Testimonio adjunto en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano
Fecha
2024
Autores
Niño Alvarez, Ingrid Yurley
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
En el desarrollo de este ensayo, se analizarán los diferentes enfoques en cuanto a la aplicación del testimonio adjunto, visto como una técnica procesal, en la cual se habilita la incorporación de declaraciones anteriores dentro del desarrollo propio del juicio, enmarcado propiamente en el sistema penal acusatorio colombiano. De tal manera cuando que al surgir una retractación o modificación sustancial en el desarrollo del juicio frente a la versión de un testigo. En estos casos específicos, la parte que está interrogando queda habilitada para utilizar preguntas sugestivas con el fin de evidenciar las inconsistencias leídas, y de esa manera permitir que el juez pueda valorar tanto lo declarado en juicio, como la versión ofrecida fuera del mismo.
Con base en lo anterior es preciso abordar los conceptos propios de las técnicas procesales y los requisitos del testimonio adjunto, así como el interrogatorio del testigo, el manejo propio del testimonio adjunto y las manifestaciones anteriores, con el fin de que el juez pueda valorar tanto lo declarado en juicio, como la versión ofrecida fuera del mismo.
In the development of this essay, the different approaches will be analyzed regarding the application of attached testimony, seen as a procedural technique, in which the incorporation of previous statements is enabled within the proper development of the trial, properly framed in the criminal system. Colombian accusatory. In such a way, when a retraction or substantial modification arises in the development of the trial against the version of a witness. In these specific cases, the party who is interrogating is authorized to use suggestive questions in order to highlight the inconsistencies read, and in this way allow the judge to evaluate both what was declared at trial and the version offered outside of it. Based on the above, it is necessary to address the concepts of the procedural techniques and the requirements of the attached testimony, as well as the interrogation of the witness, the proper handling of the attached testimony and the previous statements, so that the judge can assess both what was declared in court, as well as the version offered outside of it.
In the development of this essay, the different approaches will be analyzed regarding the application of attached testimony, seen as a procedural technique, in which the incorporation of previous statements is enabled within the proper development of the trial, properly framed in the criminal system. Colombian accusatory. In such a way, when a retraction or substantial modification arises in the development of the trial against the version of a witness. In these specific cases, the party who is interrogating is authorized to use suggestive questions in order to highlight the inconsistencies read, and in this way allow the judge to evaluate both what was declared at trial and the version offered outside of it. Based on the above, it is necessary to address the concepts of the procedural techniques and the requirements of the attached testimony, as well as the interrogation of the witness, the proper handling of the attached testimony and the previous statements, so that the judge can assess both what was declared in court, as well as the version offered outside of it.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Técnica procesal, Libertad probatoria, Debido proceso, Legalidad, Declaraciones anteriores al juicio
