Análisis de la diligencia del artículo 237 del código de procedimiento penal frente al derecho de igualdad de armas de las partes
Cargando...
Fecha
2019
Autores
Quintero Ariza, Hugo Raúl
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El principio procesal y garantía judicial de igualdad de armas es un instrumento jurídico del sistema penal oral acusatorio colombiano, que establece que el enfrentamiento entre la acusación y defensa para establecer la responsabilidad penal de un individuo debe de ser efectuado garantizando la igualdad de estrategias de ataque y defensa de las partes, por lo tanto cualquier circunstancia que represente un desequilibrio sobre la postura de uno de los participantes y lo coloque en una situación injusta de desventaja frente a la otra resulta inadmisible e incompatibles con los principios que se profesan en la doctrina del derecho adversarial.
Con fundamento en esto el presente trabajo se propuso como objetivo Identificar la violación del principio de igualdad de armas como consecuencia de la exigencia de asistencia física del acusado en las audiencia de legalización del material probatorio obtenido en allanamientos con posteridad a la imputación de cargos, lo anterior en
el entendido que existe un deterioro para los intereses del ente acusador cuando se cita al procesado para la legalización de elementos materiales probatorios con posteridad a la formulación de imputación, diligencia en la cual el código de procedimiento penal ordena que sea efectuada con la presencia física del imputado, esto es producto de las fallas logísticas del instituto nacional penitenciario y carcelario en su negligencia para transportar eficaz y oportunamente a los reclusos a sus respectivas audiencias, a tal efecto ante este evento la fiscalía general de la nación corre el riesgo de perder la mencionada prueba por circunstancias ajenas a su voluntad y actividad judicial, colocando el peligro el éxito de su teoría del caso.
The procedural principle and judicial guarantee of equality of arms is a legal instrument of the Colombian oral accusatory criminal system, which establishes that the confrontation between the accusation and defense to establish the criminal responsibility of an individual must be carried out guaranteeing equality of attack strategies and defense of the parties, therefore any circumstance that represents an imbalance on the position of one of the participants and places it in an unfair situation of disadvantage compared to the other is inadmissible and incompatible with the principles that are professed in the doctrine of the adversarial law. Based on this the present work was proposed as an objective to identify the violation of the principle of equality of arms as a consequence of the requirement of physical assistance of the defendant in the hearing of legalization of probative material obtained in searches with posterity to the imputation of charges; previous in the understanding that there is a deterioration for the interests of the accusing body when the defendant is summoned for the legalization of probative material elements after the formulation of imputation, diligence in which the code of criminal procedure orders that it be effected with the presence physical of the accused, this is the product of the logistical failures of the national penitentiary and prison institute in its negligence to transport effectively and timely the inmates to their respective audiences, for this purpose before this event the general prosecution of the nation runs the risk of losing the aforementioned proof by other circumstances s to his will and judicial activity, placing the danger of the success of his theory of the case.
The procedural principle and judicial guarantee of equality of arms is a legal instrument of the Colombian oral accusatory criminal system, which establishes that the confrontation between the accusation and defense to establish the criminal responsibility of an individual must be carried out guaranteeing equality of attack strategies and defense of the parties, therefore any circumstance that represents an imbalance on the position of one of the participants and places it in an unfair situation of disadvantage compared to the other is inadmissible and incompatible with the principles that are professed in the doctrine of the adversarial law. Based on this the present work was proposed as an objective to identify the violation of the principle of equality of arms as a consequence of the requirement of physical assistance of the defendant in the hearing of legalization of probative material obtained in searches with posterity to the imputation of charges; previous in the understanding that there is a deterioration for the interests of the accusing body when the defendant is summoned for the legalization of probative material elements after the formulation of imputation, diligence in which the code of criminal procedure orders that it be effected with the presence physical of the accused, this is the product of the logistical failures of the national penitentiary and prison institute in its negligence to transport effectively and timely the inmates to their respective audiences, for this purpose before this event the general prosecution of the nation runs the risk of losing the aforementioned proof by other circumstances s to his will and judicial activity, placing the danger of the success of his theory of the case.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Igualdad de armas, Imputación fáctica, Allanamiento, Desventaja, Equality of arms, Factual imputation, Acquiescence, Disadvantage
