Criterios de coherencia entre los hechos jurídicamente relevantes entre la audiencia de imputación y el escrito de acusación
Cargando...
Fecha
2023
Autores
Gaitán Trujillo, Juan Carlos
Sandoval Murillo, Adriana Patricia
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
El presente ensayo, aborda la necesidad de establecer los criterios de coherencia que ha de tener el ente acusador del derecho penal, es decir la fiscalía frente a los hechos jurídicamente relevante presentados en la audiencia de imputación y posteriormente en la audiencia de acusación queda apertura a la etapa de juicio. Para lograr esto, el presente trabajo tiene por objeto determinar la naturaleza epistemológica de los ellos hechos jurídicamente relevantes, así como la identificación de cada uno de ellos -criterios de coherencia- entre una y otra audiencia. Para alcanzar estos fines, se ha trazado un diseño metodológico sustentado un paradigma hermenéutico, con un enfoque cualitativo y con un nivel de investigación descriptivo. En cuanto a los resultados de la investigación se identifican como criterios de coherencia de los hechos jurídicamente relevantes, los criterios de identidad, congruencia, de hecho, imputado y de delito; se advierte finalmente en esta investigación, los factores que alteran o rompen con la coherencia que se describe entre audiencia y audiencia, como son la acción u omisión y los factores endógenos y exógenos del sistema adversarial.
This essay addresses the need to establish the criteria of coherence that the accusing entity of criminal law must have, that is, the prosecutor's office in the face of the legally relevant facts presented in the imputation hearing and later in the indictment hearing, it remains open to the trial stage. To achieve this, the present work aims to determine the epistemological nature of the legally relevant events, as well as the identification of each one of them -coherence criteria- between one audience and another. To achieve these ends, a methodological design supported by a hermeneutic paradigm has been outlined, with a qualitative approach and a descriptive level of research. Regarding the results of the investigation, the criteria of consistency of the legally relevant facts are identified as the criteria of identity, consistency, fact, accused and crime; Finally, in this investigation, the factors that alter or break with the coherence that is described between audience and audience are noticed, such as the action or omission and the endogenous and exogenous factors of the adversarial system.
This essay addresses the need to establish the criteria of coherence that the accusing entity of criminal law must have, that is, the prosecutor's office in the face of the legally relevant facts presented in the imputation hearing and later in the indictment hearing, it remains open to the trial stage. To achieve this, the present work aims to determine the epistemological nature of the legally relevant events, as well as the identification of each one of them -coherence criteria- between one audience and another. To achieve these ends, a methodological design supported by a hermeneutic paradigm has been outlined, with a qualitative approach and a descriptive level of research. Regarding the results of the investigation, the criteria of consistency of the legally relevant facts are identified as the criteria of identity, consistency, fact, accused and crime; Finally, in this investigation, the factors that alter or break with the coherence that is described between audience and audience are noticed, such as the action or omission and the endogenous and exogenous factors of the adversarial system.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Hecho jurídicamente relevante, Inferencia razonable, Imputación, Acusación y criterios de coherencia, Legally relevant fact, Reasonable inference, Imputation, Accusation and consistency criteria