El dictamen pericial y el acceso a la administración de justicia en Colombia a partir de la ley 2080 de 2021
Cargando...
Fecha
2022
Autores
Pérez Álvarez, German Orlando
Almeida Chasoy, Eduard Yesith
Villasmil Munar, Javier Leonardo
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El objetivo principal de este artículo de investigación es demostrar como normas del ordenamiento colombiano generan imposibilidad y vulneración al principio procesal y derecho al acceso a la justicia, en el entendido de que existen imperativos normativos como lo son la aportación de dictamen pericial en casos de responsabilidad médica, que sin lugar a dudas, impiden la posible reclamación de muchas personas que no cuentan con los recursos para allegar este requisito impuesto al proceso y hacerlo valer dentro del mismo. Lo anterior es solo uno de los puntos que pretende analizar el presente escrito, puesto que es claro que desde la práctica profesional del derecho existen otros imperativos normativos que, en vez de generar un acercamiento entre el ciudadano de a pie con el derecho y la justicia, lo que hace es generar una brecha enorme entre estos. Así las cosas, se torna indispensable desarrollar inicialmente un análisis jurídico a la ley 2080 del 2021 la cual modifica la ley 1437 del 2011, respecto a la práctica de la prueba pericial, puesto que se evidencia la apertura de la posibilidad de acceder a la justicia dentro de un proceso de responsabilidad médica sin la necesidad de allegar dicho dictamen, en razón a que se faculta a las partes intervinientes poder solicitar al juzgado de conocimiento la práctica de la misma, la cual podrá ser decretada a su vez de manera oficiosa por dicho juez competente, procediéndose con la designación de un auxiliar de la justicia quien estará facultado para llevar a cabo el mismo.
The main objective of this research article is to demonstrate how regulations of the Colombian legal system generate impossibility and violation of the procedural principle and right to access to justice, in the understanding that there are normative imperatives such as the provision of expert opinion in cases of responsibility. which, without a doubt, prevent the possible claim of many people who do not have the resources to meet this requirement imposed on the process and enforce it within it. The foregoing is only one of the points that this writing intends to analyze, since it is clear that from the professional practice of law there are other normative imperatives that, instead of generating a rapprochement between the ordinary citizen with the law and justice , what it does is create a huge gap between them.Thus, it becomes essential to initially develop a legal analysis of Law 2080 of 2021, which modifies Law 1437 of 2011, regarding the practice of expert evidence, since the opening of the possibility of accessing justice is evident. within a process of medical responsibility without the need to file said opinion, because the intervening parties are empowered to request the court of knowledge the practice of the same, which may be decreed in turn informally by said competent judge, proceeding with the appointment of a justice assistant who will be empowered to carry out the same
The main objective of this research article is to demonstrate how regulations of the Colombian legal system generate impossibility and violation of the procedural principle and right to access to justice, in the understanding that there are normative imperatives such as the provision of expert opinion in cases of responsibility. which, without a doubt, prevent the possible claim of many people who do not have the resources to meet this requirement imposed on the process and enforce it within it. The foregoing is only one of the points that this writing intends to analyze, since it is clear that from the professional practice of law there are other normative imperatives that, instead of generating a rapprochement between the ordinary citizen with the law and justice , what it does is create a huge gap between them.Thus, it becomes essential to initially develop a legal analysis of Law 2080 of 2021, which modifies Law 1437 of 2011, regarding the practice of expert evidence, since the opening of the possibility of accessing justice is evident. within a process of medical responsibility without the need to file said opinion, because the intervening parties are empowered to request the court of knowledge the practice of the same, which may be decreed in turn informally by said competent judge, proceeding with the appointment of a justice assistant who will be empowered to carry out the same
Descripción
Palabras clave
Acceso a la Justicia, Derecho médico, Dictamen, Perito, Access to justice, Medical law, Opinion, Expert
