Logotipo del repositorio
Logotipo del repositorio
 

Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults

Vista sencilla de ítem
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.contributor.authorCudris-Torres, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorVinaccia, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorBARRIOS NUÑEZ, ALVARO
dc.contributor.authorGaviria Arrieta, Natali
dc.contributor.authorGOMEZ, MARTHA LUZ
dc.contributor.authorOlivella López, Giselle
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Lalinde, Juan
dc.contributor.authorBermudez, Valmore
dc.contributor.authorlobato perez, olaiza esther
dc.contributor.authorNiño Vega, Jorge Armando
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Obeid, Jorge Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Fernández, Román José
dc.contributor.authorJAVELA, JULIAN
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T21:17:08Z
dc.date.available2025-01-17T21:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground Self-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual’s effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of self-efficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being. Methods The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for managing chronic diseases (SEMCD-S) by assessing factorial, convergent and divergent validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Likewise, the comparison of self-efficacy according to socio-demographic characteristics was proposed by contrasting latent factors. An instrumental, transactional, descriptive, and non-experimental design study was carried out with the participation of 325 Colombian senior citizens. Results The findings suggest that the scale has appropriate psychometric properties. The one-factor structure exhibited a satisfactory fit, the mean-variance extracted reported acceptable figures and the correlation analysis with other constructs supported this instrument’s convergent and discriminant validity. Likewise, it was invariant to the different socio-demographic aspects examined, while the internal consistency figures were high. Differences in the means of the latent factors were only detected in the academic grade. In this case, older adults with a primary school level attained higher self-efficacy values than those who had completed high school or university studies. Conclusions It is concluded that the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Colombian context to measure and compare this construct.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.citationCudris-Torres, L., Alpi, S.V., Barrios-Núñez, Á. et al. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults. BMC Psychol 11, 301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
dc.identifier.issn20507283 (Electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16115
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Naturespa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourceBMC Psychologyeng
dc.sourceVol. 11 (2023)spa
dc.subject.keywordsSelf-efficacyeng
dc.subject.keywordsChronic diseaseseng
dc.subject.keywordsPsychometric propertieseng
dc.subject.keywordsOlder adultseng
dc.subject.keywordsColombiaeng
dc.titlePsychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adultseng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.spaArtículo científico
dcterms.referencesBandura A. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Therapy Experimental Psychiatry. 1982;13(3):195–99. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90004-0eng
dcterms.referencesBandura A. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J Manag. 2012;38(1):9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606eng
dcterms.referencesGarcía Álvarez D, Cobo Rendón R, Hernández Lalinde JD. Validity, reliability and factorial invariance of the general self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy scales in university students. Retos. 2022;46:1093–104. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.94281eng
dcterms.referencesMena-Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza-Parra S. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud. 2018;23(2):67–78. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2018.23.2.5. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno.spa
dcterms.referencesMartín Alfonso L, Grau Ábalo JA, Espinosa Brito AD. Marco conceptual para la evaluación y mejora de la adherencia a los tratamientos médicos en enfermedades crónicas. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública. 2014;40(2):222–35.spa
dcterms.referencesIglesias Álvarez N. Efectividad de una intervención educativa basada en la autoeficacia para mejorar la adherencia terapéutica en pacientes con hipertensión arterial del CAP de la Barceloneta. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra; 2018.spa
dcterms.referencesHirschberg S, Donatti S, Rijana I, Selan V. La relación entre adherencia terapéutica y calidad de vida en la hipertensión arterial. PSIENCIA Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica. 2014;6(2):64–70.spa
dcterms.referencesCudris-Torres L, Alpi SV, Barrios-Núñez Á, Gaviria Arrieta N, Mejía Gutiérrez J, Alvis Barranco L, Rios-Carlys G, Cuenca-Calderón SE, Bermúdez V, Hernández-Lalinde J, Riveira Zuleta CA, Bahamón MJ and Álvarez, Herrera JS. (2023) Quality of life in the older adults: The protective role of self-efficacy in adequate coping in patients with chronic diseases. Front. Psychol. 14:1106563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106563eng
dcterms.referencesRitter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1265–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009eng
dcterms.referencesKanan LA, Bellinati N, Veronez C, Pereira L. Self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale: avaliação da autoeficácia no gerenciamento da doença crônica. Revista CUIDARTE. 2018;9(3):2435–45. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v9i3.561por
dcterms.referencesFreund T, Gensichen J, Goetz K, Szecsenyi J, Mahler C. Evaluating self-efficacy for managing chronic disease: psychometric properties of the six-item self-efficacy scale in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011. 01764.x.eng
dcterms.referencesEslami A, Daniali SS, Mohammadi K, Reisi-Dehkordi N, Mostafavi-Darani F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Self-Efficacy in Chronic Disease Patients. Iran J Nursering Midwifery Res. 2017;22(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.202065eng
dcterms.referencesKim SN, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Lee N. Validity and reliability of Korean Version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021;51(5):617–29. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21069eng
dcterms.referencesMarconcin P, Tomé G, Carnide F, Yázigi F, Campos P, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the self-efficacy to manage chronic disease 6-item scale for european portuguese. Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa. 2021;46(1):15–22.eng
dcterms.referencesIncirkus K, Nahcivan N. Validity and reliability study of the turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;2650(5):1254–61. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-13eng
dcterms.referencesMena Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza Parra S. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno. Hacia Promoc. Salud [Internet]. 25 de mayo de 2018 [citado 26 de julio de 2023];23(2):67–78. Disponible en: https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/hacialapromociondelasalud/article/view/3603spa
dcterms.referencesMattsson M, Sandqvist G, Hesselstrand R, Olsson D, Kwakkenbos L, et al. Validity and reliability of the swedish version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale for individuals with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2022;51(2):110–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2021.1917142eng
dcterms.referencesHudon C, Chouinard MC, Bélanger A, Fortin M, Freund T, et al. The self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale – french version: a validation study in primary care. Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2014;2:533–38.eng
dcterms.referencesSarhan SA, Kamal DE, Hamed MS, Mostafa DI. Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(10):2967–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06183eng
dcterms.referencesRiehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, et al. Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network investigators. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Research. 2016;68(8):1195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22807eng
dcterms.referencesGarcía A, Moreno J, Suárez P. Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema. 2000;12(2):509–13.spa
dcterms.referencesNazar Carter G, Mendoza Parra S, Mena Díaz C. Autoeficacia y estrés como determinantes de adherencia en pacientes hipertensos. Comuna de Retiro, Región del Maule, Chile. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Psicología; 2017.spa
dcterms.referencesLorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Lynch J, Laurent D. Outcome measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. SAGE Publication; 1996.eng
dcterms.referencesKim CJ, Chae S, Yoo H. Psychometric testing of the chronic disease self-efficacy scale–korean version (CDSES-K). J Transcult Nurs. 2012;23(2):173–80.eng
dcterms.referencesAto M, López-García JJ, Benavent A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Annals of Psychology. 2013;29(3):3. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511spa
dcterms.referencesBloomfield J, Fisher MJ. Quantitative research design. J Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association. 2019;22(2):27–30. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.738299924514584eng
dcterms.referencesNunnally JC. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill; 1967.eng
dcterms.referencesClark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:309–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309eng
dcterms.referencesComrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;56(5):754–61. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.56.5.754eng
dcterms.referencesComrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Psychol Press. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506. 2nd ed.eng
dcterms.referencesGuadagnoli E, Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265eng
dcterms.referencesBroadbent E, Petrie K, Weinman J. The brief illness perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;631–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020eng
dcterms.referencesKrupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg D. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1988;46(10):1121–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022eng
dcterms.referencesKleinman L, Zodet M, Hakim Z, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the fatigue severity scale for use in chronic hepatitis C. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10089607104eng
dcterms.referencesMattsson B, Möller IE, Lundberg G, Boström C. Reliability and validity of the fatigue severity scale in swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(4):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740801914868eng
dcterms.referencesWare JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.eng
dcterms.referencesAlonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;104:771–6.spa
dcterms.referencesGarratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;324(7351):1417–23.eng
dcterms.referencesKenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in Models with Small degrees of Freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44(3):486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236eng
dcterms.referencesHu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 199;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118eng
dcterms.referencesSteiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Pers Indiv Differ. 2007;42(5):893–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017eng
dcterms.referencesHamid MR, Sami W, Sidek MH. Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017;890. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163eng
dcterms.referencesHernández Lalinde JD, Espinosa Castro JF, Peñaloza Tarazona ME, Fernández González JE, Chacón Rangel JG, Toloza Sierra CA, et al. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):587–95.spa
dcterms.referencesHernández-Lalinde J, Espinosa-Castro JF, Penaloza-Tarazona ME, Díaz-Camargo É, Bautista-Sandoval M, Riaño-Garzón ME, et al. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):552–61. https://doi.org/10.17632/x9tghxpdc3.1. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: verificación de supuestos mediante un ejemplo aplicado a las ciencias de la salud.eng
dcterms.referencesSatorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192eng
dcterms.referencesCampo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades Psicométricas de una Escala: la Consistencia Interna. Revista de Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008;10(5):831–9. Recuperado de:. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42210515spa
dcterms.referencesCheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 2002;9(2):233–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5eng
dcterms.referencesHancock GR. Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured mean modelling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika. 2001;66(3):373–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440eng
dcterms.referencesCartagena Beteta M. Relación entre la autoeficacia y el rendimiento escolar y los hábitos de estudio en alumnos de secundaria. REICE Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 2008;6(3):59–99.spa
dcterms.referencesBarrera-Mesa CE, Caro-Caro EO, Del Rey-Alamillo R. Víctimas de ciberviolencia: formas, prevalencia y diferencias de género. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):239–50. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15268spa
dcterms.referencesFröhner J, Beckerle P, Endo S, Hirche S. An embodiment paradigm in evaluation of human-in-the-loop control. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;51(34):104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.036eng
dcterms.referencesYang J, Ambrose Lo WL, Zheng F, Cheng X, Yu Q, Wang C. Evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving Pain, Fear Avoidance, and self-efficacy in patients with chronic low back Pain: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pain Res Manage. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4276175eng
dcterms.referencesLa Touche R, Salud CS, La Salle EU, Of Fisioterapia CS, de Madrid A, de La EU. Madrid. How does self-efficacy influence pain perception, postural stability and range of motion in individuals with chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2019;22:E1-13.eng
dcterms.referencesAlvarez-Pitti J, Casajús Mallén JA, Trabazo RL, Lucía A, López de Lara D, Moreno Aznar LA, et al. Ejercicio físico como «medicina» en enfermedades crónicas durante la infancia y la adolescencia. Anales de Pediatría. 2020;92(3):173–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.01.010spa
dcterms.referencesBonilla-Cruz NJ, Moncada HO, Latorre Yáñez JD, Gómez Torres HD, Niño-Vega JA. Psychological well-being and suicide orientation in teachers in Norte de Santander during COVID – 19 confinement. Gaceta Médica De Caracas. 2022;130(Suplemento 3):727–33. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2022.130.s3.26eng
dcterms.referencesGrisales-Aguirre AM, Figueroa-Vallejo CJ. Modelado de tópicos aplicado al análisis del papel del aprendizaje automático en revisiones sistemáticas. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):265–78. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15271spa
dcterms.referencesWang DF, Zhou YN, Liu YH, et al. Social support and depressive symptoms: exploring stigma and self-efficacy in a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03740-6eng
dcterms.referencesRiehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, Mouthon L, et al. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(8):1195–200.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
1.36 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
381 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos

Universidad Simón Bolívar: Todos los derechos reservados / Sistema de biblioteca