Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseLicencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.contributor.advisorBadillo Viloria, Maria
dc.contributor.advisorPérez Díaz, Anderson
dc.contributor.authorBarandica Morales, Milagro
dc.contributor.authorMejia Mendoza, Lizeth
dc.contributor.authorMier Cañaz, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorLavalle-Galvis, Rodrigo de
dc.contributor.authorMier Cañaz, Yulith
dc.description.abstractDetermine the prevalence of infection by Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma sp. and its correlation with epidemiological and laboratory aspects, in dogs treated in veterinary clinics in Barranquilla, Colombia. Materials and methods. Retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. The data was obtained between the months from January to August 2015. 184 dogs that clinically presented the infection with these agents were studied. Criteria for positivity were immunochromatography kit and blood smear, epidemiological and laboratory data. Results. Global prevalence was ascertained as 34% (63 dogs), 28% (52/184 dogs) for E. canis and 6% (11/184 dogs) to Anaplasma sp. Hemogram of dogs infected with both bacteria were hematocrit decreased, they also showed leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions. Findings reported in this study show a high prevalence and endemicity of E. canis y Anaplasma sp. in Barranquilla when compared with other colombian regions. Hemogram findings showed to be relevant to diagnostic and prognostic of these infectious diseases.eng
dc.description.abstractDeterminar la prevalencia de la infección por Ehrlichia canis y Anaplasma sp. y su correlación con aspectos epidemiológicos y de laboratorio, en caninos atendidos en clínicas veterinarias de Barranquilla, Colombia. Materiales y Métodos. Estudio de tipo descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte transversal. Los datos se obtuvieron en los meses de enero a agosto de 2015. Se analizaron 184 caninos compatibles clínicamente con infección por Ehrlichia canis y Anaplasma sp., se utilizaron los criterios de positividad de un kit comercial de inmunocromatografía y el extendido de sangre periférica, además se recolectaron datos epidemiológicos y de laboratorio. Resultados. 63 caninos (34%) fue la prevalencia global de Ehrlichia canis y Anaplasma sp., 52/184 (28%) caninos con E. canis y 11/184 (6%) con Anaplasma sp. El hemograma de los pacientes caninos positivos con E. canis y Anaplasma sp., presentaron disminución del hematocrito, leucopenia y trombocitopenia. Conclusiones. Los hallazgos encontrados a partir de este estudio muestran una alta prevalencia y endemicidad de E. canis y Anaplasma sp. en Barranquilla en contraste con otras regiones de Colombia. Los datos del hemograma demostraron ser relevantes en el diagnóstico y pronóstico de estas
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecniaspa
dc.sourceRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.sourceVol. 22 (2017)spa
dc.subjectTick-borne diseaseseng
dc.subjectEnfermedades Transmitidas por garrapatasspa
dc.titleInfection by Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma sp. in dogs attended in veterinary clinics, Barranquilla, Atlánticoeng
dc.title.alternativeInfección por Ehrlichia canis y Anaplasma sp. en caninos atendidos en clínicas veterinarias en Barranquilla, Atlánticospa
dcterms.referencesDumler JS, Barbet AF, Bakker CP, Dasch G, Palmer GH, Ray SC, et al. Reorganization of gene in families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasm, Cowdria with Ehriichia with neorickettsia, description of six new species combinations and designatio. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51(2001):2145-65.eng
dcterms.referencesRikihisa Y. The tribe Ehrlichieae and Ehrlichial diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991; 4(3):286-308.eng
dcterms.referencesDumler JS. Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005; 1063:361-73.eng
dcterms.referencesPersichetti M-F, Solano-Gallego L, Serrano L, Altet L, Reale S, Masucci M, et al. Detection of vector-borne pathogens in cats and their ectoparasites in southern Italy. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9(1):247.eng
dcterms.referencesCarrillo LM, Betancur S, Roldán D, Pérez JE, Galeano D, Loaiza ÉT, et al. Implementación de un método basado en PCR, para el diagnóstico de Ehrlichia spp., en caninos de Medellín (Colombia). CES Med Vet y Zootec 2012; 7(2):38-46.eng
dcterms.referencesMurphy DS, Lee X, Larson SR, Hoang Johnson DK, Loo T, Paskewitz SM. Prevalence and Distribution of Human and Tick Infections with the Ehrlichia muris -Like Agent and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Wisconsin, 2009–2015. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 2017; 17(4):229-236. DOI: 10.1089/ vbz.2016.2055.eng
dcterms.referencesHarrus S, Waner T. Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): An overview. Vet J 2011; 187(3):292-6.eng
dcterms.referencesDantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Best Practices for Preventing Vector-Borne Diseases in Dogs and Humans. Trends Parasitol 2016; 32(1):43-55.eng
dcterms.referencesMccown M, Monterroso V, Cardona W. Monitoreo de Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs From Three Cities in Colombia. Rev CES 2015;10:224-31.eng
dcterms.referencesLabruna MB, Gerardi M, Krawczak FS, Moraes- Filho J. Comparative biology of the tropical and temperate species of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (Acari: Ixodidae) under different laboratory conditions. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2017; 8(1):146-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.10.011.eng
dcterms.referencesDantas-Torres F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: The butterfly effect. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2015; 4(3):452-61.eng
dcterms.referencesDantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Further thoughts on the taxonomy and vector role of Rhipicephalus sanguineus group ticks. Vet Parasitol 2015; 208(1-2):9-13.eng
dcterms.referencesOtranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB. Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part one. Trends Parasitol 2009; 25(5):228-35.eng
dcterms.referencesGaunt S, Beall M, Stillman B, Lorentzen L, Diniz P, Chandrashekar R, et al. Experimental infection and co-infection of dogs with Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis: hematologic, serologic and molecular findings. Parasit Vectors 2010; 3(1):33.eng
dcterms.referencesMcCown ME, Alleman A, Sayler KA, Chandrashekar R, Thatcher B, Tyrrell P, et al. Point prevalence survey for tick-borne pathogens in military working dogs, shelter animals, and pet populations in northern Colombia. J Spec Oper Med 2014; 14(4):81-5.eng
dcterms.referencesOrjuela CJA, García AGF, Imbachi JG. Análisis epidemiológico de la presentación de Ehrlichia sp. en caninos de Florencia Caquetá, Colombia. Rev Electron Vet 2015;16(6)
dcterms.referencesSalazar H, Buriticá EF, Echeverry DF, Barbosa IX. Seroprevalencia de Ehrlichia canis y su relación con algunos parámetros clínicos y hematológicos en caninos admitidos en clínicas veterinarias de la ciudad de Ibagué (Colombia). Rev Colomb Cienc Anim 2014; 7(1)
dcterms.referencesVargas-Hernández G, André MR, Faria JLM, Munhoz TD, Hernandez-Rodriguez M, Machado RZ, et al. Molecular and serological detection of Ehrlichia canis and Babesia vogeli in dogs in Colombia. Vet Parasitol 2012; 186(3-4):254-60.eng
dcterms.referencesSilva-molano RF, Sánchez-ucrós N, Loaiza-echeverri AM. Reporte de presentación de Ehrlichia canis en muestras sanguíneas de caninos en la ciudad de Cali, Colombia. Vet y Zootec 2008; 2(1)
dcterms.referencesRojas A, Rueda A, Díaz D, Mesa NC, Benavides J, Imbachi K, et al. Identificación de Ehrlichia canis (Donatien & Lestoquard) Moshkovski mediante PCR anidada. Vet Zootec 2013; 7(1):37-48.eng
dcterms.referencesCowell RL, Valenciano AC. Cowell and Tyler’s Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat. 4th ed. Elsevier Mosby; 2013.eng
dcterms.referencesCartagena Yarce LM, Ríos Osorio LA, Cardona Arias JA. Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis in Dogs with Suspected Infection by Tick-Borne Pathogens in Medellín, 2012-2014. Rev Med Vet 2015; (29):51-62.eng
dcterms.referencesVargas-Hernandez G, André M, Cendales DM, Sousa, Keyla Carstens Marques de Sousa K, Gonçalves LR, Hoeppner Rondelli M, et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma species in dogs in Colombia. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2016; 2961:459-64.eng
dcterms.referencesNair ADS, Cheng C, Ganta CK, Sanderson MW, Alleman AR, Munderloh UG, et al. Comparative experimental infection study in dogs with Ehrlichia canis, E. chaffeensis, Anaplasma platys and A. phagocytophilum. PLoS One 2016; 11(2):1-21.eng
dcterms.referencesDagnone A, Souza A, André M, Machado R. Molecular diagnosis of Anaplasmataceae organisms in dogs with clinical and microscopical signs of ehrlichiosis. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009; 18(4):20-5.eng
dcterms.referencesAl-Adhami B, Scandrett WB, Lobanov V a, Gajadhar A a. Serological cross-reactivity between Anaplasma marginale and an Ehrlichia species in naturally and experimentally infected cattle. J Vet diagnostic Investig 2011; 23(6):1181-8.eng
dcterms.referencesAkhtardanesh B, Ghanbarpour R, Blourizadeh H. Serological evidence of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis in Iran. Comp Clin Path 2010;19(5):469-74.eng
dcterms.referencesMovilla R, García C, Siebert S, Roura X, Harrus S, Baneth G, et al. Countrywide serological evaluation of canine prevalence for Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), Dirofilaria immitis and Ehrlichia canis in Mexico. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9(1):421.eng
dcterms.referencesYbañez AP, Ybañez RHD, Villavelez RR, Malingin HPF, Barrameda DNM, Naquila S V., et al. Retrospective analyses of dogs found serologically positive for Ehrlichia canis in Cebu, Philippines from 2003 to 2014. Vet World 2016; 9(1):43-7.eng
dcterms.referencesHarrus S. Perspectives on the pathogenesis and treatment of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis). Vet J 2015; 204(3):239-40.eng

Ficheros en el ítem


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos científicos evaluados por pares

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem