Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseLicencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.contributor.authorOrdoñez Santos, Mary Luz
dc.contributor.authorBotello Bautista, Belcy
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Mogollón, Luz Edilma
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T21:48:12Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T21:48:12Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-15
dc.identifier.issn07981015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/1743
dc.description.abstractEl presente artículo se fundamenta en los resultados de la investigación sobre los estilos de liderazgo en los procesos de apoyo y gestión en la Universidad Simón Bolívar, sede Cúcuta. Para el efecto, líderes de los referidos procesos institucionales fueron evaluados por 57 personas, de diferentes roles administrativos y académicos, mediante la aplicación del cuestionario de liderazgo multifactorial (MLQ –5X) del modelo de rango total de Bass y Avolio. Del análisis de los resultados, se colige que el estilo de los líderes responsables de la gestión y apoyo organizacional, no presenta diferencias significativas, aun siendo estos de naturaleza diferente. Sin embargo, es destacable la prevalencia de la motivación inspiracional y la gerencia por excepción activa, en el ejercicio de los liderazgos transformacional y transaccional, respectivamente. En la misma dirección, el análisis de los resultados muestra que, dentro de la aplicación de los mismos estilos, los evaluadores encontraron menos valiosos los factores de consideración individualizada, en el liderazgo transformacional y de recompensa contingente, en el transaccional. No obstante que, los modelos de liderazgo transformacional y transaccional son mundialmente reconocidos, la institución dada su naturaleza, podría hacer aproximaciones teóricoprácticas a otros modelos de liderazgo para retroalimentar y fortalecer los procesos y roles de sus directivos en el afán de alcanzar los más óptimos niveles de desempeño.spa
dc.description.abstractThe article is based on the research of leadership styles with regard to the support and management process at Simón Bolívar University, Cúcuta. The leaders of these processes were evaluated by 57 people with different academic and administrative roles. The multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ 5X), based on Bass and Avolio full range leadership model, was carried out and results indicate that the leadership style of those responsible for the management and organizational process does not present significant differences; however, there is a prevalence of inspirational motivation and active management by exception in transformational and transactional leaderships, respectively. Results also show that individualized consideration in transformational leadership and contingent reward in transactional leadership were less important. Although transformational leadership and transactional models are internationally recognized the Simón Bolivar University, given its nature, could use other theoretical and practical approaches for alternative leadership models in order to give feedback and strengthen the processes and management roles in an effort to achieve higher performance levels.eng
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherAsociacion de Profesionales y Tecnicos del CONICIT.spa
dc.sourceRevista Espaciosspa
dc.sourceVol. 38, No.61 (2017)spa
dc.source.urihttp://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n61/17386111.html
dc.subjectLiderazgospa
dc.subjectLiderazgo transaccionalspa
dc.subjectLiderazgo transformacionalspa
dc.subjectLeadershipeng
dc.subjectTransactional leadershipeng
dc.subjectTransformational leadershipeng
dc.titleEstilos de liderazgo desde la perspectiva de rango totalspa
dc.title.alternativeLeadership styles from a full range perspectiveeng
dc.typearticlespa
dcterms.referencesAbrell-Vogel, C., & Rowold, J. (2014). Leaders’ commitment to change and their effectiveness in change–a multilevel investigation. Journal of organizational change management, 27(6), 900- 921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2012-0111eng
dcterms.referencesAntonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2002). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: JAI-Elsevier Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005006eng
dcterms.referencesAvolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1991). Leading in the 1990s: The four I's of transformational leadership. Journal of European industrial training, 15(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090599110143366eng
dcterms.referencesAvolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789eng
dcterms.referencesBass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990).Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.eng
dcterms.referencesBass B. & Avolio, B. (1994). Improving Organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications. Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership, New York: Harper and Roweng
dcterms.referencesBass, B. M. (1996). Is there universality in the full range model of leadership? International Journal of Public Administration, 19(6), 731-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900699608525119eng
dcterms.referencesBass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American psychologist, 52(2), 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130eng
dcterms.referencesBass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000).MLQ: Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden.eng
dcterms.referencesBass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207-218. 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207eng
dcterms.referencesBerson, Y., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. (2003). Level specification: Using triangulation in a grounded theory approach to construct validation. Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and strategy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2, 85-112.eng
dcterms.referencesBlake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964).The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesChaimongkonrojna, T., & Steane, P. (2015). Effectiveness of full range leadership development among middle managers. Journal of Management Development, 34(9), 1161-1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2014-0002eng
dcterms.referencesCarlyle, T. (1993). On heroes, hero-worship, and the heroic in history (Vol. 1). Univ of California Presseng
dcterms.referencesDartey-Baah, K. (2015). Resilient leadership: a transformational-transactional leadership mix. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(1), 99-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JGR-07-2014- 0026eng
dcterms.referencesDumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B., & Avolio, B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005008eng
dcterms.referencesEdwards, G., Schyns, B., Gill, R., & Higgs, M. (2012). The MLQ factor structure in a UK context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33 (4), 369-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731211229304eng
dcterms.referencesFiedler, F. (2015). Contingency theory of leadership. Organizational Behavior 1: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership, 232.eng
dcterms.referencesGraen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6 (2), 219-247.eng
dcterms.referencesGregory Stone, A., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671eng
dcterms.referencesHeifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (1997).The work of leadership. Harvard business review, 75, 124- 134.eng
dcterms.referencesHouse, R. J. (1992). Charismatic leadership in service-producing organizations.International Journal of Service Industry Management, 3(2), 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564239210011944eng
dcterms.referencesJudge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A metaanalysis test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755eng
dcterms.referencesJung, D.I., Yammarino, F.J., & Lee, J.K. (2009). Moderating role of subordinates' attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multilevel perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 586–603. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.011eng
dcterms.referencesKhalifa, B., & Ayoubi, R. M. (2015). Leadership styles at Syrian higher education: What matters for organizational learning at public and private universities? .International Journal of Educational Management, 29(4), 477-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0036eng
dcterms.referencesTaylor, T. Z., Psotka, J., & Legree, P. (2015). Relationships among applications of tacit knowledge and transformational/transactional leader styles: An exploratory comparison of the MLQ and TKML. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(2), 120-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2013-0008eng
dcterms.referencesVroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). Managing participation: A critical dimension of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 7(5), 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb051689eng
dcterms.referencesWhittington, J. L., McKee, V., Goodwin, V. L., & Bell, R. G. (2013). Chapter 12 Applying Fuzzy Set Methodology to Evaluate Substitutes for Leadership. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 38) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 38, 279-302. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/S0733- 558X(2013)0000038016eng
dcterms.referencesXirasagar, S. (2008). Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership among physician executives. Journal of Health organization and management, 22(6), 599-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777260810916579eng
dcterms.referencesYahaya, R., & Ebrahim, F. A. (2016). Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review. Journal of Management Development, 35(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD01- 2015-0004eng
dcterms.referencesZopiatis, A., & Constanti, P. (2012). Extraversion, openness and conscientiousness: The route to transformational leadership in the hotel industry. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33, 86–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731211193133eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos [1351]
    Artículos científicos evaluados por pares

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem