Karl Popper y Heráclito: Antecedentes y problemas actuales de la Filosofía de la Ciencia
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Villalobos Antúnez, José Vicente
Gutiérrez, José Francisco
Ramírez Molina, Reynier Israel
Díaz Cid, Luis
Ramos Márquez, Yanelis
Enamorado-Estrada, Jairo
Ruiz-Gomez, Gladis Isabel
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad del Zulia
Resumen
Se analiza el significado que tienen para la filosofía de la ciencia de Karl Popper las ideas de logos
y cambio de Heráclito de Éfeso. Este autor expone que Heráclito ha sido mal interpretado e
incomprendido, especialmente desde la concepción racionalista crítica, que Popper sitúa en la
ilustración jónica y efesina. Ello ha implicado, según afirma, un desconocimiento de los aportes
para el pensamiento científico de ambas ideas filosóficas, innovadoras y originales en la época
presocrática. Según Popper, Heráclito significó desde entonces, un verdadero enlace con las ideas
innovadoras que sobrevendrían al paso de los siglos, influyendo en desarrollos posteriores de la
ciencia. Este trabajo es un breve estudio de las dos obras con las cuales Popper estudia al Efesino:
Conjeturas y refutaciones (1991) y La sociedad abierta y sus enemigos (1984); sin embargo, se
hacen algunas conexiones con el resto de su obra, para concluir que Popper basa su racionalismo
científico crítico en el racionalismo crítico de la primera ilustración griega.
This essay discusses the meaning of Hereaclitus logo and change ideas for Karl Popper's philosophy of science. The author explains that Heraclitus has been misinterpreted and misunderstood, especially since the critical rationalist conception, which Popper places in the Ionian and Ephesian illustration. This has certainly involved, according to the Austrian author, a lack of knowledge of the contributions to scientific thinking of both philosophical, innovative and original ideas in the pre-Socratic era. According to Popper, Heraclito meant for the future of science and philosophy, a true link with the innovative ideas that came over the centuries, issues that influenced later developments of science. This work is a brief study of the two works with which Popper studies Ephesio: Conjectures and Refutations (1991) and The Open Society and Its Enemies (1984); however, some connections are made with the rest of his work, concluding that Popper bases his critical scientific rationalism on the critical rationalism of the first Greek illustration.
This essay discusses the meaning of Hereaclitus logo and change ideas for Karl Popper's philosophy of science. The author explains that Heraclitus has been misinterpreted and misunderstood, especially since the critical rationalist conception, which Popper places in the Ionian and Ephesian illustration. This has certainly involved, according to the Austrian author, a lack of knowledge of the contributions to scientific thinking of both philosophical, innovative and original ideas in the pre-Socratic era. According to Popper, Heraclito meant for the future of science and philosophy, a true link with the innovative ideas that came over the centuries, issues that influenced later developments of science. This work is a brief study of the two works with which Popper studies Ephesio: Conjectures and Refutations (1991) and The Open Society and Its Enemies (1984); however, some connections are made with the rest of his work, concluding that Popper bases his critical scientific rationalism on the critical rationalism of the first Greek illustration.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Heráclito, Karl R. Popper, Logos, Cambio, Ciencias sociales, Método científico, Change, Social sciences, Scientific method