Rompimiento de la solidaridad en el pago de servicios públicos domiciliarios
Cargando...
Fecha
2022
Autores
Agudelo Jaramillo, Luis Eduardo
Moreno Gómez, Armando Antonio
Gómez Cabrales, Jhon Jairo
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
Antecedentes: El presente trabajo tiene como propósito explicar el rompimiento de la solidaridad en el pago de servicios públicos domiciliarios, a pesar que artículo 130 de la Ley 142 de 1994 contempla la figura de la solidaridad, la cual aplica para las obligaciones y los derechos derivados del acuerdo. Esta investigación es de tipo documental, en la cual se estudió información registrada sobre la figura de la solidaridad en el pago de servicios públicos y su rompimiento, permitiendo hacer un análisis de tipo normativo. Los conceptos que se desarrollan en el presente trabajo se referencian y armonizan con la normatividad y reglamentación relacionada con la solidaridad de los servicios públicos domiciliarios y su rompimiento, debido a que presentan situaciones relacionadas con la vulneración de derechos a los usuarios. En esta medida se trabajaron tres capítulos en donde el primer capítulo habla de los intervinientes en el contrato de condiciones uniformes contrato de servicios públicos, el segundo capítulo hace mención a las obligaciones derivadas del contrato de condiciones uniformes “contrato de servicios públicos y el tercer capítulo hace énfasis en la configuración del rompimiento en cuanto a la solidaridad en la obligación del pago de servicios públicos domiciliarios. De acuerdo con lo anterior, con este trabajo se busca establecer cómo se presenta el rompimiento del principio de la solidaridad en cuanto al pago en los servicios públicos domiciliarios.
Objetivos: Con este trabajo se busca establecer cómo se presenta el rompimiento del principio de la solidaridad en cuanto al pago en los servicios públicos domiciliarios.
Materiales y Métodos: Esta investigación es de tipo documental, en la cual se estudió información registrada sobre la figura de la solidaridad en el pago de servicios públicos y su rompimiento, permitiendo hacer un análisis de tipo normativo. Los conceptos que se desarrollan en el presente trabajo se referencian y armonizan con la normatividad y reglamentación relacionada con la solidaridad de los servicios públicos domiciliarios y su rompimiento, debido a que presentan situaciones relacionadas con la vulneración de derechos a los usuarios.
Resultados: Conforme a la Ley 142 de 1994, se tiene establecido quienes son partes en el contrato de servicios públicos: A) la Empresa prestadora del servicio, B) El suscriptor y/o usuario/suscriptores. De acuerdo con lo anterior, la Ley dispuesto la solidaridad entre el propietario o poseedor del bien inmueble que goza del servicio, igualmente definió que el suscriptor y el usuario final del servicio son solidarios y responderán por las obligaciones y deberes que se han establecido en el contrato.
Conclusiones: Podemos concluir que la existencia del principio de solidaridad en cuanto al pago de los servicios públicos domiciliarios en Colombia tiene un origen constitucional, esto debido a que el Estado tiene una función como garante en la prestación de los servicios públicos, así mismo por ser Colombia un Estado Social de Derecho este tiene el deber de garantizar la prestación de dichos servicios. Así mismo al analizar principio de solidaridad, se concluye que dicho principio se enmarca en la relación existente entre el dueño, el suscriptor y el usuario final del bien inmueble, lo que permite que se logre determinar claramente ante quien recaer la solidaridad por deudas contraídas derivadas del consumo de los servicios públicos prestados por las empresas prestadoras del mismo dentro del contrato arrendamiento o en su defecto de condiciones uniformes. Si bien existe una solidaridad o participación en el pago de los servicios públicos, también es cierto que esta no es absoluta debido a que solo es aplicable para el cobro de los tres meses en que se incurrió en mora el usurario, transcurridos estos tres meses se rompe la solidaridad y el propietario no se hace responsable del pago de la deuda.
Background: The purpose of this paper is to explain the breakdown of solidarity in the payment of home public services, despite the fact that article 130 of Law 142 of 1994 contemplates the figure of solidarity, which applies to the obligations and rights derived from the agreement. This research is of a documentary type, in which recorded information on the figure of solidarity in the payment of public services and its breakdown was studied, allowing an analysis of a normative type. The concepts that are developed in the present work are referenced and harmonized with the norms and regulations related to the solidarity of home public services and their breakdown, due to the fact that they present situations related to the violation of user rights. To this extent, three chapters were worked on where the first chapter speaks of the participants in the contract of uniform conditions public services contract, the second chapter mentions the obligations derived from the contract of uniform conditions "contract of public services and the third chapter It emphasizes the configuration of the break in terms of solidarity in the obligation to pay for home public services. In accordance with the above, this work seeks to establish how the breaking of the principle of solidarity is presented in terms of payment in home public services. Objective: This work seeks to establish how the breaking of the principle of solidarity is presented in terms of payment in home public services. Materials and Methods: his research is of a documentary type, in which recorded information on the figure of solidarity in the payment of public services and its breakdown was studied, allowing an analysis of a normative type. The concepts that are developed in the present work are referenced and harmonized with the norms and regulations related to the solidarity of home public services and their breakdown, due to the fact that they present situations related to the violation of user rights. Results: Pursuant to Law 142 of 1994, it is established who are parties to the public service contract: A) the Company providing the service, B) The subscriber and/or user/subscribers. In accordance with the foregoing, the Law provides solidarity between the owner or possessor of the real estate that enjoys the service, it also defined that the subscriber and the end user of the service are joint and several and will be responsible for the obligations and duties that have been established in the contract. Conclusions: We can conclude that the existence of the principle of solidarity regarding the payment of residential public services in Colombia has a constitutional origin, this is due to the fact that the State has a function as guarantor in the provision of public services, also because Colombia is a Social State of Right this has the duty to guarantee the provision of said services. Likewise, when analyzing the principle of solidarity, it is concluded that said principle is part of the existing relationship between the owner, the subscriber and the end user of the real estate, which allows it to be clearly determined to whom to fall solidarity for derived debts. of the consumption of public services provided by the companies providing them within the lease contract or, failing that, under uniform conditions. Although there is solidarity or participation in the payment of public services, it is also true that this is not absolute because it is only applicable for the collection of the three months in which the user was in default, after these three months it breaks the solidarity and the owner is not responsible for the payment of the debt
Background: The purpose of this paper is to explain the breakdown of solidarity in the payment of home public services, despite the fact that article 130 of Law 142 of 1994 contemplates the figure of solidarity, which applies to the obligations and rights derived from the agreement. This research is of a documentary type, in which recorded information on the figure of solidarity in the payment of public services and its breakdown was studied, allowing an analysis of a normative type. The concepts that are developed in the present work are referenced and harmonized with the norms and regulations related to the solidarity of home public services and their breakdown, due to the fact that they present situations related to the violation of user rights. To this extent, three chapters were worked on where the first chapter speaks of the participants in the contract of uniform conditions public services contract, the second chapter mentions the obligations derived from the contract of uniform conditions "contract of public services and the third chapter It emphasizes the configuration of the break in terms of solidarity in the obligation to pay for home public services. In accordance with the above, this work seeks to establish how the breaking of the principle of solidarity is presented in terms of payment in home public services. Objective: This work seeks to establish how the breaking of the principle of solidarity is presented in terms of payment in home public services. Materials and Methods: his research is of a documentary type, in which recorded information on the figure of solidarity in the payment of public services and its breakdown was studied, allowing an analysis of a normative type. The concepts that are developed in the present work are referenced and harmonized with the norms and regulations related to the solidarity of home public services and their breakdown, due to the fact that they present situations related to the violation of user rights. Results: Pursuant to Law 142 of 1994, it is established who are parties to the public service contract: A) the Company providing the service, B) The subscriber and/or user/subscribers. In accordance with the foregoing, the Law provides solidarity between the owner or possessor of the real estate that enjoys the service, it also defined that the subscriber and the end user of the service are joint and several and will be responsible for the obligations and duties that have been established in the contract. Conclusions: We can conclude that the existence of the principle of solidarity regarding the payment of residential public services in Colombia has a constitutional origin, this is due to the fact that the State has a function as guarantor in the provision of public services, also because Colombia is a Social State of Right this has the duty to guarantee the provision of said services. Likewise, when analyzing the principle of solidarity, it is concluded that said principle is part of the existing relationship between the owner, the subscriber and the end user of the real estate, which allows it to be clearly determined to whom to fall solidarity for derived debts. of the consumption of public services provided by the companies providing them within the lease contract or, failing that, under uniform conditions. Although there is solidarity or participation in the payment of public services, it is also true that this is not absolute because it is only applicable for the collection of the three months in which the user was in default, after these three months it breaks the solidarity and the owner is not responsible for the payment of the debt
Descripción
Palabras clave
Servicios públicos domiciliarios, Solidaridad de los servicios públicos domiciliarios, Rompimiento de la solidaridad, Suscriptor, Usuario, Home public services, Solidarity of home public services, Breaking solidarity, Subscriber, User
