Análisis de la figura de la caducidad del medio de control de reparación directa en delitos de lessa humanidad frente al control de convencionalidad
Cargando...
Fecha
2021
Autores
Palencia Martínez, Jessica Lizeth
Ortiz, Tulio Adrián
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente escrito versa sobre la caducidad en el medio de control de reparación directa frente a los delitos de lesa humanidad, conociendo desde una perspectiva los cambios jurisprudenciales, toda vez que recientemente el Consejo de Estado cambió la línea jurisprudencial permitiendo la prescripción frente a los delitos de lesa humanidad, a la luz de la Sentencia de Unificación del 29 de enero de 2020, proferida por el alto Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo, sentó precedente sobre la obligatoriedad del término de caducidad común de dos años, contados a partir del conocimiento del daño antijurídico, para interponer contra el Estado pretensiones de reparación directa derivadas de graves violaciones de derechos humanos, como lo son los delitos de lesa humanidad. Sin embargo, una vez fijado el cambio jurisprudencial el cual ha afectado a un gran grupo de personas con la decisión unificada ya prescrita, es necesario mencionar o remitirse al concepto, alcance y campo de aplicación del control de convencionalidad enmarcado en los diferentes pronunciamientos de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos; lo anterior desarrollando una investigación cualitativa tipo ensayo, en donde se analizará la sentencia unificada del Consejo de Estado, frente a las decisiones proferidas por la CIDH en materia de control de convencionalidad en delitos de lesa humanidad.
This writing deals with the expiration in the means of direct reparation control against crimes against humanity, knowing from a perspective the jurisprudential changes, since recently the Council of State changed the jurisprudential line allowing the prescription against crimes against humanity, in light of the Sentence of Unification of January 29, 2020, delivered by the High Court of Administrative Litigation, set a precedent on the obligatory nature of the common expiration term of two years, counted from the knowledge of the damage unlawful, to file against the State claims for direct reparation derived from serious human rights violations, such as crimes against humanity. However, once the jurisprudential change has been established, which has affected a large group of people with the unified decision already prescribed, it is necessary to mention or refer to the concept, scope and field of application of conventionality control framed in the different pronouncements of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights; This is carried out by developing a qualitative trial-type investigation, in which the unified judgment of the Council of State will be analyzed, against the decisions issued by the IACHR in matters of control of conventionality in crimes against humanity.
This writing deals with the expiration in the means of direct reparation control against crimes against humanity, knowing from a perspective the jurisprudential changes, since recently the Council of State changed the jurisprudential line allowing the prescription against crimes against humanity, in light of the Sentence of Unification of January 29, 2020, delivered by the High Court of Administrative Litigation, set a precedent on the obligatory nature of the common expiration term of two years, counted from the knowledge of the damage unlawful, to file against the State claims for direct reparation derived from serious human rights violations, such as crimes against humanity. However, once the jurisprudential change has been established, which has affected a large group of people with the unified decision already prescribed, it is necessary to mention or refer to the concept, scope and field of application of conventionality control framed in the different pronouncements of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights; This is carried out by developing a qualitative trial-type investigation, in which the unified judgment of the Council of State will be analyzed, against the decisions issued by the IACHR in matters of control of conventionality in crimes against humanity.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Prescripción, Delitos de lesa humanidad, Reparación directa, Caducidad, Control de convencionalidad, Prescription, Crimes against humanity, Direct reparation, Expiration, Conventionality control
