Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorChacón C., Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorPadilla V., Ever
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T15:11:08Z
dc.date.available2019-09-20T15:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/4007
dc.description.abstractLa investigación realizada tuvo como finalidad el estudio de la percepción de los estudiantes universitarios del área de ciencias básicas medicas, de la asignatura fundamentos de anatomía en el programa de medicina en una universidad de carácter privado de la ciudad de Barranquilla, sobre la incorporación de elementos tecnológicos tales como dispositivos móviles y realidad aumentada mediadores en su proceso de aprendizaje. Se empleó el método asociado a los estudios de corte cualitativo con diseño fenomenológico, este tipo de enfoque metodológico fue escogido dada su orientación y centro en la exploración descripción y comprensión que los individuos tienen en torno a su experiencia con un determinado fenómeno, la forma en que lo asimilan: sentimientos, emociones, razonamientos, visiones y percepciones. Para la muestra se conformó un grupo intencional de quince estudiantes activos matriculados en segundo semestre del programa de medicina de la Universidad Simón Bolívar, cuya estructura curricular e intensidad horaria fuera equivalente. Los criterios adicionales de selección se centraron en el interés manifestado por el estudiante para participar en el experimento; no fue tomado como criterio el rendimiento académico, grupal o individual de los estudiantes.spa
dc.description.abstractThe research carried out was aimed at the study of the perception of university students in the area of basic medical sciences, of the subject of anatomy in the medicine program at a private university in the city of Barranquilla, on the incorporation of elements technological such as mobile devices and augmented reality mediators in their learning process. The method associated with qualitative studies with phenomenological design was used, this type of methodological approach was chosen given its orientation and center in the exploration description and understanding that individuals have around their experience with a certain phenomenon, the way in which that assimilate it: feelings, emotions, reasoning, visions and perceptions. For the sample, an intentional group of fifteen active students enrolled in the second semester of the Simón Bolívar University medical program was formed, whose curricular structure and hourly intensity were equivalent. Additional selection criteria focused on the interest expressed by the student to participate in the experiment; The academic, group or individual performance of the students was not taken as criteria.eng
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad Simón Bolívarspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDispositivos móvilesspa
dc.subjectAprendizaje móvilspa
dc.subjectEducaciónspa
dc.subjectRealidad aumentadaspa
dc.subjectMediación tecnológicaspa
dc.subjectMobile deviceseng
dc.subjectMobile learningeng
dc.subjectEducationeng
dc.subjectAugmented realityeng
dc.subjectTechnological mediationeng
dc.titleEstudio de la percepción en estudiantes universitarios sobre la aplicación de mediación tecnológica basada en m-learning y realidad amentada en su proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje en la asignatura anatomía del área de ciencias básicas medicasspa
dc.typeOtherspa
dcterms.referencesAlcará, A. R. & Dos Santos,A (2013). Comprension de lectura, Estratégias de Aprendizage y Motivacion en estudiantes universitarios. Psi- co, 44 (3), 411-420. Recuperado de: http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/ index.php/revistapsico/article/view/12258/10416spa
dcterms.referencesAllen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.465.eng
dcterms.referencesArias, C. (2007). Estado del arte de las investigaciones sobre didácticas para la formación de competencias comunicativas en Facultades de Educación de Universidades de Bogotá́, en el período 2000 y 2005. I Encuentro Nacional de Discusión sobre Políticas Institucionales para el Desarrollo de la Lectura y la Escritura en la Educación Superior. ASCUN y Red Nacional de Discusión sobre Lectura y Escritura en Educación Superior. Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Bogotá́, 26 y 27 de abril.spa
dcterms.referencesAziz, M. A.; McKenzie, J. C.; Wilson, J. S. et al. (2002). The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics.Anat Rec.,268-269.eng
dcterms.referencesAzuma, R., Billinghurst, M. y Klinker, G. (2011). Special section on mobile augmented reality. Computers y graphics- uk.eng
dcterms.referencesBallesteros, L. A., Reguera, A., & Sosa de Montyn, S. (2006). Historias de escritura de estudiantes universitarios: la construcción de sí como escritor. ponencia presentada en las Jornadas de Lectura y Escritura del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.spa
dcterms.referencesBarletta N., Chamorro D. (2011), El texto escolar y el aprendizaje: Enredos y desenredos (pp. 15-25). Barranquilla: Ediciones Uninorte.spa
dcterms.referencesBennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology, 39(5), 775-786.eng
dcterms.referencesBull, G., Garofalo, J., & Harris, J. (2002). Grand challenges: Preparing for the technological tipping point. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(8), 6–12.eng
dcterms.referencesBharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32(2), 205-214.eng
dcterms.referencesBrand, J., & Kinash, S. (2010). Pedagogy: A quasi-experimental and ethnographic pilot test of the iPad in a blended mobile learning environment. Proceedings Ascilite Sydney 2010, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-011-9217-4.eng
dcterms.referencesBonilla, E., & Rodríguez, P. (2005). Más allá del dilema de los métodos: la investigación en ciencias sociales. CEDE, Facultad de Economia, Universidad de los Andes.spa
dcterms.referencesBrand, J., Kinash, S., Mathew, T., & Kordyban, R. (2011). iWant does not equal iWill: Correlates of mobile learning with iPads, e-textbooks, BlackBoard Mobile Learn and a blended learning experience. Ascilite 2011, (2007), 168–178.eng
dcterms.referencesCalabria, Y., Prado, A. & Riátiga, R. (2007). Incidencia de un programa de lectura relacionado con el nivel critico intertextual en estudiantes universitarios. Perspectivas sobre la enseñanza de la legua materna, las lenguas y la literatura, Cali, Universidad del Valle.spa
dcterms.referencesCamargo, Z., Uribe, G., Caro, M. y Castrillón, C. (2008). Estado del arte de las concepciones sobre practicas de lectura y escritura en la Universidad Colombiana. Ministerio de Educación Nacional y Universidad del Quindío.spa
dcterms.referencesCarlino, P. (2006). La escritura en la investigación.spa
dcterms.referencesCalderón-Ibáñez, A., & Quijano-Peñuela, J. (2010). Características de comprensión lectora en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Estudios socio-jurídicos, 12(1), 337-364.spa
dcterms.referencesCamacho, M., & Tiscar, L. (2011). M-learning en España, Portugal y América Latina. SCOPEO Observatorio de La Formación En Red, 181.spa
dcterms.referencesCobo, B. a L., & Moravec, J. W. (2011). Aprendizaje invisible, 43, 240. Recuperado de: http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/144375%5Cn http://www.publicacions.ub.edu/ver_indice.asp?archivo=07458.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesCota, C. X. N., Díaz, A. I. M., & Duque, M. Á. R. (2014). Evaluation framework for learning mobile systems : Current situation and proposal. Interaccion’14, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662253.2662265.eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. (2013). Qualitive Investigación y Diseño de la investigación. Capitulo: Data Collection 7. (pp.145 - 177)spa
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. (1998). Research Design - Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Capitulo 3 (pp 65-101)eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J., E. Hanson, W., L. Clark Plano, V., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative Research Designs Selection and Implementation. In The Counseling Psychologist (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390eng
dcterms.referencesCharmaz, K., & McMullen, L. M. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. Guilford Press.eng
dcterms.referencesChurchill, D., Fox, B., & King, M. (2012). Study of Affordances of iPads and Teachers’ Private Theories. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2(3), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.122.eng
dcterms.referencesChristie, F. & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. Cassell.eng
dcterms.referencesChurchill, E. F., Snowdon, D. N., & Munro, A. J. (2012). Collaborative virtual environments: digital places and spaces for interaction. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dcterms.referencesChen, I-Jung & Chang, Chi-Cheng & Yen, Jung-Chuan. (2012). Effects of presentation mode on mobile language learning: A performance efficiency perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 28. 10.14742/ajet.887.eng
dcterms.referencesChen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.eng
dcterms.referencesChu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science course. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.eng
dcterms.referencesCuadrado, E., Durango, Z., Menco, L., & Quant, J. M, Rojas, D.(2013). Informe preliminar de la investigación: niveles de comprensión lectora de los estudiantes de la Corporación Universitaria Rafael Núñez (CURN)//Preliminary report of the research: reading comprehension levels of students of the University Corporation Rafael Nunez (CURN). Hexágono Pedagógico, 4(1), 63-73.spa
dcterms.referencesCollins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1980). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 182.eng
dcterms.referencesDavis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.eng
dcterms.referencesDanaher, Patrick & Gururajan, Raj & Hafeez-Baig, Abdul. (2009). Transforming the Practice of Mobile Learning. Promoting pedagogical innovation through educational principles and strategies that work. Innovative Mobile Learning: Techniques and Technologies. Innovative Mobile Learning, (August 2015), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-062-2.ch002.eng
dcterms.referencesDesinano, N. B. (2009). Renarración y reelaboración de textos narrativos. Signo y seña, (8), 237-267. Espa
dcterms.referencesEllis, R. Goodyear, P. (2010). Blended learning in higher education. How students perceive integration of face-to-face and online learning experiences in a foreign policy course. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy and A. Lichtenberg (Eds.) Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education, 33 (pp. 73–81).eng
dcterms.referencesEllis, H. (2001). Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin. Anat.,149-151.eng
dcterms.referencesEscobar, R., Ausecha, R., Vesga, J. & Vasco, I. (2008). Leer y escribir desde la interculturalidad: una posibilidad a partir del concepto de literalidad. II Encuentro Nacional y I Internacional sobre Lectura y Escritura en Educación Superior. Bogotá́, 18 y 19 de septiembre.spa
dcterms.referencesEsbensen, B. A., Swane, C. E., Hallberg, I. R., & Thome, B. (2008). Being given a cancer diagnosis in old age: A phe- nomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(3), 393-405. Estienne, V. M. (2006). Enseñar a leer en la universidad. Una responsabilidad compartida.eng
dcterms.referencesFisher, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, h. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213-232.eng
dcterms.referencesGarcía, M. E. C. (2008). La evaluación por competencias en la educación superior. Profesorado. Revista de curriculum y formación de profesorado, 12(3), 1-16.spa
dcterms.referencesGuiraldes, H.; Oddo, H.; Mena, B.; Velasco, N. & Paulos, J. (2001) Enseñanza de la anatomía humana: experiencias y desafíos en una escuela de medicina. Rev. Chil. Anat.,205-12. Recuperado de: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0716-98682001000200013&script=sci_arttext Guevara.spa
dcterms.referencesElizabeth, (2016). Learning: La armonización entre el sistema educativo y las nuevas tecnologías emergentes/The Learning Model Learning mobile: The Harmonization between Education Journals.Epistemopolis.Org.spa
dcterms.referencesGillian, M. M., & Benítez, V. T. (Eds.). (2016). Textos que se leen en la universidad : Una mirada desde los géneros discursivos. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.uninorte.edu.co:2113spa
dcterms.referencesGuerra, J. & Guevara, Y. (2013). Validación de un instrumento para medir comprensión lectora en alumnos universitarios mexicanos. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 18 (2), 277-291.spa
dcterms.referencesGuevara, A., Leiva, J., L., Rossi, C., & Aguayo, A. (2104). Realidad aumentada y sistemas de recomendación grupales: Una nueva perspectiva en sistemas de destinos turísticos. Estudios y Perspectivas En Turismo, 23(1), 40–59. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1851- 17322014000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=esspa
dcterms.referencesHandal, B., MacNish, J., & Petocz, P. (2013). Academics adopting mobile devices: The zone of Haythornthwaite (Eds.). The Sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221-247). London: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesHamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053-1070.eng
dcterms.referencesHergueta-Covacho, E., Marta Lazo, C., & Gabelas Barroso, J. A. (2016). Educación Mediática e InteRmetodología Relacional aplicada a los MOOC.spa
dcterms.referencesHarward, V. J., Alamo, J. A. del, Lerman, S. R., Bailey, P. H., Carpenter, J., DeLong, K., … Zych, D. (2008). The iLab Shared Architecture: A Web Services Infrastructure to Build Communities of Internet Accessible Laboratories. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2008.921607.eng
dcterms.referencesHyland, Ken (2008), "Genre and Academic Writing in the Disciplines", Language Teaching, vol. 41, núm. 4, pp. 543-562eng
dcterms.referencesHmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers and Education, 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001eng
dcterms.referencesHwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.02.eng
dcterms.referencesHusserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to phenomenology. New York: Colliers.eng
dcterms.referencesHammond, M., Howarth, J., Keat, R. 1991. Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwells. (Sección «The Critique of Objective Thought»).eng
dcterms.referencesHsieh, S.W., Jang, Y.R., Hwang, G.J. & Chen, N.S. (2011). Effects of Teaching and Learning Styles on Students' Reflection Levels for Ubiquitous Learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194-1201. Retrieved October 7, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/167309/.eng
dcterms.referencesJamaludin, A., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life. Computers and Education, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.009eng
dcterms.referencesJones, D. G.(1997). Reassessing the importance of dissection: a critique and elaboration. Clin. Anat.,123127. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & and Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. NMC..eng
dcterms.referencesKhadagge, F. & Latterman, C. (2013). iTeach we learn via mobile technologies: A case Study in Business course; Available at: http//.www.editlib.org/p/49581eng
dcterms.referencesKhaddage, F., & Zeidan, F. (2012, September). iPad in higher education:“Ready or not? a college case study in the middle east”. In 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1-3). IEEE.eng
dcterms.referencesKeagen, D. (2005). The Incorporation of Mobile Learning into Mainstream Education and Training. Proceedings of mLearn2005-4th World Conference on learning mobile, Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 October 2005. Recuperado de: http://www.mlearn.org.za /CD/papers/keegan1.pdf.eng
dcterms.referencesKearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K. & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406.eng
dcterms.referencesKearney, M. & Maher, D. (2013). Mobile Learning in Maths Teacher Education: Using iPads to Support PreService Teachers' Professional Development. Australian Educational Computing. 27 (3), pp. 76-84.eng
dcterms.referencesKeskin, N. O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The Current Perspectives, Theories and Practices of Mobile Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 202-208.eng
dcterms.referencesKlopfer, E., K. Squire & H. Jenkins (2002). Environmental detectives PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. Paper presented at International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.eng
dcterms.referencesKlopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives-the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6eng
dcterms.referencesKolb, L. (2011). Adventures with cell phones. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ991839.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesKoole, M. L. M. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education …, 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.eng
dcterms.referencesKukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers, Routledge, 2005. 192 Pages. ISBN 0-415-35740 doi:10.1017/S0958344006230726eng
dcterms.referencesKukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In: Parsons, David ed. Combining E-Learning and Learning mobile: New Applications of Blended Educational Resources. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global), pp. 151–177.eng
dcterms.referencesKvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.spa
dcterms.referencesKneebone, R. (2005). Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Academic medicine, 80(6), 549-553eng
dcterms.referencesLiu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of learning mobile: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018.eng
dcterms.referencesLaurillard, D. (2007). Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Education. 54. 21-39. 10.1007/s10734-006-9044-2.eng
dcterms.referencesLindsay, L. (2016). Transformation of teacher practice using mobile technology with one- to-one classes: Learning mobile pedagogical approaches. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12265.eng
dcterms.referencesLing, R., & Donner, J., (2009). Mobile communication. London: Polity.eng
dcterms.referencesLincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesLópez, I. P., Regueiro, B., Ponte, B., Martínez, S. R., Piñeiro, I., & Valle, A. (2013). Motivación, implicación en los deberes escolares y rendimientos académico. Aula abierta, 41(3), 13-22.spa
dcterms.referencesMartín, S., Diaz, G., San Cristóbal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. In Computers & Education (Vol. 57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003eng
dcterms.referencesMarinakou, E., & Giousmpasoglou, C. (2014). Higher education hospitality programmes in Bahrain: Challenges and Opportunities. Conference Proceedings 32nd EuroCHRIE Conference, Dubai. UAEeng
dcterms.referencesMarinakou, E. & Giousmpasoglou, C. (2014). Learning mobile in higher education in Bahrain: The educators’ view. Proceedings of the, HBMeU Congress 2014: Leading transformation to sustainable excellence. Dubai, UAE.eng
dcterms.referencesMartin J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.eng
dcterms.referencesMartin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.eng
dcterms.referencesMartinez, M. M. (2008). Aprendizaje servicio y responsabilidad social de las universidades. M. Martínez (Ed.). Barcelona: Octaedro-ICE.spa
dcterms.referencesMathias, C., & Rysavy, P. (1994). The ABCs of PCS. Special Focus, Wireless Networks, Network World (Nov. 7, 1994).eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, G. (1965). Moore’s law. Electronics Magazine, 38(8), 114.eng
dcterms.referencesMorales, A. F., & Espinosa, E. B. (2017). Evaluación de la competencia lectora de futuros docentes. Investigaciones sobre lectura, (7), 7-21.spa
dcterms.referencesMoyano, E. I. (2011). Deconstrucción y Edición Conjuntas en la enseñanza de la escritura: La reflexión sobre género y discurso en la formación académica y profesional. Anais VI Simpósio Internacional de Estudos de Gêneros Textuais (SIGET).spa
dcterms.referencesMc Garvey. M. A.; Farrel, T.; Conroy, R. M. et al. (2001). Dissection: a positive experience. Clin. Anat, 227- 230.eng
dcterms.referencesMelhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 22(3), 1-16.eng
dcterms.referencesMujica, A., Guido, P. & Mercado, S. (2011). Actitudes y comportamiento lector: una aplicación de la teoría de la conducta planeada en estudiantes de nivel medio superior. Liberabit, 17(1), 77-84.spa
dcterms.referencesMorales, S. (2011). Variables socioculturales y cognitivas en el desarrollo de la comprensión de lectura en Lima, Perú́. Revista Peruana de Investigación Educativaspa
dcterms.referencesMaldonado, F. A. C., Sandoval, R. P. & Rodríguez, A. F. (2012). Comprensión lectora en la formación inicial docente: estudiantes de educación general básica en una universidad del Consejo de Recto- res. Folios, 35, 33-47.spa
dcterms.referencesMacCallum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2009). Identifying discriminating variables that determine mobile learning adoption by educators: An initial study. Proceedings of ascilite:” Same places, different spaces”, Auckland 2009.eng
dcterms.referencesMills, L., Knezek, G., & Khaddage, F. (2014) Information seeking, information sharing, and going mobile: Three bridges to informal learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32(2) 324-334.eng
dcterms.referencesMishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6), 1017-1054.eng
dcterms.referencesMockus, L., Dawson, H., Malizia, S.E., Shaffer, D., An, J.S., & Swaggerty, A. (2011). The Impact of Mobile Access on Motivation: Distance Education Student Perspectives. Retrieved from http://learningdesign.psu.edu/research/MLRTWhitePaper.pdf.eng
dcterms.referencesMoLeNet (2007). What is the mobile learning? Retrieved from October 29, 2018, from: http://www.molenet.org.uk/.eng
dcterms.referencesMorse, J. M. (1994). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesNaismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Report 11: literature Review in mobile technologies and learning. A report for NESTA Futurelab. University of Birmingham. Retrieved February, 3(January), 2009.eng
dcterms.referencesNMC, & ELI. (2017). Informe HORIZON Edición 2017 Educación Superior, 0–22. Recuperado de: http://educalab.es/intef%0Ahttp://educalab.es/blogs/intef/spa
dcterms.referencesNMC (2016). Informe HORIZON Edición 2016 Educación Superior, 17–19. Recuperado de http://educalab.es/intef%0Ahttp://educalab.es/blogs/intef/spa
dcterms.referencesNorlyk, A., & Harder, I. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 420-431.eng
dcterms.referencesOliveira, M. L., Garzón, J. C. V., Silva, T., & Galembeck, E. (2017). El potencial de las aplicaciones educativas en el proceso de evaluación formativa. Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias: Góndola, Ens Aprend Cienc, 12(2), 99-116.spa
dcterms.referencesO’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, JP., Taylor, J., Sharples, M. & Lefrere, P. (2003). ‘Guidelines for Learning/Teaching/Tutoring in a Mobile Environment. MOBIlearn project report, D4.1. Available online at http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/guidelines.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesO'Malley, C., & Stanton, D. (2002). Tangible technologies for collaborative storytelling. 3-6. Paper presented at First European Workshop on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Birmingham, UK United Kingdom.eng
dcterms.referencesPapagiannakis, G., Singh, G., & Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2008). A survey of mobile and wireless technologies for augmented reality systems. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.221eng
dcterms.referencesPatton, M. (2002). Particularly appropriate qualitative applications. Patton MQ.Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods (3.a ed.). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delphi: Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesPatton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesPachler, N., (2009) The socio-cultural ecological approach to mobile learning: an overview, in Bachmair, B., (ed), Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen. Die deutschsprachige und britische Diskussion. Wiesbaden VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 155-169.eng
dcterms.referencesPeng, H., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning redefined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843828eng
dcterms.referencesPerry, D. (2003). Handheld computers (PDAs) in schools. Coventry, UK: BECTA.¡eng
dcterms.referencesPegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1).eng
dcterms.referencesPinkwart, N., Hoppe, H. U., Milrad, M. & Pérez, J. (2003). “Educational Scenarios for the Cooperative Use of Personal Digital Assistant”, in: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 3, 383- 391.eng
dcterms.referencesPolishook, M. (2005). Handheld Composing: Reconceptualizing artistic practice with PDAs. In A. Kukulska- Hulme & J. Traxler, (Eds.) Mobile Learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 133-138). London: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesPeng T-Y., Chang, B., Wang, H., & Hsu., Y., (2010). Development and Evaluation of a City-Wide Wireless Weather Sensor Network. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 270-280. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.3.270eng
dcterms.referencesPervin, L. A. (1984). Personality: Theory and Research. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=ESERAQAAIAAJeng
dcterms.referencesRosse, C. (1999). Anatomy atlases. Clin. Anat.,293-299.eng
dcterms.referencesRobles, H., Fontalvo, H., & Guerra Flórez, D. (2012). Desarrollo de habilidades escriturales apoyado con tecnología móvil. Teoría de La Educación: Educación y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 13(3), 380–402. Retrieved from http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/9221/9481spa
dcterms.referencesRysavy, P. (2012). No silver bullets for FCC, NTIA spectrum challenge. Daily report for executives, Bloomberg BNA, 1-4.eng
dcterms.referencesSánchez, E. P., Acle, T. G., De Agüero, S. M., Jacobo, M. A., & Rivera, M. A. (2003). Educación especial en México (1990-2001). Aprendizaje y desarrollo, 4, 189-374.spa
dcterms.referencesShearer, R. L. (2010). Philosophies and theories at the basis of student-centered educational models: Where theory and practice meet in instructional design for distance education. XV International Congress on Technology and Distance Education.eng
dcterms.referencesSilva, O. (2010). Reseña del libro “La inferencia en la comprensión lectora: de la teoría a la practica en la Educación Superior” de Mireya Cisneros Estupiñán, Giohanny Olave Arias e Ilene Rojas García. 2010. Estudios Filológicos, 45, 129-130.spa
dcterms.referencesSad, S.N. & Goktas, O. (2013). Preservice teachers’ perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4) 606-618. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2013). Mobilising teacher education: a study of a professional learning community, Teacher Development, 17:1, 118, DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2012.752671 Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32, no. 1: 5-8.eng
dcterms.referencesSeppala, P., & H. Alamaki. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (3):330-35.eng
dcterms.referencesSolé, I. (1992). Estrategias de lectura. Editorial Graó, Barcelona Pags (39-44. )spa
dcterms.referencesSolé, I., Mateos, M., Miras, M., Martín, E., Castells, N., Cuevas, I., & Gràcia, M. (2005). Reading, writing and knowledge ascquisition in secondary and higher education. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 28(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1174/0210370054740241eng
dcterms.referencesTella, S. (2003). M-learning—Cybertextual traveling or a herald of Post-Modern education. H. Kynäslahti & P. Seppälä, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Stead.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.helsinki.fi/~tella/mlearningtella.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesThomas, K. & O’Bannon, B. (2013). Cell phones in the classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(1), 11-20.eng
dcterms.referencesTecnológico de Monterrey (2015): Reporte EduTrends. Radar de Innovación Educativa 2015, Monterrey: Tecnológico de Monterrey. Recuperado de : https://observatorio.tec.mx/edu-trends-realidad-virtualy-realidad-aumentadaspa
dcterms.referencesThompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers and Education, 65, 12-33.eng
dcterms.referencesTraxler. (2009). Current State of Mobile Learning. Mobile Learning Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, 5(2), 9. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/180449/Current_State_of_Mobile_Learningeng
dcterms.referencesUlloa, A. (2008). Lectura, escritura y conocimiento en la Educación Superior. Una propuesta investigativa desde la comunicación social. II Encuentro Nacional y I Internacional sobre Lectura y Escritura en Educación Superior. Bogotá́, 18 y 19 de septiembre.spa
dcterms.referencesUgarriza Ch., N. (2006). La comprensión lectora inferencial de textos especializados y el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes universitarios del primer ciclo. Persona, (9), 31-75.spa
dcterms.referencesUNESCO (2013). El futuro del aprendizaje móvil. Implicaciones para la planificación y la formulación de políticas. París: UNESCO. Disponible en <http://www.unesco.org>.spa
dcterms.referencesVan Hover, S., Berson, M., Bolick, C., & Swan, K. (2004). Implications of ubiquitous computing for the social studies. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(3), 107-112.eng
dcterms.referencesVavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2002). A personal, mobile, Knowledge and Learning Organisation System. In Milrad, M., Hoppe, U. Kinshuk (eds.) Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Technologies in Education (WMTE2002), Aug 29-30, Vaxjo, Sweden, p. 152- 156.eng
dcterms.referencesValles, M. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid: Síntesis, 62.spa
dcterms.referencesVaradharajan, S., & Rohit P., (2009). "Allocative efficiency of the mobile industry in India and its implications for spectrum policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 521-533.eng
dcterms.referencesVílchez, M. (2003). Hábitos de lectura de los adolescentes peruanos: nuevas perspectivas. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 26(2), 57-71.spa
dcterms.referencesVera, G. & Bernal, M. (2008). Transformación de la calidad educativa: la practica pedagógica y su incidencia en la formación en investigación docente. VII Taller Nacional para la Transformación de la Formación Docente en Lenguaje. Nodo Oriente, Bucaramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santander, septiembre de 2008.spa
dcterms.referencesVigotsky, L. (1989). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Crítica.spa
dcterms.referencesWasher, P. (2007). Revisiting key skills: A practical fra- mework for higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 57-67.eng
dcterms.referencesWeinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003eng
dcterms.referencesWexler, S., Brown, J., Metcalf, D., Rogers, D. & Wagner, E. (2008). The e-learning Guild Report Mobile Learning. Retrieved from May 18, 2009, from: http://www.elearningguild.com/research/archives/index.cfm?id=132&action=viewonly.eng
dcterms.referencesWertz, R. E., Purzer, Ş., Fosmire, M. J., & Cardella, M. E. (2013). Assessing information literacy skills demonstrated in an engineering design task. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 577–602.eng
dcterms.referencesWoodill, G. (2013). The unique affordances of mobile learning understand how to leverage them prior to design and development. Retrieved on 6 March 2015 from http://floatlearning. com/ 2013/11/theunique-affordances-of-mobile-learning.eng
sb.sedeSede Barranquillaspa
sb.programaMaestría en Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computaciónspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional