spaArtículo científicospa
dcterms.referencesBader, R. M. (2017). Inner Sense and Time. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 124-137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesBaumgarten, A. G. (2013). Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes and Related Materials. C. D. Fugate and J. Hymers (ed. and trans.). London: New York. Bloomsbury. (First published 1739/41757/71779).eng
dcterms.referencesBennet, J. (1966). Kant’s Analytic. New York: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesBrandt, R. (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants “Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht” (1798), Kant-Forschungen 10. Berlin: F. Meiner Verlag.eng
dcterms.referencesBrandt, R. (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants “Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht” (1798), Kant-Forschungen 10. Berlin: F. Meiner Verlag.eng
dcterms.referencesBrook, A. (1994). Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesCaygill, H. (1995). A Kant Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cicero. (1967). De oratore. Books I, II (2 vols.). E. W. Sutton (trans.). London: William Heinemann LTD. Descartes, R. (1991). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. III, The correspondence. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch and A. Kenny (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesDietrich, H. (1991). Die Erfindung des Gedächtnisses. Frankfurt am Main: Keip.eng
dcterms.referencesEwing, A. C. (1967). A Short Commentary on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. Chicago: Chicago University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesFörster, E. (1993). Factual Notes. In E. Förster (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Opus Postumum (pp. 257-288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesGibbons, S. (1994). Kant’s Theory of Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesHanna, R. (2005). Kant and Nonconceptual Content. European Journal of Philosophy, 13, 247-290. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2005.00229.xeng
dcterms.referencesHeidegger, M. (1990). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. R. Taft (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesJoyce, R. (1997). Cartesian Memory. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(3), 375-393. Doi:10.1353/hph.1997.0046eng
dcterms.referencesKant, I. (2007a). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798). In R. B. Louden (Ed. and trans.), Anthropology History and Education (pp. 227-429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKant, I. (2007b). Lectures on Pedagogy (1803). In R. B. Louden (ed. and trans.), Anthropology History and Education (pp. 434-485). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKant, I. (1998 [1781/1787]). Critique of Pure Reason. In P. Guyer, and A. W. Wood (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKant, I. (1996). Critique of practical reason (1788). In M. J. Gregor (ed. and trans.). Practical Philosophy (pp. 133-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKant, I. (1900ff.). Kant‘s gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Ed.) (29 vols. to date). Berlin: G. Reimer [later W. de Gruyter].eng
dcterms.referencesKitcher, P. (1990). Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKrüger, J. G. (1756). Versuch einer Experimental-Seelenlehre. Halle & Helmstädt: C. H. Hemmerde.eng
dcterms.referencesLlewelyn, J. (2000). The Hypocritical Imagination: between Kant and Levinas. London and New York. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesLocke, J. (1959). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. A. Campbell Fraser (Ed.), Vol 1. New York: Dover.eng
dcterms.referencesMakkreel, R. (2014). Self-Cognition and Self-Assessment in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology (pp. 18-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesMatherne, S. (2015). Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception. Ergo, 2(29), 737-777. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.029eng
dcterms.referencesMcLear, C. (2017). Intuition and Presence. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 86-103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesMei, M. (2011). Notio intellectus divini quomodo prodeat. Eine Untersuchung über die gnoseologische Bedeutung unserer Gotteserkenntnis. In L. Kreimendahl, M. Muslow and & F. Vollhardt (Eds.), Aufklärung, Band 23: Die natürliche Theologie bei Christian Wolff (pp. 97-122). Hamburg:Felix Meiner Verlag.eng
dcterms.referencesNagel, G. (1983). The Structure of Experience: Kant’s System of Principles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.eng
dcterms.referencesNuzzo, A. (2015). Forms of Memory in Classical German Philosophy. In D. Nikulin (Ed.), Memory: A History (pp. 184-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesPaton, H. J. (1936). Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience: A Commentary on the first half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol I. United Kingdom: Allen & Unwin.eng
dcterms.referencesPaton, H. J. (1929). Self-Identity. Mind, 38(151), 312-329. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXXVIII.151.312eng
dcterms.referencesPowell, C. T. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.eng
dcterms.referencesPrichard, H. A. (1909). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Oxford University Press. Rockmore, T. (2012). Kant on Unconscious Mental Activity. In P. Giordanetti, R. Pozzo and M. Sgarbi (Eds.), Kant’s Philosophy of the Unconscious (pp. 305-326). Berlin: De Gruyter.eng
dcterms.referencesRousseau, J. J. (1979). Emile or On Education. A. Bloom (Ed.), New York: Basic Books.eng
dcterms.referencesStephenson, A. (2017). Imagination and Inner Intuition. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 104-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesStrawson, P. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesSvare, H. (2006). Body and Practice in Kant. Dordrecht: Springer.eng
dcterms.referencesWaxman, W. (1991). Kant’s Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. New York: Oxford University.eng
dcterms.referencesWilson, H. L. (2011). The Pragmatic Use of Kant’s Physical Geography. In S. Elden and E. Mendieta (Eds.), Reading Kant’s Geography (pp. 161-172). Albany: State University of New York Press.eng
dcterms.referencesWolff, C. (1972). Psychologia Rationalis. In J. École (Ed.), Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, II, 6 (pp. 50-572). Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (First published 1740).eng
dcterms.referencesWolff, C. (1968) Psychologia Empirica. In J. École (Ed.), Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, II, 5 (pp. 22-611). Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (First published 1738).eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Kant_on_Empirical_and_Transcendental.pdf
Tamaño:
947.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
PDF
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
381 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones