Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseLicencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.contributor.authorDe Avila-Quintana, Luzdaris
dc.contributor.authorAriza-Egea, Sindy
dc.contributor.authorLlanos-González, Boris
dc.contributor.authorHerazo-Beltrán, Yaneth
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Anaya, Regina
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T14:18:26Z
dc.date.available2018-04-16T14:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn24630225
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/1973spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: To establish the relationship between social and environmental determinants and the practice of physical activity in pregnant women. Materials and methods: Cross-section study conducted in pregnant women with no contraindication to physical activity; these women came for prenatal consultation and were affiliated to two healthcare providers in Barranquilla and Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. Sampling was intentional. The social and demographic characteristics were evaluated, as well as the levels of physical activity and the perception of socio-environmental factors, including neighborhood infrastructure, esthetic considerations, the social environment, road connectivity, safety and surrounding traffic conditions. The raw Odds Ratio (OR) was estimated. Results: Out of 228 pregnant women, 208 were included in the analysis. 62% of the pregnant women fail to comply with the physical activity recommendations for maintaining their health. Some of the socio-environmental factors associated with a sedentary lifestyle in pregnancy are: living far away to walk to shops and supermarkets (OR = 5.1; 95 % CI: 2.8-9.4); poor sidewalk conditions (OR = 3.4; 95 % CI: 1.9-6.3); few people exercising around the neighborhood (OR = 4.1; 95 % CI: 2.2-7.5); not safe to walk during the day or evening (OR = 3.6; 95 % CI: 1.9-6.4). Conclusion: The perception of the socio-environmental characteristics is associated with physical activity in pregnant women. Interventions are needed to improve the socio-environmental characteristics that impact the perception of the population about these factors, in order to assess its impact on the physical activity of pregnant women.eng
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: establecer la asociación entre factores socioambientales y la práctica de actividad física en mujeres embarazadas. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal realizado en mujeres gestantes sin contraindicaciones para realizar actividad física, que asistían a la consulta prenatal, pertenecientes a dos instituciones de salud de la ciudad de Barranquilla y otra de la ciudad de Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. El muestreo fue intencional. Se evaluaron las características sociodemográficas, los niveles de actividad física y la percepción de factores socioambientales como infraestructura del barrio, las cualidades estéticas, el ambiente social, la conexión entre las calles, la seguridad y tráfico en el barrio. Se estimó la razón de odds (OR). Resultados: de un total de 228 mujeres gestantes se incluyeron 208 en el análisis. El 62% de las gestantes no cumplen las recomendaciones de actividad física para mantener su salud. Entre los factores socioambientales relacionados con la inactividad física de las embarazadas están el residir a mucha distancia de tiendas y supermercados para ir caminando (OR = 5,1; IC 95 %: 2,8-9,4); presencia de aceras en mal estado en las calles (OR = 3,4; IC 95 %: 1,9-6,3); pocas personas físicamente activas en el barrio (OR = 4,1; IC 95 %: 2,2-7,5); inseguridad en el día y en la noche para caminar (OR = 3,6; IC 95 %: 1,9-6,4). Conclusión: la percepción de las características socioambientales está asociada a la actividad física de las gestantes. Se requieren intervenciones que mejoren las características socioambientales que afectan la percepción de estos factores en la población, para evaluar su efecto en la actividad física de las gestantes.spa
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherFederación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíaspa
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíaspa
dc.sourceVol. 69, No. 1 (2018) Enero-Marzospa
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3004spa
dc.subjectMotor activityeng
dc.subjectEnvironmenteng
dc.subjectPregnancyeng
dc.subjectActividad motoraeng
dc.subjectAmbienteeng
dc.subjectEmbarazoeng
dc.titleAssociation between socioenvironmental Factors and the practice Of physical activity in pregnant women: A cross-sectional studyeng
dc.title.alternativeAsociación entre factores socioambientales y la práctica de actividad física en mujeres embarazadas: estudio de corte transversalspa
dc.typearticleeng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. 57ª Asamblea mundial de la salud. Estrategia mundial sobre régimen alimentario, actividad física y salud. Ginebra: OMS; 2004.spa
dcterms.referencesAguilar CM, Sánchez LA, Rodríguez BR, Noack SJ, Pozo CM, López CG, et al. Physical activity by pregnant women and its influence on maternal and foetal parameters; a systematic review. Nutr Hosp. 2014;30:719-26.eng
dcterms.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones mundiales sobre actividad física para la salud. Ginebra: OMS; 2010.spa
dcterms.referencesNascimento SL, Surita FG, Cecatti JG. Physical exercise during pregnancy: A systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;24:387-94. https://doi. org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328359f131eng
dcterms.referencesAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e135-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG. 0000000000001214eng
dcterms.referencesLeppe ZJ, Besomi MM, Olsen CC, Mena IM, Roa S. Nivel de actividad física según GPAQ en mujeres embarazadas y postparto que asisten a un centro de salud familiar. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2013;78:425-31. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 75262013000600004spa
dcterms.referencesHesketh KR, Evenson KR. Prevalence of U.S. Pregnant Women Meeting 2015 ACOG Physical Activity Guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51:87-9. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.023eng
dcterms.referencesZhang Y, Dong S, Zuo J, Hu X, Zhang H, Zhao Y. Physical activity level of urban pregnant women in Tianjin, China: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2014; 9:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109624eng
dcterms.referencesHallal P, Gómez L, Parra D, Lobelo F, Mosquera J, Florindo A, et al. Lecciones aprendidas después de 10 A-os del uso de IPAQ en Brasil y Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:259-S264. https://doi.org/10.1123/ jpah.7.s2.s259spa
dcterms.referencesCraig CL, Marshal AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-95. https://doi. org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FBeng
dcterms.referencesRêgo AS, Alves MT, Batista RF, Ribeiro CC, Bettiol H, Cardoso VC, et al. Physical activity in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. Cad Saúde Pública 2016;32:1- 10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00086915eng
dcterms.referencesSallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:297-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. publhealth.27.021405.102100eng
dcterms.referencesHerazo BY, Pinillos PY, Vidarte CJ, Suarez PD, Crissien QE. Perception of the environment for walking according the locality in Barranquilla, Colombia. Rev Int Med Cienc Act Fís Deporte. 2017;17:153-66.eng
dcterms.referencesLozada AL, Campero L, Hernández B, Rubalcava L, Neufeld LM. Barreras y facilitadores para actividad física durante el embarazo y posparto en mujeres pobres de México. Salud Pública Méx. 2015;57:242-51. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v57i3.7563spa
dcterms.referencesMiranda ML, Messer LC, Kroeger GL. Associations between the quality of the residential built environment and pregnancy outcomes among women in North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:471-7.eng
dcterms.referencesLaraia B, Messer LC, Evenson K. Neighborhood factors associated with physical activity and adequacy of weight gain during pregnancy. J Urban Health. 2007;84:793- 806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9217-zeng
dcterms.referencesDowns DS, Chasan-Taber L, Evenson KR, Leiferman J, Yeo S. Physical activity and pregnancy: Past and present evidence and future recommendations. Res Q Exerc Sport 2012;83:485-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/027 01367.2012.10599138eng
dcterms.referencesInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), in Short and Long Forms; 2005. p. 1-15. Available in: www.ipaq.ki.seeng
dcterms.referencesOyeyemi A, Adegoke B, Oyeyemi AY, Fatudimu B. Test-retest reliability of IPAQ environmental- module in an African population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-38eng
dcterms.referencesEvenson KR, Barakat R, Brown WJ, Dargent MP, Haruna M, Mikkelsen EM, et al. Guidelines for Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Comparisons From Around the World. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;8:102-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827613498204eng
dcterms.referencesLindqvist M, Lindkvist M, Eurenius E, Persson M, Ivarsson A, Mogren I. Leisure time physical activity among pregnant women and its associations with maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. Sex Reprod Health. 2016;9:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. srhc.2016.03.006eng
dcterms.referencesHawkins M, Kim Y, Gabriel KP, Rockette WB, Chasan TL. Sedentary behavior patterns in non-pregnant and pregnant women. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:97-03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.022eng
dcterms.referencesConnelly M, Brown H, van der Pligt P, Teychenne M. Modifiable barriers to leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy: a qualitative study investigating first time mother’s views and experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12884-015-0529-9eng
dcterms.referencesThielman J, Rosella L, Copes R, Lebenbaum M, Manson H. Neighborhood walkability: Differential associations with self-reported transport walking and leisure-time physical activity in Canadian towns and cities of all sizes. Prev Med. 2015;77:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ypmed.2015.05.011eng
dcterms.referencesMcEachan RR, Prady SL, Smith G, Fairley L, Cabieses B, Gidlow C, et al. The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: Moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:253-9. https:// doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-205954eng
dcterms.referencesVinikoor-Imler LC, Messer LC, Evenson KR, Laraia BA. Neighborhood conditions are associated with maternal health behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1302-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. socscimed.2011.08.012eng
dcterms.referencesGiurgescu C, Misra DP, Sealy-Jefferson S, Caldwell CH, Templin TN, Slaughter-Acey JC, et al. The impact of neighborhood quality, perceived stress, and social support on depressive symptoms during pregnancy in African American women. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:172- 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.006eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos [1351]
    Artículos científicos evaluados por pares

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem