Creencias y percepciones sobre la probabilidad de contraer el coronavirus en trabajadores de los sectores transporte y comunicación

datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecspa
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Ramos, Laura Milena
dc.contributor.authorGómez Marín, Katerine
dc.contributor.authorVásquez Gómez, Deimer
dc.contributor.authorZamora Cera, José Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T13:42:35Z
dc.date.available2021-05-11T13:42:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: Determinar las creencias y percepciones de los trabajadores sobre la probabilidad de contraer el coronavirus en la costa caribe colombiana. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio estadístico de corte transversal, en la que se utilizó un instrumento encuesta que determinaba las creencias y percepciones en salud relacionadas con el contagio por COVID-19, la cual, se aplicó a través de correos electrónicos a una población trabajadora de 180 personas de la Costa Caribe Colombiana. Resultados: La susceptibilidad percibida, frente a la creencia de contraer el coronavirus es débil con un 26,8%, la mayoría de las personas encuestadas, consideran mínima en un 50,5% la posibilidad de tener dificultades respiratorias, asimismo, este valor constata con que la mayor parte de los trabajadores ve moderada la posibilidad de que se tengan síntomas graves, dado que, el 39,2% así lo manifiestan. Respecto al lavado de manos, las personas aún consideran débil en un 27% la posibilidad de contagio si se realiza esta actividad. Conclusión: Se concluye que, en este sector, la percepción con las creencias y susceptibilidades que tienen los trabajadores se perciben como débil, puesto que, aún hay personas que consideran de poca importancia el uso del tapabocas para evitar el contagio, a su vez, se evidencia que las medidas de prevención como lavado de manos y uso de transportes alternativos tienen poca significancia para la población de estudio.spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: Determine the beliefs and perceptions of workers about the probability of contracting the coronavirus on the Colombian Caribbean coast. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional statistical study, in which a survey instrument was used to determine health beliefs and perceptions related to COVID-19 infection, which was applied through emails to a working population of 180 people from the Colombian Caribbean Coast. Results: The perceived susceptibility, compared to the belief of contracting the coronavirus is weak with 26.8%, most of the people surveyed, consider the possibility of having respiratory difficulties minimal in 50.5%, likewise, this value confirms that Most of the workers consider the possibility of having serious symptoms moderate, since 39.2% manifest it. Regarding hand washing, people still consider the possibility of contagion to be weak by 27% if this activity is carried out. Conclusions: It is concluded that, in this sector, the perception of the beliefs and susceptibilities that workers have is perceived as weak, since there are still people who consider the use of a mask to be of little importance to avoid contagion, in turn, it is evident that prevention measures such as hand washing and use of alternative transportation have little significance for the study population.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/7636
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCovid-19spa
dc.subjectProtocolospa
dc.subjectSusceptibilidadspa
dc.subjectCreenciasspa
dc.subjectPandemiaspa
dc.subjectAislamientospa
dc.subjectBioseguridadspa
dc.subjectProtocoleng
dc.subjectSusceptibilityeng
dc.subjectBeliefseng
dc.subjectPandemiceng
dc.subjectIsolationeng
dc.subjectBiosecurityeng
dc.titleCreencias y percepciones sobre la probabilidad de contraer el coronavirus en trabajadores de los sectores transporte y comunicaciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherspa
dc.type.spaOtrosspa
dcterms.referencesEmerson, KG. Coping with being cooped up: Social distancing during COVID-19 among 60+ in the United States. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e81. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.81.eng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. Coronavirus. Genova; 2020spa
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2021.eng
dcterms.referencesPatiño-Lugo D, Vélez M, Velásquez S, Vera-Giraldo C, Vélez V, Marín I, et al. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for containment, mitigation and suppression of COVID-19 infection. Colomb. Med. 2020; 51(2): e4266 . https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v51i2.4266.eng
dcterms.referencesValero, N; Vélez, M; Durán, A; Portillo, M. Afrontamiento del COVID-19: estrés, miedo, ansiedad y depresión? Enferm Inv. 2020;5(3):63-70.spa
dcterms.referencesEngelhard IM, van Uijen SL, van Seters N, Velu N. The effects of safety behavior directed towards a safety cue on perceptions of threat. Behavior Therapy. 2015; 46(5): 604-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.12.006.eng
dcterms.referencesMedina MR. COVID-19: La no percepción del riesgo. Más Poder Local. 2020; 4: 34-35spa
dcterms.referencesDe Comic D, d'Haenens L, Matthijs K. Perceived vulnerability to disease and attitudes towards public health measures: COVID-19 in Flanders, Belgium. Pers Individ Dif. 2020; 166:110220. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110220.eng
dcterms.referencesPeres D, Monteiro J, Almeida M, Ladeira R. Risk Perception of COVID-19 Among the Portuguese Healthcare Professionals and General Population. J Hosp Infect. 2020;105(3):434–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.038.eng
dcterms.referencesMotta Zanin G, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093024.eng
dcterms.referencesGeldsetzer P. Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.eng
dcterms.referencesPedroso-Pupo JC, Pedroso-Cortés MJ, Campo-AA. Perceived stress associated with COVID-19 epidemic in Colombia: an online survey. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2020; 36(5): e00090520. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00090520.eng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. Prevención y control de infecciones en los centros de atención de larga estancia en el contexto de la COVID-19. 2020.spa
dcterms.referencesJones CL, Jensen JD, Scherr CL, Brown NR, Christy K, Weaver J. The Health Belief Model as an explanatory framework in communication research: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Commun. 2015;30(6):566-76. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.873363.eng
dcterms.referencesGlanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399-418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604.eng
dcterms.referencesChampion V, Skinner C. The Health Belief Model. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Glanz K, Rimer B and K. Viswanath. 4th ed. 2008.eng
dcterms.referencesCabrera AG, Tascón GJ, Lucumí CD. Creencias en salud: historia, constructos y aportes al modelo. Rev Fac Nal Salud Pública. 2001; 19(1): 91-101.spa
dcterms.referencesRodríguez IH, Mendoza ZD, Vasquez Giler, M. El Modelo de Creencia de Salud (HBM): un análisis bibliométrico. FACSALUD-UNEMI. 2020; 4(7): 43-54.spa
dcterms.referencesHenshaw E, Freedman-Doan C. Conceptualizing mental health care utilization using the Health Belief Model. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 2009; 16 (4): 420-439. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01181.xeng
dcterms.referencesOrji R, Vassileva J, Mandryk R. Towards an effective health interventions design: An extension of the Health Belief Model. J Public Health Inform. 2012; 4(3):e9, 2012eng
dcterms.referencesCarico RR Jr, Sheppard J, Thomas CB. Community pharmacists and communication in the time of COVID-19: Applying the health belief model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021; 17(1):1984-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.017.eng
dcterms.referencesInfield DL, Wongvatunyu S, Conn VS, Grando VT, Russell CL. Health belief model and reversal theory: a comparative analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 43(3):288-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02712.x.eng
dcterms.referencesJanz NK, Becker MH (1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11:1-47 https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101eng
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).eng
dcterms.referencesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Implementation of mitigation strategies for communities with local COVID-19 transmission. 2020.eng
dcterms.referencesPérez AM, Gómez TJ, Dieguez GR. Características clínico-epidemiológicas de la COVID-19. Rev haban cienc méd. 2021; 19: e3254.eng
dcterms.referencesYuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review. Clin Immunol. 2020; 215:108427. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427.eng
dcterms.referencesPollard CA, Morran MP, Nestor-Kalinoski AL. The COVID-19 pandemic: a global health crisis. Physiol Genomics. 2020 Nov 1;52(11):549-557. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00089.2020.eng
dcterms.referencesWiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020; 324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.eng
dcterms.referencesWilder-Smith A, Freedman DO. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020; 27(2):taaa020. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa020.eng
dcterms.referencesXu Y, Lin G, Spada C, Zhao H, Wang S, Chen X, et al. Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Behaviors Towards Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) During a National Epidemic-China. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:638430. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.638430.eng
dcterms.referencesSesagiri Raamkumar A, Tan SG, Wee HL. Use of health belief model-based deep learning classifiers for COVID-19 social media content to examine public perceptions of physical distancing: Model Development and Case Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6(3):e20493. doi: 10.2196/20493.eng
dcterms.referencesSim SW, Moey KS, Tan NC. The use of facemasks to prevent respiratory infection: a literature review in the context of the Health Belief Model. Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):160-7. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014037.eng
dcterms.referencesCosta MF. Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:47. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494.eng
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
sb.programaEspecialización en Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajospa
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PDF_Resumen
Tamaño:
724.4 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
PDF
Tamaño:
974.54 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Colecciones