Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Urango, Hannia
dc.contributor.authorInturri, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorLe Pira, Michela
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Melón, Mónica
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T17:05:43Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T17:05:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn19435444
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/5685
dc.description.abstractThe design of accessible walking routes needs to take into account the different stakeholders’ preferences and factors affecting walking. It is a complex issue which policy-makers should deal with to foster sustainable mobility. A participatory multicriteria decision analysis approach is presented to help the planning and designing of pedestrian routes, based on a sound analysis of factors affecting walking behavior and the attributes of the roads, and a stakeholder-driven evaluation of the same. A group of different stakeholders has been involved to select the criteria for designing pedestrian routes in the city center of Cartagena (Colombia). Some of them have been selected based on the results of a social network analysis (SNA) to be involved as key stakeholders for the evaluation of the selected criteria through an analytic network process (ANP). An index to measure the importance of each criterion in designing pedestrian routes has been obtained. Results provide valuable inputs to understand how to redesign and reconfigure streets for pedestrians in a city so as to improve walkability and foster a shift toward active and sustainable transport modes.eng
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherASCE American Society of Civil Engineerseng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Urban Planning and Developmenteng
dc.sourceVol. 146, No. 3 (2020)
dc.subjectAnalytic network processeng
dc.subjectStakeholder analysiseng
dc.subjectPedestrian route designeng
dc.subjectPedestrian mobilityeng
dc.subjectPedestrian accessibilityeng
dc.subjectUrban walkabilityeng
dc.titlePlanning for Pedestrians with a participatory multicriteria approacheng
dc.typearticleeng
dcterms.referencesAghaabbasi, M., M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, and M. Z. Shah. 2019. “The equitable use concept in sidewalk design.” Cities 88: 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2018.10.010.eng
dcterms.referencesAghaabbasi, M., M. Moeinaddini, M. Zaly Shah, and Z. Asadi-Shekari. 2017. “A new assessment model to evaluate the microscale sidewalk design factors at the neighbourhood level.” J. Transp. Health 5: 97– 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012.spa
dcterms.referencesArranz-López, A., J. A. Soria-Lara, C. López-Escolano, and Á Pueyo Campos. 2017. “Retail Mobility Environments: A methodological framework for integrating retail activity and non-motorised accessibility in Zaragoza, Spain.” J. Transp. Geogr. 58: 92–103. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.010.eng
dcterms.referencesBarba-Romero, S., and J.-C. Pomerol. 1997. Decisiones multicriterio : Fundamentos teóricos y utilización práctica. Alcalá de Henares, Spain: Universidad de Alcalá.spa
dcterms.referencesBelton, V., and T. J. Stewart. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis. Boston: Springer.eng
dcterms.referencesBentley, R., D. Jolley, and A. M. Kavanagh. 2010. “Local environments as determinants of walking in Melbourne, Australia.” Soc. Sci. Med. 70 (11): 1806–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.041.eng
dcterms.referencesBlečić, I., A. Cecchini, T. Congiu, G. Fancello, and G. A. Trunfio. 2015. “Evaluating walkability: A capability-wise planning and design support system.” Int. J. Geog. Inform. Sci. 29 (8): 1350–1374. https://doi.org/10 .1080/13658816.2015.1026824.eng
dcterms.referencesBlecic, I., A. Cecchini, and G. A. Trunfio. 2015. “Towards a design support system for urban walkability.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 51 (1): 2157– 2167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.489.eng
dcterms.referencesBodin, Ö, and B. I. Crona. 2009. “The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?” Glob. Environ. Change 19 (3): 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .gloenvcha.2009.05.002.eng
dcterms.referencesBodin, Ö, B. I. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2006. “Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective?” Ecol. Soc. 11 (2): r2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01808-1102r02.eng
dcterms.referencesBorgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard,MA: Analytic Technologies.eng
dcterms.referencesBryson, J. M. 2004. “What to do when stakeholders matter.” Public Manage. Rev. 6 (1): 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722.eng
dcterms.referencesCambra, P. 2012. “Pedestrian accessibility and attractiveness indicators for walkability assessment.” Master thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Technical Institute of Lisbon.eng
dcterms.referencesCaprì, S., M. Ignaccolo, G. Inturri, and M. Le Pira. 2016. “Green walking networks for climate change adaptation.” Transp. Res. Part D 45: 84– 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.005.eng
dcterms.referencesCartagena Cómo Vamos. 2018. “Informe de Calidad de Vida 2017.” [Quality of Life Report 2017] [In Spanish.] Accessed April 17, 2018. http://www.cartagenacomovamos.org/nuevo/wp-content/uploads/2014 /11/Presentacion-Calidad-de-Vida-2017-FINAL.pdf.eng
dcterms.referencesCascetta, E., A. Cartenì, F. Pagliara, and M. Montanino. 2015. “A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods.” Transp. Policy 38: 27–39. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.005.eng
dcterms.referencesCervero, R., O. L. Sarmiento, E. Jacoby, L. F. Gomez, and A. Neiman. 2009. “Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 3 (4): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314.eng
dcterms.referencesChang, K.-L. 2013. “Combined MCDM approaches for century-old Taiwanese food firm new product development project selection.” Br. Food J. 115 (8): 1197–1210. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2011-0204.eng
dcterms.referencesCheshmehzangi, A., and S. M. Thomas. 2016. “Prioritizing accessible transit systems for sustainable urban development: Understanding and evaluating the parameters of a transportation system in Mumbai.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (4): 05016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP .1943-5444.0000338.eng
dcterms.referencesFichera, A.,M. Frasca, V. Palermo, and R. Volpe. 2018. “An optimization tool for the assessment of urban energy scenarios.” Energy 156: 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.114.eng
dcterms.referencesGaldini, R. 2019. “Urban re-use practices in contemporary cities: Experiences in Europe.” Cities 87: 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.026.eng
dcterms.referencesGant, R. 1997. “Pedestrianisation and disabled people: A study of personal mobility in Kingston town centre.” Disability Soc. 12 (5): 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727010.eng
dcterms.referencesGehl, J. 2010. Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.eng
dcterms.referencesGlicken, J. 2000. “Getting stakeholder participation “right”: A discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls.” Environ. Sci. Policy 3 (6): 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00105-2.eng
dcterms.referencesGonzalez-Urango, H., and M. García-Melón. 2018. “Stakeholder engagement to evaluate tourist development plans with a sustainable approach.” Sustainable Dev. 26 (6): 800–811. https://doi.org/10 .1002/sd.1849.eng
dcterms.referencesGuo, Z., and B. P. Y. Loo. 2013. “Pedestrian environment and route choice: Evidence from New York City and Hong Kong.” J. Transp. Geogr. 28: 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013.eng
dcterms.referencesHanneman, R. A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: Univ. of California.eng
dcterms.referencesHickman, R., and D. Banister. 2014. Transport, climate change and the city. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesHuff Herbie, K., and R. Liggett. 2014. The highway capacity manual’s method for calculating bicycle and pedestrian levels of service: The ultimate white paper. Oxford, UK: Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.eng
dcterms.referencesIgnaccolo, M., G. Inturri, M. García-Melón, N. Giuffrida, M. Le Pira, and V. Torrisi. 2017. “Combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with role-playing games for stakeholder engagement in complex transport decision.” Transp. Res. Procedia 27: 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.trpro.2017.12.069.eng
dcterms.referencesIgnaccolo, M., G. Inturri, M. Le Pira, S. Caprì, and V. Mancuso. 2016. “Evaluating the role of land use and transport policies in reducing the transport energy dependence of a city.” Res. Transp. Econ. 55: 60– 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.011.spa
dcterms.referencesJabbari, M., F. Fonseca, and R. Ramos. 2017. “Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: The case of Oporto.” J. Urban Des. 23 (1): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574 809.2017.1343087.eng
dcterms.referencesKadali, B. R., and P. Vedagiri. 2016. “Review of pedestrian level of service.” Transp. Res. Record 2581 (1): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.3141 /2581-05.eng
dcterms.referencesKalakou, S., and F. Moura. 2014. “Bridging the gap in planning indoor pedestrian facilities.” Transp. Rev. 34 (4): 474–500. https://doi.org/10 .1080/01441647.2014.915441.eng
dcterms.referencesKim, H. Y., D. Wunneburger, M. Neuman, and S. Y. An. 2014. “Optimizing high-speed rail routes using a spatial decision support system (SDSS): The texas urban triangle (TUT) case.” J. Transp. Geogr. 34: 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.014.eng
dcterms.referencesLe Pira, M. 2018. “Transport planning with stakeholders: An agent-based modelling approach.” Int. J. Transp. Econ. 45 (1): 15–32. https://doi .org/10.19272/201806701002.eng
dcterms.referencesLe Pira, M., G. Inturri, M. Ignaccolo, A. Pluchino, and A. Rapisarda. 2017. “Finding shared decisions in stakeholder networks: An agentbased approach.” Physica A 466: 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .physa.2016.09.015.eng
dcterms.referencesLiao, S.-K., Y.-C. Chen, K.-L. Chang, and T.-W. Tseng. 2011. “Assessing the performance of Taiwanese tour guides.” Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 5 (4): 1325–1333. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.871.eng
dcterms.referencesLigardo-Herrera, I., T. Gómez-Navarro, and H. Gonzalez-Urango. 2019. “Application of the ANP to the prioritization of project stakeholders in the context of responsible research and innovation.” Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 27 (3): 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0573-4.eng
dcterms.referencesLoken, E. 2007. “Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 11 (7): 1584– 1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005.eng
dcterms.referencesLotfi, S., and M. J. Koohsari. 2011. “Neighborhood walkability in a city within a developing country.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (4): 402– 408.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000085.eng
dcterms.referencesMateo-Babiano, I. 2016. “Pedestrian’s needs matters: Examining Manila’s walking environment.” Transp. Policy 45: 107–115. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008.eng
dcterms.referencesMayor of London. 2005. “Transport for London: Improving walkability.” September 29, 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesMonteiro, M., and P. Odete. 2015. “Competitividade de destinos turísticos: O caso das ilhas de Cabo Verde.” Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 13: 875–896.spa
dcterms.referencesMoura, F., P. Cambra, and A. B. Gonçalves. 2017. “Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon.” Landscape Urban Plann. 157: 282–296. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002.eng
dcterms.referencesMunicipality of Cartagena de Indias. 2014. “Plan Sectorial de Turismo Cartagena de Indias 2016-2019.” [Tourism Plan of Cartagena de Indias 2016-2019] [In Spanish.] Municipality of Cartagena, Accessed June 20, 2017. http://sigob.cartagena.gov.co/Pd2016/Anexo 6 Plan Sectorial de Turismo.pdf.spa
dcterms.referencesNewman, L., and A. Dale. 2007. “Homophily and agency: Creating effective sustainable development networks.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 9 (1): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5.eng
dcterms.referencesNuworsoo, C., and E. Cooper. 2013. “Considerations for integrating bicycling and walking facilities into urban infrastructure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2393 (1): 125–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-14.eng
dcterms.referencesOswald Beiler, M. R., M. Asce, B. Phillips, and S. M. Asce. 2015. “Prioritizing pedestrian corridors using walkability performance metrics and decision analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (1): 04015009. https:// doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000290.eng
dcterms.referencesPage, S. 2009. Transport and tourism: Global perspectives. London: Pearson Education.eng
dcterms.referencesParajuli, A., and D. Pojani. 2018. “Barriers to the pedestrianization of city centres: Perspectives from the Global North and the Global South.” J. Urban Des. 23 (1): 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080 /13574809.2017.1369875.eng
dcterms.referencesPark, S., K. Choi, and J. S. Lee. 2017. “Operationalization of path walkability for sustainable transportation.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 11 (7): 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1226996.eng
dcterms.referencesPedestrian Quality Needs Project. 2010. COST 358 Pedestrians’ quality needs perceived needs PQN final report—Part B2: Documentation. Cheltenham, UK: WALK21.eng
dcterms.referencesPrell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. “Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management.” Soc. Nat. Resourc. 22 (6): 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202.eng
dcterms.referencesRahman, K., N. Abdul Ghani, A. Abdulbasah Kamil, A. Mustafa, and M. A. Kabir Chowdhury. 2013. “Modelling pedestrian travel time and the design of facilities: A queuing approach.” PLoS One 8 (5): e63503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063503.eng
dcterms.referencesReed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. “Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.” J. Environ. Manage. 90 (5): 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.jenvman.2009.01.001.eng
dcterms.referencesRobledo, S., G. A. Osorio, and C. López. 2014. “Networking en pequeña empresa: Una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoria de grafos.” Revista Vínculos 11 (2): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.14483/issn.2322-939X.spa
dcterms.referencesSaaty, T. L. 1990. “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 (1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377 -2217(90)90057-I.eng
dcterms.referencesSaaty, T. L. 2001. The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh: RWS.eng
dcterms.referencesSaaty, T. L., and K. Peniwati. 2008. Group decision making : Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh: RWS.eng
dcterms.referencesSahani, R., and P. K. Bhuyan. 2013. “Level of service criteria of off-street pedestrian facilities in Indian context using affinity propagation clustering.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 104: 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .sbspro.2013.11.166.eng
dcterms.referencesSahelgozin, M., A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, and S. Dareshiri. 2015. “Proposing a multi-criteria path optimization method in order to provide a Ubiquitous Pedestrian Wayfinding Service.” ISPRS 40 (1W5): 639–644. https://doi .org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-639-2015.eng
dcterms.referencesSaint Ville, A. S., G. M. Hickey, and L. E. Phillip. 2017. “How do stakeholder interactions influence national food security policy in the Caribbean? The case of Saint Lucia.” Food Policy 68: 53–64. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.002.eng
dcterms.referencesSantos, G., H. Behrendt, L. Maconi, T. Shirvani, and A. Teytelboym. 2010. “Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport.” Res. Transp. Econ. 28 (1): 2–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2009.11.002.eng
dcterms.referencesSayyadi, G., and A. Awasthi. 2013. “AHP-based approach for location planning of pedestrian zones: Application in Montreal, Canada.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (2): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE .1943-5436.0000493.eng
dcterms.referencesScott, J. 2013. Social network analysis. London: SAGE.eng
dcterms.referencesShoup, D. C. 2011. The high cost of free parking. Washington, DC: Planners Press, American Planning Association.eng
dcterms.referencesSingh, B., and M. M. Keitsch. 2016. “Cultural sustainability and space—A comparison of two cases in Kathmandu, Nepal.” Sustainable Dev. 24 (5): 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1631.eng
dcterms.referencesSingh, R. 2016. “Factors affecting walkability of neighborhoods.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 216: 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .sbspro.2015.12.048.eng
dcterms.referencesSipahi, S., and M. Timor. 2010. “The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications.” Manage. Decis. 48 (5): 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920.eng
dcterms.referencesSisiopiku, V., J. Byrd, and A. Chittoor. 2007. “Application of level-of-service methods for evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2002 (1): 117–124. https://doi.org/10 .3141/2002-15.eng
dcterms.referencesSoleimani, N., and C. Valmohammadi. 2017. “Identifying and prioritizing factors influencing the selection of the top suppliers of e-procurement using FDEMATEL and FANP.” J. Multi Criteria Decis. Anal. 24 (5–6): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1619.eng
dcterms.referencesSouthworth, M. 2005. “Designing the Walkable City.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (4): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488 (2005)131:4(246).eng
dcterms.referencesTalavera-Garcia, R., and J. A. Soria-Lara. 2015. “Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality.” Cities 45: 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003.eng
dcterms.referencesTaleai, M., and E. Taheri Amiri. 2017. “Spatial multi-criteria and multiscale evaluation of walkability potential at street segment level: A case study of Tehran.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 31: 37–50. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.011eng
dcterms.referencesTavana, M., M. Zareinejad, F. J. Santos-Arteaga, and M. A. Kaviani. 2016. “A conceptual analytic network model for evaluating and selecting third-party reverse logistics providers.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86 (5–8): 1705–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8208-6.eng
dcterms.referencesTong, X., Y. Wang, and E. H. W. Chan. 2016. “International research trends and methods for walkability and their enlightenment in China.” Procedia Environ. Sci. 36: 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .proenv.2016.09.023.eng
dcterms.referencesWasserman, S., and K. Faust. 2007. Social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesYamaki, K. 2017. “Applying social network analysis to stakeholder analysis in Japan’s natural resource governance: Two endangered species conservation activity cases.” J. Forest Res. 22 (2): 83–90. https://doi .org/10.1080/13416979.2017.1279706.eng
dcterms.referencesYang, R. J. 2014. “An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (5): 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .ijproman.2013.10.011.eng
dcterms.referencesZegeer, C. V., and M. Bushell. 2012. “Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 44 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.007.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
oaire.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.driverarticleeng
dc.identifier.doihttps://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000585


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos científicos evaluados por pares

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional