Debido proceso y jurisdicción constitucional. Una necesidad en la justicia colombiana. Estudio comparado entre el constitucionalismo colombiano y el peruano
Cargando...
Fecha
2025
Autores
Moscote Gutiérrez, Jessica Julieth
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente artículo científico se propuso como objetivo general comparar las Legislaciones colombiana y peruana frente a la regulación de un código procesal constitucional y la instalación de una jurisdicción constitucional para el estudio y debate de acciones de tutela. Lo anterior en el entendido, que una de las principales criticas que se le hace al constitucionalismo colombiano es la carencia de un debido proceso para el transito de acciones constitucionales, lo que va acompañado de una absoluta ausencia de juzgados especiales para el tratamiento de tales causas. Lo plasmado ha incomodado históricamente a la academia constitucionalista, quienes consideran que la resolución de controversias jurídicas que involucran derechos fundamentales es un asunto que debe ser resuelto mediante herramientas procesales claras y una jurisdicción exclusiva para tal finalidad, conllevando la omisión de dicho mandato al error y revictimización de los ciudadanos en la defensa de sus derechos constitucionales particulares. A tal efecto, el presente documento revisara el derecho comparado Latinoamericano, especialmente la constitucionalidad y legalidad peruana, con el objetivo de demostrar la necesidad de solemnización de un debido proceso y una jurisdicción constitucional para la atención de acciones de amparo en Colombia.
The general objective of this scientific article was to compare the Colombian and Peruvian Legislations regarding the regulation of a constitutional procedural code and the installation of a constitutional jurisdiction for the study and debate of guardianship actions. The above is understood to be that one of the main criticisms made of Colombian constitutionalism is the lack of due process for the transit of constitutional actions, which is accompanied by an absolute absence of special courts for the treatment of such causes. What has been expressed has historically bothered constitutional academia, who consider that the resolution of legal controversies that involve fundamental rights is a matter that must be resolved through clear procedural tools and an exclusive jurisdiction for such purpose, leading to the omission of said mandate to error and revictimization of citizens in the defense of their particular constitutional rights. To this end, this document will review Latin American comparative law, especially Peruvian constitutionality and legality, with the objective of demonstrating the need to solemnize due process and constitutional jurisdiction for the attention of amparo actions in Colombia.
The general objective of this scientific article was to compare the Colombian and Peruvian Legislations regarding the regulation of a constitutional procedural code and the installation of a constitutional jurisdiction for the study and debate of guardianship actions. The above is understood to be that one of the main criticisms made of Colombian constitutionalism is the lack of due process for the transit of constitutional actions, which is accompanied by an absolute absence of special courts for the treatment of such causes. What has been expressed has historically bothered constitutional academia, who consider that the resolution of legal controversies that involve fundamental rights is a matter that must be resolved through clear procedural tools and an exclusive jurisdiction for such purpose, leading to the omission of said mandate to error and revictimization of citizens in the defense of their particular constitutional rights. To this end, this document will review Latin American comparative law, especially Peruvian constitutionality and legality, with the objective of demonstrating the need to solemnize due process and constitutional jurisdiction for the attention of amparo actions in Colombia.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Constitucionalismo, Debido proceso constitucional, Acciones tutela, Derecho comparado, Proceso amparo
