Influencia de los artículos 227 y 228 del código general del proceso en la aportación y contradicción del dictamen pericial en los procesos verbales de responsabilidad civil medica adelantados en los juzgados civiles del circuito de Barranquilla en los años 2019-2020
Cargando...
Fecha
2021
Autores
Pantoja Polo, Andrés José
Lugo Álvarez, Yerson Javier
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Resumen
La presente investigación aborda la temática relacionada con la influencia de los artículos 227 y 228 del Código General del Proceso en la aportación y contradicción del dictamen pericial en los procesos verbales de responsabilidad civil médica, teniendo en cuenta las circunstancias actuales del sistema de salud en Colombia caracterizado por una crisis generalizada y ante las múltiples quejas presentadas por los usuarios, cuya vigencia es evidente debido a que en los juzgados civiles del circuito de Barranquilla durante los años 2019 y 2020 se encuentran procesos de responsabilidad civil médica, que al ser analizados permitirán discernir si ese perito obra en calidad de testigo, arbitro, o auxiliar del juez, y cómo pueden definirse las actuaciones procesales reguladas por los artículos en mención dentro del proceso verbal. Para el estudio mencionado se asume una investigación cualitativa con un paradigma simbólico interpretativo o hermenéutico mediante un análisis documental producto de hechos jurídicos de tipo cualitativo bibliográfico con un nivel de profundidad teorico-analitico.
La investigación permite concluir que la prueba pericial se convierte en medio de prueba y acto de contradicción por decir “idóneo” en algunos de los procesos verbales de responsabilidad civil médica, dependiendo de la complejidad y tecnicidad de los hechos relevantes que se requieren apreciar y a fin de entender la providencia a partir del lenguaje técnico esgrimido, debe probarse el daño, el hecho, el nexo causal, y la culpa atribuible a título de negligencia, o impericia, sin que se admitan presunciones de hecho ni deducciones con relación a la culpa galénica porque esta debe ser suficientemente probada, evidenciándose con el análisis de las sentencias el hecho de no encontrarse contradicciones en la aplicación de la norma y principios; y se encontró claridad en el análisis de los argumentos esgrimidos por las partes.
This research addresses the issue related to the influence of articles 227 and 228 of the General Code of Procedure in the contribution and contradiction of the expert opinion in the verbal processes of medical civil liability, taking into account the current circumstances of the health system in Colombia characterized by a generalized crisis and in the face of the multiple complaints presented by users, whose validity is evident because in the civil courts of the Barranquilla circuit during 2019 and 2020 there are medical civil liability processes, which when analyzed will allow to discern if that expert works as a witness, arbitrator, or assistant to the judge, and how the procedural actions regulated by the articles in question can be defined within the verbal process. For the aforementioned study, a qualitative research with an interpretive or hermeneutical symbolic paradigm is assumed through a documentary analysis product of legal facts of a qualitative bibliographic type with a level of theoretical-analytical depth. The investigation allows to conclude that the expert evidence becomes a means of evidence and an act of contradiction by saying "suitable" in some of the verbal processes of medical civil liability, depending on the complexity and technicality of the relevant facts that are required to be assessed and in the end. To understand the ruling from the technical language used, the damage, the fact, the causal link, and the fault attributable to negligence, or inexperience must be proven, without admitting factual presumptions or deductions in relation to Galenic fault because this must be sufficiently proven, showing with the analysis of the sentences the fact that there are no contradictions in the application of the norm and principles; and clarity was found in the analysis of the arguments put forward by the parties.
This research addresses the issue related to the influence of articles 227 and 228 of the General Code of Procedure in the contribution and contradiction of the expert opinion in the verbal processes of medical civil liability, taking into account the current circumstances of the health system in Colombia characterized by a generalized crisis and in the face of the multiple complaints presented by users, whose validity is evident because in the civil courts of the Barranquilla circuit during 2019 and 2020 there are medical civil liability processes, which when analyzed will allow to discern if that expert works as a witness, arbitrator, or assistant to the judge, and how the procedural actions regulated by the articles in question can be defined within the verbal process. For the aforementioned study, a qualitative research with an interpretive or hermeneutical symbolic paradigm is assumed through a documentary analysis product of legal facts of a qualitative bibliographic type with a level of theoretical-analytical depth. The investigation allows to conclude that the expert evidence becomes a means of evidence and an act of contradiction by saying "suitable" in some of the verbal processes of medical civil liability, depending on the complexity and technicality of the relevant facts that are required to be assessed and in the end. To understand the ruling from the technical language used, the damage, the fact, the causal link, and the fault attributable to negligence, or inexperience must be proven, without admitting factual presumptions or deductions in relation to Galenic fault because this must be sufficiently proven, showing with the analysis of the sentences the fact that there are no contradictions in the application of the norm and principles; and clarity was found in the analysis of the arguments put forward by the parties.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Aportación, Contradicción, Dictamen pericial, Responsabilidad civil médica, Perito, Contribution, Contradiction, Expert opinion, Medical civil liability, Expert