Mathematical argumentation in the classroom
dc.contributor.author | Salazar-Torres, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Vera, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Contreras, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Gelvez-Almeida, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Valbuena, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Barrera, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Rincón, O | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-14T23:19:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-14T23:19:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article shares some elements of comprehensive type about "mathematical argumentation in the classroom"; whose analysis, was made from two fundamental categories in the development of an oral mathematical argumentation process for the conviction, contradiction and validation of a written mathematical argumentation process. The research addressed two central categories of argumentation as a discursive form, the first one is the epistemic position, and the second one is the discursive position that students unveil at the time of mathematically arguing the solution to a problem situation. The research was developed under the interpretative paradigm through the design of a case study directed by the theory and technique of a focal group, for the collection of information. In the findings, difficulties in the passage were evidenced from the semantic to the theoretical from the epistemic position; regarding the discursive position, the presence of three discursive forms was revealed: description, explanation and argumentation, the latter being the least used by the students. | eng |
dc.format.mimetype | eng | |
dc.identifier.issn | 17426596 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/5106 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing | eng |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | eng |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Journal of Physics: Conference Series | eng |
dc.source | Vol. 1408 (2019) | eng |
dc.source.uri | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1408/1/012023 | eng |
dc.title | Mathematical argumentation in the classroom | eng |
dc.type | article | eng |
dc.type.driver | article | eng |
dcterms.references | Salazar J 2017 El modelo de indagación frente al desarrollo de la argumentación escrita. Encrucijadas pedagógicas: Resignificación, emergencias y praxis educativa ed Hernández J (Maracaibo: Ediciones Universidad del Zulia) | spa |
dcterms.references | Calderón D 2005 Dimensión cognitiva y comunicativa de la argumentación en matemáticas (Colombia: Universidad del Valle) | spa |
dcterms.references | Perelman C, Tyteca L 1989 Tratado de la argumentación (Madrid: Editorial Gredos) | spa |
dcterms.references | Duval R 1999 Argumentar, demostrar, explicar: ¿continuidad o ruptura cognitiva? (México: Editorial Iberoamérica) | spa |
dcterms.references | Duval R 1999 Semiosis y pensamiento humano: Registros semióticos y aprendizajes intelectuales (Colombia: Ediciones Universidad del Valle) | spa |
dcterms.references | Pierce C 1974 La ciencia de la semiótica: Colección de semiología y epistemología (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión) | spa |
dcterms.references | Duval R 1999 Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking, basic issues for learning Proccedings of the Annual Meeting North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Washington: Educational Resources Information Center) p 25 | eng |
dcterms.references | Krabbe E 2009 Cooperation and competition in argumentative exchanges Rhetoric and argumentation in the beginning of the XXIst century ed Ribeiro H (Brasil: Universidad de Coimbra) 6 111 | eng |
dcterms.references | León O, Calderón D 2003 Argumentar y validar en matemáticas: ¿Una relación necesaria? Hacia una comprensión del desarrollo de competencias argumentativas en matemáticas (Colombia: Ediciones Universidad del Valle) | spa |
dcterms.references | Florez M, Salazar J, Hernández Y, Gelvez E, Garavito J, Florez S, Hernández A, Patiño D 2018 Henry A. Giroux and his contributions to the modeling of critical curriculum: questions and reflections Revista Espacios 39(5) 4 | eng |
dcterms.references | Simons H 2011 El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica (Madrid: Editorial Morata) | spa |
dcterms.references | Strauss A, Corbin J 1998 Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (USA: Sage Publications) | eng |
oaire.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | eng |