Malformación del nasciturus como circunstancia de negación jurídica al derecho a la vida, frente a la posibilidad de oportunidad para aportar a un desarrollo social incluyente
Cargando...
Fecha
2019
Autores
Ortiz Quintero, Cesar Alberto
Zarate López, Liryx Sandrid
Solano Burgos, Luis Fernando
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente artículo de investigación tiene como fin, establecer un paralelo comparativo entre el aborto y el inciso segundo de la ley 355 de 2006 sobre la malformación del feto y las personas con discapacidad. Debido a que se permite firme y terminantemente, la practica sin ninguna restricción o alguna sanción penal, y por el otro aspecto mostrar desde una perspectiva empirica como las personas con discapacidad ante sus limitantes personales, sociales, culturales y normativas son capaces de salir avante y demostrarse no solo ellos sino a la sociedad y a los encargados de promulgar las leyes, que muchas veces sus decisiones arbitrarias no están pensadas en proteger el bien común; no siendo por regla general; en este caso se pretende destacar algunas personalidades que son su discapacidad a cuestan son ejemplo de superación y perseverancia a pesar de sus limitantes.
La personería jurídica es un ejemplo claro de como la norma reconoce derecho sobre toda las personas incluyendo aquellas que tengan discapacidad y les otorga derechos y desde otras perspectiva se vulnera los mismos debido a que se permite el aborto, afectando la vidad del que esta por nacer de forma tangible y todo porque padece alguna discapacidad detectada desde su vientre.
Es importante tener presente aquellas mujeres que ha pesar de tener alguna discapacidad, pueden salir adelante y al mismo tiempo el gestar un hijo como puede suceder con aquellas de baja estatura y no siendo una dificultad ni física ni psicológica para conformar una familia. Todo con el fin de identificar la discriminación que se percibe desde que esta en su vientre y además se les cohíbe el derecho de conformar una familia: inclusión social es vital para su integración a la sociedad misma
The purpose of this research article is to establish a comparative comparison between abortion and the second paragraph of Law 355 of 2006 on the malformation of the fetus and persons with disabilities. Because it is firmly and strictly allowed, the practice without any restriction or any penal sanction, and on the other hand show from an empirical perspective how people with disabilities before their personal, social, cultural and regulatory limitations are able to get ahead and demonstrate not only them but society and those in charge of promulgating the laws, that often their arbitrary decisions are not designed to protect the common good; not being as a rule; in this case it is tried to emphasize some personalities that are their disability at cost they are example of overcoming and perseverance in spite of its limitations. The legal status is a clear example of how the rule recognizes the right of all people including those with disabilities and gives them rights and from other perspectives they are violated because abortion is allowed, affecting the life of the unborn in a tangible way and all because he suffers some disability detected from his belly. It is important to keep in mind those women who despite having some disability, can move forward and at the same time gestate a child as can happen with those of short stature and not being a physical or psychological difficulty to form a family. All in order to identify the discrimination that is perceived since he is in his womb and they are also denied the right to form a family: social inclusion is vital for their integration into society itself.
The purpose of this research article is to establish a comparative comparison between abortion and the second paragraph of Law 355 of 2006 on the malformation of the fetus and persons with disabilities. Because it is firmly and strictly allowed, the practice without any restriction or any penal sanction, and on the other hand show from an empirical perspective how people with disabilities before their personal, social, cultural and regulatory limitations are able to get ahead and demonstrate not only them but society and those in charge of promulgating the laws, that often their arbitrary decisions are not designed to protect the common good; not being as a rule; in this case it is tried to emphasize some personalities that are their disability at cost they are example of overcoming and perseverance in spite of its limitations. The legal status is a clear example of how the rule recognizes the right of all people including those with disabilities and gives them rights and from other perspectives they are violated because abortion is allowed, affecting the life of the unborn in a tangible way and all because he suffers some disability detected from his belly. It is important to keep in mind those women who despite having some disability, can move forward and at the same time gestate a child as can happen with those of short stature and not being a physical or psychological difficulty to form a family. All in order to identify the discrimination that is perceived since he is in his womb and they are also denied the right to form a family: social inclusion is vital for their integration into society itself.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Discapacidad, Aborto, Mujer, Norma, Disability, Abortion, Woman, Norm
