Impacto de la rebiopsia renal en la evaluación de la actividad y cronicidad de la nefritis lúpica y su correlación con la respuesta clínica

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.contributor.advisorAroca-Martinez, Gustavo
dc.contributor.advisorNiño Hernández, Lucia Mercedes
dc.contributor.advisorGonzález-Torres, Henry J.
dc.contributor.authorCastro Hernández, Christian
dc.contributor.authorVallejo Patiño, María Manuela
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T22:40:56Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T22:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractLa nefritis lúpica (NL) es una complicación grave del lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES), asociada con alta morbilidad y mortalidad, especialmente en sus formas proliferativas (clases III y IV). La biopsia renal desempeña un papel clave en el diagnóstico y tratamiento, pero la rebiopsia ha surgido como una herramienta crucial para evaluar la respuesta a la terapia inmunosupresora, detectar inflamación subclínica y monitorear la progresión del daño renal crónico. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de la rebiopsia renal en la detección de la actividad subclínica y la progresión del daño crónico en pacientes con nefritis lúpica proliferativa, y su correlación con la respuesta clínica para optimizar el manejo terapéutico en una población del Caribe colombiano. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio observacional y prospectivo en un centro de referencia en Barranquilla, Colombia, que incluyó pacientes con NL proliferativa (clases III, IV o V), confirmada por biopsia, y que fueron sometidos a rebiopsia después de al menos 24 meses de terapia inmunosupresora. Las variables analizadas incluyeron edad, sexo, creatinina, proteinuria, tasa de filtrado glomerular (TFG), niveles de complemento, anti-dsDNA, índices de actividad y cronicidad, y la respuesta clínica (completa, parcial o sin respuesta). El análisis estadístico incluyó ANOVA, Chi-cuadrado y pruebas t de Student para comparar las biopsias iniciales y las de seguimiento. Resultados: Se incluyeron 51 pacientes, el 82% de los cuales eran mujeres, con una edad promedio de 37 ± 12 años. Las formas proliferativas fueron las más comunes (86%). No se observaron diferencias significativas entre los sexos en cuanto a edad, histología o parámetros clínicos (todos p > 0.05). Se encontró una correlación moderada entre la proteinuria de 24 horas y los tiempos de coagulación (p < 0.001). En la rebiopsia, se observó una disminución significativa de la TFG y un aumento de la creatinina sérica (p < 0.001 y p = 0.03, respectivamente). La respuesta histológica fue pobre, con el 96% de los pacientes sin mejoría, y los índices de cronicidad aumentaron significativamente (p = 0.001). Conclusión: La rebiopsia renal es una herramienta esencial para detectar actividad subclínica y la progresión del daño renal en pacientes con NL, lo que subraya la necesidad de una evaluación integrada histopatológica y clínica en el manejo de formas agresivas de NLspa
dc.description.abstractLupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with high morbidity and mortality, especially in proliferative forms (classes III and IV). Renal biopsy plays a key role in diagnosis and treatment, but rebiopsy has emerged as crucial for assessing immunosuppressive therapy response, detecting subclinical inflammation, and monitoring chronic kidney damage progression. Objetive: To evaluate the impact of repeat kidney biopsy in detecting subclinical activity and the progression of chronic damage in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, and its correlation with clinical response to optimize therapeutic management in a population from the Colombian Caribbean. Methodology: A prospective, observational study was conducted at a referral center in Barranquilla, Colombia, including patients with proliferative LN (classes III, IV, or V), confirmed by biopsy, followed by rebiopsy after at least 24 months of immunosuppressive therapy. Variables analyzed included age, sex, creatinine, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), complement levels, anti-dsDNA, activity and chronicity indices, and clinical response (complete, partial, or no response). Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Chi-square, and Student’s t-tests for comparisons between initial and follow-up biopsies. Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 82% of whom were female, with an average age of 37 ± 12 years. Proliferative forms were most common (86%). There were no significant differences between sexes in terms of age, histology, or clinical parameters (all p > 0.05). A moderate correlation was found between 24-hour proteinuria and coagulation times (p < 0.001). A significant decline in GFR and an increase in serum creatinine were observed on rebiopsy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Histological response was poor, with 96% showing no improvement, and chronicity indices increased significantly (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Renal rebiopsy is an essential tool for detecting subclinical activity and progression of renal damage in LN patients, underscoring the need for integrated histopathological and clinical evaluation in managing aggressive LN forms.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16153
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectNefritis lúpicaspa
dc.subjectRebiopsia renalspa
dc.subjectActividad histopatológicaspa
dc.subjectInsuficiencia renal cónicaspa
dc.subjectRespuesta clínicaspa
dc.subject.keywordsLupus Nephritiseng
dc.subject.keywordsRepeat kidney biopsyeng
dc.subject.keywordsHistopathological activityeng
dc.subject.keywordsChronic renal failureeng
dc.subject.keywordsClinical responseeng
dc.titleImpacto de la rebiopsia renal en la evaluación de la actividad y cronicidad de la nefritis lúpica y su correlación con la respuesta clínicaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.spaOtros
dcterms.referencesParikh S V, Almaani S, Brodsky S, Rovin BH. Update on Lupus Nephritis: Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2020 Aug;76(2):265–81. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272638619311709eng
dcterms.referencesMusa R, Brent LH, Qurie A. Lupus Nephritis [Internet]. StatPearls. 2023. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30682900eng
dcterms.referencesNarváez J, Ricse M, Gomà M, Mitjavila F, Fulladosa X, Capdevila O, et al. The value of repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis flares. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7099.eng
dcterms.referencesFreedman BI, Langefeld CD, Andringa KK, Croker JA, Williams AH, Garner NE, et al. End-stage renal disease in African Americans with lupus nephritis is associated with APOL1. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ). 2014 Feb;66(2):390–6.eng
dcterms.referencesAnders H-J. Re-biopsy in lupus nephritis. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S41.eng
dcterms.referencesDavidson A. What is damaging the kidney in lupus nephritis? Nat Rev Rheumatol [Internet]. 2016;12(3):143–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581344eng
dcterms.referencesRodriguez-Ramirez S, Wiegley N, Mejia-Vilet JM. Kidney Biopsy in Management of Lupus Nephritis: A Case-Based Narrative Review. Kidney Med. 2024 Feb;6(2):100772.eng
dcterms.referencesReppe Moe SE, Molberg Ø, Strøm EH, Lerang K. Assessing the relative impact of lupus nephritis on mortality in a population-based systemic lupus erythematosus cohort. Lupus [Internet]. 2019 Jun;28(7):818–25. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072277eng
dcterms.referencesWeening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan S V., Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int [Internet]. 2004 Feb;65(2):521–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14717922eng
dcterms.referencesMalvar A, Alberton V, Lococo B, Lourenco M, Martinez J, Burna L, et al. Remission of lupus nephritis: the trajectory of histological response in successfully treated patients. Lupus Sci Med. 2023 May;10(1).eng
dcterms.referencesSchnuelle P. Renal Biopsy for Diagnosis in Kidney Disease: Indication, Technique, and Safety. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct;12(19).eng
dcterms.referencesYusuf AA, Govender MA, Brandenburg J-T, Winkler CA. Kidney disease and APOL1. Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Apr;30(R1):R129–37.eng
dcterms.referencesAlsuwaida AO. The clinical significance of serial kidney biopsies in lupus nephritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014 May;24(3):453–6.eng
dcterms.referencesBada M, Rapisarda S, Cicero C, DI Mauro M, Sebben M, DE Concilio B, et al. The role of renal biopsy to improve small renal mass diagnosis and management: are there predictive factors for a higher detection rate?. The first Italian study of 100 cases. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Feb;73(1):78–83.eng
dcterms.referencesJustiz Vaillant AA, Goyal A, Varacallo M. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [Internet]. StatPearls. 2023. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246682eng
dcterms.referencesYang Y, Huang D, Liu C, Zhong N, Peng Y, Wang L, et al. Early diagnosis and clinical application of systemic lupus erythematosus based on a nomogram model. Heliyon. 2024 Jan;10(2):e24523.eng
dcterms.referencesAndrew S Bomback, MD, MPHGerald B Appel M. Lupus nephritis: Diagnosis and classification. uptodate. 2024.eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz-Irastorza G, Espinosa G, Frutos MA, Jiménez-Alonso J, Praga M, Pallarés L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Lupus nephritis: Consensus document from the systemic auto-immune disease group (GEAS) of the Spanish society of internal medicine (SEMI) and the Spanish society of nephrology (S.E.N.). Nefrologia. 2012;32(SUPPL. 1):1–45eng
dcterms.referencesRovin BH, Parikh S V, Alvarado A. The kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis: is it still relevant? Rheum Dis Clin North Am [Internet]. 2014 Aug;40(3):537–52, ix. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25034161eng
dcterms.referencesHull KL, Adenwalla SF, Topham P, Graham-Brown MP. Indications and considerations for kidney biopsy: an overview of clinical considerations for the non-specialist. Clin Med. 2022 Jan;22(1):34–40.eng
dcterms.referencesMalvar A, Pirruccio P, Alberton V, Lococo B, Recalde C, Fazini B, et al. Histologic versus clinical remission in proliferative lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(8):1338–44.eng
dcterms.referencesMarinaki S, Kapsia E, Liapis G, Gakiopoulou H, Skalioti C, Kolovou K, et al. Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease. Eur J Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;7(1):2–8.eng
dcterms.referencesChoi S-E, Fogo AB, Lim BJ. Histologic evaluation of activity and chronicity of lupus nephritis and its clinical significance. Kidney Res Clin Pract [Internet]. 2023 Mar;42(2):166–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037479eng
dcterms.referencesZakharova E V, Makarova TA, Zvonova E V, Anilina AM, Stolyarevich ES. Immunosuppressive Treatment for Lupus Nephritis: Long-Term Results in 178 Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7407919eng
dcterms.referencesGasparotto M, Gatto M, Binda V, Doria A, Moroni G. Lupus nephritis: clinical presentations and outcomes in the 21st century. Rheumatology [Internet]. 2020 Dec 5;59(Suppl5):v39–51. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/59/Supplement_5/v39/6024733eng
dcterms.referencesHasan B, Fike A, Hasni S. Health disparities in systemic lupus erythematosus-a narrative review. Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Nov;41(11):3299–311.eng
dcterms.referencesAbid Q, Best Rocha A, Larsen CP, Schulert G, Marsh R, Yasin S, et al. APOL1-Associated Collapsing Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in a Patient With Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING)-Associated Vasculopathy With Onset in Infancy (SAVI). Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):287–90.eng
dcterms.referencesPollak MR, Genovese G, Friedman DJ. APOL1 and kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012 Mar;21(2):179–82.eng
dcterms.referencesPortalatin GM, Gebreselassie SK, Bobart SA. Lupus nephritis – An update on disparities affecting african americans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2022 Jun;114(3):S34–42.eng
dcterms.referencesYoung M, Leslie SW. Renal Biopsy. StatPearls. 2024.eng
dcterms.referencesQuan X-Y, Chen H-T, Liang S-Q, Yang C, Yao C-W, Xu Y-Z, et al. Revisited Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2022;2022:8345737. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707391eng
dcterms.referencesTrevisonno M, Hall A, Rosengarten S, Ginzler EM. Mycophenolate Mofetil for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Our 20-Year Experience. Cureus. 2023 Jan;eng
dcterms.referencesMejía-Vilet JM, Ayoub I. The Use of Glucocorticoids in Lupus Nephritis: New Pathways for an Old Drug. Front Med [Internet]. 2021;8:622225. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665199eng
dcterms.referencesPonticelli C, Reggiani F, Moroni G. Old and New Calcineurin Inhibitors in Lupus Nephritis. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct;10(21):4832.eng
dcterms.referencesTaylor EB, Ryan MJ. Understanding mechanisms of hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Mar;11(1):20–32.eng
dcterms.referencesSajjad S, Farman S, Saeed MA, Ahmad NM, Butt BA. Frequency of Dyslipidemia in patients with Lupus Nephritis. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2017;33(2):358–62.eng
dcterms.referencesGuruswamy Sangameswaran KD, Hashmi MF, Baradhi KM. Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. StatPearls. 2024.eng
dcterms.referencesLledó-Ibáñez GM, Xipell M, Gomes MF, Solé M, Garcia-Herrera A, Cervera R, et al. Kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis after achieving clinical renal remission: paving the way for renal outcome assessment. Clin Kidney J. 2022 Oct;15(11):2081–8.eng
dcterms.referencesParodis I, Adamichou C, Aydin S, Gomez A, Demoulin N, Weinmann-Menke J, et al. Per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy portends relapse and long-term outcome in incident cases of proliferative lupus nephritis. Rheumatology. 2020 Nov;59(11):3424–34.eng
dcterms.referencesSangapur RN, Patel GNR. Pattern of repeat kidney biopsy findings in quiescent proliferative lupus nephritis. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022;9(1):374–80.eng
dcterms.referencesDe Rosa M, Azzato F, Toblli JE, De Rosa G, Fuentes F, Nagaraja HN, et al. A prospective observational cohort study highlights kidney biopsy findings of lupus nephritis patients in remission who flare following withdrawal of maintenance therapy. Kidney Int. 2018 Oct;94(4):788–94eng
dcterms.referencesMatta EG, Rubini DA, Araújo NC. Effect of systemic arterial hypertension and use of antiproteinuric drug in induction therapy for lupus nephritis. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020;18:eAO5322.eng
dcterms.referencesLiu JL, Pineau CA, Grenier L-P, Vinet E, Kalache F, Lukusa L, et al. Treatment patterns and control of hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov;11(11):e048384.eng
dcterms.referencesNachman PH. Repeat kidney biopsy for lupus nephritis: an important step forward. Kidney Int. 2018 Oct;94(4):659–61eng
dcterms.referencesWeeding E, Fava A, Magder L, Goldman D, Petri M. One-third of patients with lupus nephritis classified as complete responders continue to accrue progressive renal damage despite resolution of proteinuria. Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Apr;9(1).eng
dcterms.referencesHanly JG, O’Keeffe AG, Su L, Urowitz MB, Romero-Diaz J, Gordon C, et al. The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: Results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2015;55(2):252–62eng
dcterms.referencesRijnink EC, Teng YKO, Wilhelmus S, Almekinders M, Wolterbeek R, Cransberg K, et al. Clinical and Histopathologic Characteristics Associated with Renal Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol [Internet]. 2017 May 8;12(5):734–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473317eng
dcterms.referencesSánchez-Cubías SM, Guaracha-Basañez GA, Sandoval-Flores MG, Domínguez-Quintana M, Romero-Díaz J. The value of repeat kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis. A systematic review. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2021 Jun;28:44–52.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
sb.programaEspecialización en Medicina Internaspa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF_RESUMEN.pdf
Tamaño:
182.71 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
829.07 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.93 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones