Doctrina probable como elemento imprescindible para fundamentar una decisión judicial en Barranquilla durante los años 2015-2018
Cargando...
Fecha
2019
Autores
Pájaro Guardo, Alvaro
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
La obligatoriedad de la doctrina probable busca la materialización de la igualdad de trato de todas las personas ante la ley por parte de las autoridades, así mismo la seguridad jurídica, toda vez que el individuo tiene derecho que a futuro se decida en el mismo sentido sus disposiciones jurídicas; así como también el acceso a la justicia de todos en igualdad de condiciones, tal y como lo estableció la Corte Constitucional en sentencia C- 621 de 2015 en la cual le procuró el fundamento en el “derecho de los ciudadanos a que las decisiones judiciales se funden en una interpretación uniforme y consistente del ordenamiento jurídico”
Muchos juristas desconocen el concepto de doctrina probable y precedente judicial, constituyéndose en la actualidad en elementos fundamentales para garantizar la igualdad de todas las personas ante la Ley y el verdadero acceso a la administración de justicia. Con su desconocimiento se podría ver afectada notoriamente la seguridad jurídica que el Estado está obligado a garantizar a sus ciudadanos.
Es por ello, que se debe concebir la doctrina probable como elemento imprescindible para fundamentar una decisión judicial toda vez que ésta debe ser utilizada por la autoridad
para salvaguardar los principios de igualdad, seguridad jurídica, buena fe y autonomía judicial.
The obligatory nature of the probable doctrine seeks the materialization of the equal treatment of all persons before the law by the authorities, as well as legal certainty, since the individual has the right to decide in the future in the same sense their legal provisions; as well as access to justice for all on equal terms, as established by the Constitutional Court in judgment C-621 of 2015 in which he was based on the “right of citizens to judicial decisions to be they merge in a uniform and consistent interpretation of the legal system ” Many jurists are unaware of the concept of probable doctrine and judicial precedent, now constituting fundamental elements to guarantee the equality of all persons before the Law and true access to the administration of justice. With their ignorance, the legal certainty that the State is obliged to guarantee its citizens could be significantly affected. That is why the probable doctrine must be conceived as an essential element to support a judicial decision since it must be used by the authority to safeguard the principles of equality, legal certainty, good faith and judicial autonomy.
The obligatory nature of the probable doctrine seeks the materialization of the equal treatment of all persons before the law by the authorities, as well as legal certainty, since the individual has the right to decide in the future in the same sense their legal provisions; as well as access to justice for all on equal terms, as established by the Constitutional Court in judgment C-621 of 2015 in which he was based on the “right of citizens to judicial decisions to be they merge in a uniform and consistent interpretation of the legal system ” Many jurists are unaware of the concept of probable doctrine and judicial precedent, now constituting fundamental elements to guarantee the equality of all persons before the Law and true access to the administration of justice. With their ignorance, the legal certainty that the State is obliged to guarantee its citizens could be significantly affected. That is why the probable doctrine must be conceived as an essential element to support a judicial decision since it must be used by the authority to safeguard the principles of equality, legal certainty, good faith and judicial autonomy.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Doctrina probable, Fuerza vinculante, Precedente, Autonomía judicial, Decisión judicial, Probable doctrine, Binding force, Precedent, Judicial autonomy, Judicial decision