Examinando por Autor "Contreras, Y"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Mathematical argumentation in the classroom(IOP Publishing, 2019) Salazar-Torres, J; Vera, M; Contreras, Y; Gelvez-Almeida, E; Valbuena, O; Barrera, D; Rincón, OThe article shares some elements of comprehensive type about "mathematical argumentation in the classroom"; whose analysis, was made from two fundamental categories in the development of an oral mathematical argumentation process for the conviction, contradiction and validation of a written mathematical argumentation process. The research addressed two central categories of argumentation as a discursive form, the first one is the epistemic position, and the second one is the discursive position that students unveil at the time of mathematically arguing the solution to a problem situation. The research was developed under the interpretative paradigm through the design of a case study directed by the theory and technique of a focal group, for the collection of information. In the findings, difficulties in the passage were evidenced from the semantic to the theoretical from the epistemic position; regarding the discursive position, the presence of three discursive forms was revealed: description, explanation and argumentation, the latter being the least used by the students.Ítem The rubric as an assessment strategy in the mathematical argumentation process(IOP Publishing, 2020) Salazar-Torres, J; Vera, M; Contreras, Y; Gelvez-Almeida, E; Huérfano, Y; Valbuena, OThe article shares the proposal of an analytical rubric as a strategy for the assessment and monitoring of learning outcomes in students who develop an argumentative plot from the mathematics field, to solve any problem situation in daily life. The study was based on the theory of mathematical argumentation proposed by Duval and the contributions of León and Calderón, as well as the dimensions presented to us by the logical frameworks in the design of analytical rubrics. The research was developed under the social critical paradigm through the design of pedagogical action research, and the focus group technique was used for the collection of information composed by five professors from the department of basic sciences. As a result, a collective rubric that, in addition to generating processes of self-assessment and self-training in teachers, evidences a decrease in the existent subjectivity of the evaluation processes, thus strengthening its objectivity.