Muerte digna: respeto hacia los derechos humanos
Cargando...
Fecha
2018
Autores
Prieto Prieto, Elba Marina
Contreras Pérez, Carmen Leonor
Pardo Ortiz, Paola Andrea
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
Morir dignamente ha sido un tema que se viene debatiendo por más de ochenta años en las áreas biológicas, éticas, religiosa, social, humana y en materia penal. Existen naciones que presenta un marco regulatorio para aceptar estas decisiones determinante como son: Sudáfrica, Australia, Alemania Federal, Austria, Bélgica, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Dinamarca, Francia, Gran Bretaña, Holanda, India, Israel, Noruega, Italia, Suecia, Japón, Nueva Zelanda, Suiza.. La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en términos generales en el cumplimiento a la muerte digna no se opone, pero solo cuando sea una decisión autónoma del paciente terminal que no desea seguir luchando por la vida y toma la decisión de practicarse la muerte digna. El Estado colombiano, es la única nación de Suramérica que acepta dicha decisión y donde la Corte Constitucional ha reiterado que es una decisión autónoma e individual del paciente terminal, con consentimiento de la familia cercana, aunque no existe de manera clara una normatividad clara para este asunto ya se ha practicado en varios casos
Dying with dignity has been an issue that has been debated for more than eighty years in the biological, ethical, religious, social, human and criminal areas. There are nations that present a regulatory framework to accept these decisive decisions such as: South Africa, Federal Germany, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, United States, France, Great Britain, Holland, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and Zimbabwe. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights in general terms does not oppose the fulfillment of dignified death, but as long as it is an autonomous decision of the terminal patient who wishes not to continue fighting for life and makes the decision to practice a dignified death. The Colombian State is the only nation in South America that accepts this decision and where the Constitutional Court has reiterated that it is an autonomous and individual decision of the terminal patient, with the consent of the close family, although there is clearly no clear norm for this issue has already been practiced in several cases
Dying with dignity has been an issue that has been debated for more than eighty years in the biological, ethical, religious, social, human and criminal areas. There are nations that present a regulatory framework to accept these decisive decisions such as: South Africa, Federal Germany, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, United States, France, Great Britain, Holland, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and Zimbabwe. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights in general terms does not oppose the fulfillment of dignified death, but as long as it is an autonomous decision of the terminal patient who wishes not to continue fighting for life and makes the decision to practice a dignified death. The Colombian State is the only nation in South America that accepts this decision and where the Constitutional Court has reiterated that it is an autonomous and individual decision of the terminal patient, with the consent of the close family, although there is clearly no clear norm for this issue has already been practiced in several cases
Descripción
Palabras clave
Muerte digna, Derechos Humanos, Decisión autónoma, Normatividad, Decent death, Human Rights, Autonomous decision, Normativity