Perspectiva jurídica de la sustitución de una medida privativa de la libertad por una no privativa por los jueces de control de garantías en Colombia a partir de la Ley 906 del 2004
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Baldovino Morales, Oscar Gustavo
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente ensayo de grado tiene como fin realizar un análisis del Artículo 307 de la Ley 906 de 2004 (Código de Procedimiento Penal), que comenta acerca de la medida de aseguramiento privativa de la libertad y no privativa de la libertad. En este mismo se adiciona el parágrafo 1 que establece el límite que un individuo debe tener una medida de aseguramiento privativa de la libertad. Lo anterior con el fin de no violar el derecho al debido, el derecho a la libertad a la que tiene todo ser humano. También nos dice que es el Juez de Garantía el encargado de impartir justicia. Siendo la tesis fundamental en este ensayo es abordar la aplicación irregular de la medida privativa de la libertad por una no privativa de la libertad por parte de los jueces de garantía, quienes no le dan la aplicación adecuada a este parágrafo, vulnerando los derechos de un procesado y poniendo en riesgo a la misma justicia y la confianza de las personas del común en las instituciones del Estado. Para recoger la información se recurre a la misma Ley, jurisprudencias, sentencia, estudios de personas especializadas en el tema, conferencias, artículos de revista y artículos en la web. Como resultado de este análisis se evidencia que hay una necesidad de revisar la ley por parte del poder legislativo con el fin que sea clara, precisa y fácil de aplicar por parte del togado. También es necesario que, en la revisión de la ley estudien la situación de la medida de aseguramiento, porque esta no se debe ubicar como una medida genérica sino por el contrario debe responder a casos particulares, de acuerdo a cada caso. Con base a lo anterior se realiza un aporte a la vida jurídica de nuestro país, en pos de mejorar la aplicación de la ley, cumplir con el debido proceso y lo más importante sin vulnerar el derecho a la libertad que tiene todo individuo hasta que se le compruebe su culpabilidad.
The purpose of this degree essay is to carry out an analysis of Article 307 of Law 906 of 2004 (Code of Criminal Procedure), which comments on the measure of custodial and non-custodial assurance. In this same paragraph 1 is added that establishes the limit that an individual must have a custodial security measure. The foregoing in order not to violate the right to due, the right to freedom that every human being has. It also tells us that the Guarantee Judge is in charge of dispensing justice. Being the fundamental thesis in this essay is to address the irregular application of the deprivation of liberty measure by a non-custodial one by the guarantee judges, who do not give the proper application to this paragraph, violating the rights of a prosecuted and putting at risk justice itself and the trust of ordinary people in the institutions of the State. To collect the information, the same Law, jurisprudence, sentence, studies of people specialized in the subject, conferences, magazine articles and articles on the web are used. As a result of this analysis, it is evident that there is a need to review the law on the part of the legislative branch in order to make it clear, precise and easy for the togado to apply. It is also necessary that, in the review of the law, they study the situation of the insurance measure, because it should not be located as a generic measure but, on the contrary, must respond to particular cases, according to each case. Based on the above, a contribution is made to the legal life of our country, in order to improve the application of the law, comply with due process and most importantly without violating the right to freedom that every individual has until it is prove your guilt.
The purpose of this degree essay is to carry out an analysis of Article 307 of Law 906 of 2004 (Code of Criminal Procedure), which comments on the measure of custodial and non-custodial assurance. In this same paragraph 1 is added that establishes the limit that an individual must have a custodial security measure. The foregoing in order not to violate the right to due, the right to freedom that every human being has. It also tells us that the Guarantee Judge is in charge of dispensing justice. Being the fundamental thesis in this essay is to address the irregular application of the deprivation of liberty measure by a non-custodial one by the guarantee judges, who do not give the proper application to this paragraph, violating the rights of a prosecuted and putting at risk justice itself and the trust of ordinary people in the institutions of the State. To collect the information, the same Law, jurisprudence, sentence, studies of people specialized in the subject, conferences, magazine articles and articles on the web are used. As a result of this analysis, it is evident that there is a need to review the law on the part of the legislative branch in order to make it clear, precise and easy for the togado to apply. It is also necessary that, in the review of the law, they study the situation of the insurance measure, because it should not be located as a generic measure but, on the contrary, must respond to particular cases, according to each case. Based on the above, a contribution is made to the legal life of our country, in order to improve the application of the law, comply with due process and most importantly without violating the right to freedom that every individual has until it is prove your guilt.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Medida de aseguramiento, Libertad, Debido proceso, Justicia, Assurance measure, Freedom, Due process, Justice